SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Despite Record, US Retains Seat on UN Human Rights Council
Human rights groups call election 'more rhetoric than reality'
Nov 12, 2012
Despite previous and ongoing criticism of the United States' "dismal" record on human rights, the United Nations General Assembly on Monday re-elected the US to the UN Human Rights Council.
The US, Germany and Ireland received more votes than competitors Greece and Sweden for only three contested seats representing a Western block.
The Associated Press reports that the five countries were all deemed qualified by the rights groups--less than three weeks after the UN announced it would likely initiate an investigation into civilian deaths caused by the CIA and US military's use of drones and other targeted killing programs.
Still, human rights groups saved their criticism of the "scandalous" election for 15 members elected in uncontested races to represent the rest of the world. Among the new members are Ethiopia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone and Venezuela.
Philippe Bolopion, a United Nations specialist for Human Rights Watch, said the regional groups that selected their representatives prior to today's vote "pre-cooked this election by offering as many candidates as they have been allotted seats, making a mockery of the standard driven process envisioned by the General Assembly when it created the Human Rights Council. He objected to "questionable candidates" such as Ethiopia, Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates or Venezuela, among others, joining the council "without even having to make the case that they 'uphold the highest standards' of human rights."
"States elected to the Human Rights Council should take real steps to address rights concerns at home before taking up their seats in Geneva next January," said Yap Swee Seng, executive director of Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA). "Pakistan, for one, should show up at the council having demonstrated tangible improvements in the prevention of discrimination and attacks against religious minorities, the protection of human rights defenders and journalists, and ending enforced disappearances."
"To call the vote in the General Assembly an 'election' gives this process way too much credit," said Peggy Hicks, global advocacy director at Human Rights Watch. "Until there is real competition for seats in the Human Rights Council, its membership standards will remain more rhetoric than reality."
The entire UN General Assembly voted Monday to fill 183 seats on the 47-member council, formed in 2006 to replace the politicized Human Rights Commission. But the Human Rights Council has also been attacked for favoring Israel.
When the council was created, former President George W. Bush boycotted it over criticism of Israel and the council's refusal to cite flagrant abuses such as in Sudan.
In 2009, President Barack Obama sought to join the council, but this year launched its bid late and was lobbied hard to retain the seat.
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States made a 30-point list of pledges in a statement to council members that emphasized US action to get a special investigator named on rights in Iran, as well as domestic US legislation on the rights of gays and lesbians.
The United States committed "to be a strong advocate for all people around the world who suffer from abuse and oppression and a stalwart defender of courageous individuals across the globe who work, often at great personal risk, on behalf of the rights of others," said the statement.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
barack obamadronesethiopiageorge w. bushgreecehuman rights watchiranirelandisraelpakistansudanvenezuela
Despite previous and ongoing criticism of the United States' "dismal" record on human rights, the United Nations General Assembly on Monday re-elected the US to the UN Human Rights Council.
The US, Germany and Ireland received more votes than competitors Greece and Sweden for only three contested seats representing a Western block.
The Associated Press reports that the five countries were all deemed qualified by the rights groups--less than three weeks after the UN announced it would likely initiate an investigation into civilian deaths caused by the CIA and US military's use of drones and other targeted killing programs.
Still, human rights groups saved their criticism of the "scandalous" election for 15 members elected in uncontested races to represent the rest of the world. Among the new members are Ethiopia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone and Venezuela.
Philippe Bolopion, a United Nations specialist for Human Rights Watch, said the regional groups that selected their representatives prior to today's vote "pre-cooked this election by offering as many candidates as they have been allotted seats, making a mockery of the standard driven process envisioned by the General Assembly when it created the Human Rights Council. He objected to "questionable candidates" such as Ethiopia, Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates or Venezuela, among others, joining the council "without even having to make the case that they 'uphold the highest standards' of human rights."
"States elected to the Human Rights Council should take real steps to address rights concerns at home before taking up their seats in Geneva next January," said Yap Swee Seng, executive director of Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA). "Pakistan, for one, should show up at the council having demonstrated tangible improvements in the prevention of discrimination and attacks against religious minorities, the protection of human rights defenders and journalists, and ending enforced disappearances."
"To call the vote in the General Assembly an 'election' gives this process way too much credit," said Peggy Hicks, global advocacy director at Human Rights Watch. "Until there is real competition for seats in the Human Rights Council, its membership standards will remain more rhetoric than reality."
The entire UN General Assembly voted Monday to fill 183 seats on the 47-member council, formed in 2006 to replace the politicized Human Rights Commission. But the Human Rights Council has also been attacked for favoring Israel.
When the council was created, former President George W. Bush boycotted it over criticism of Israel and the council's refusal to cite flagrant abuses such as in Sudan.
In 2009, President Barack Obama sought to join the council, but this year launched its bid late and was lobbied hard to retain the seat.
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States made a 30-point list of pledges in a statement to council members that emphasized US action to get a special investigator named on rights in Iran, as well as domestic US legislation on the rights of gays and lesbians.
The United States committed "to be a strong advocate for all people around the world who suffer from abuse and oppression and a stalwart defender of courageous individuals across the globe who work, often at great personal risk, on behalf of the rights of others," said the statement.
Despite previous and ongoing criticism of the United States' "dismal" record on human rights, the United Nations General Assembly on Monday re-elected the US to the UN Human Rights Council.
The US, Germany and Ireland received more votes than competitors Greece and Sweden for only three contested seats representing a Western block.
The Associated Press reports that the five countries were all deemed qualified by the rights groups--less than three weeks after the UN announced it would likely initiate an investigation into civilian deaths caused by the CIA and US military's use of drones and other targeted killing programs.
Still, human rights groups saved their criticism of the "scandalous" election for 15 members elected in uncontested races to represent the rest of the world. Among the new members are Ethiopia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone and Venezuela.
Philippe Bolopion, a United Nations specialist for Human Rights Watch, said the regional groups that selected their representatives prior to today's vote "pre-cooked this election by offering as many candidates as they have been allotted seats, making a mockery of the standard driven process envisioned by the General Assembly when it created the Human Rights Council. He objected to "questionable candidates" such as Ethiopia, Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates or Venezuela, among others, joining the council "without even having to make the case that they 'uphold the highest standards' of human rights."
"States elected to the Human Rights Council should take real steps to address rights concerns at home before taking up their seats in Geneva next January," said Yap Swee Seng, executive director of Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA). "Pakistan, for one, should show up at the council having demonstrated tangible improvements in the prevention of discrimination and attacks against religious minorities, the protection of human rights defenders and journalists, and ending enforced disappearances."
"To call the vote in the General Assembly an 'election' gives this process way too much credit," said Peggy Hicks, global advocacy director at Human Rights Watch. "Until there is real competition for seats in the Human Rights Council, its membership standards will remain more rhetoric than reality."
The entire UN General Assembly voted Monday to fill 183 seats on the 47-member council, formed in 2006 to replace the politicized Human Rights Commission. But the Human Rights Council has also been attacked for favoring Israel.
When the council was created, former President George W. Bush boycotted it over criticism of Israel and the council's refusal to cite flagrant abuses such as in Sudan.
In 2009, President Barack Obama sought to join the council, but this year launched its bid late and was lobbied hard to retain the seat.
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States made a 30-point list of pledges in a statement to council members that emphasized US action to get a special investigator named on rights in Iran, as well as domestic US legislation on the rights of gays and lesbians.
The United States committed "to be a strong advocate for all people around the world who suffer from abuse and oppression and a stalwart defender of courageous individuals across the globe who work, often at great personal risk, on behalf of the rights of others," said the statement.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.