

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Campaign finance reform and the 2010 landmark Citizens United decision were the subjects of a speech Monday by former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold at the University of Montana in Missoula.
Feingold said the Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to spend unregulated amounts of money on elections was "one of the great turning points, not only in campaign finance, but also in our country's history ... I believe we're in a constitutional crisis," the University of Montana News reported.
Feingold served for 18 years as a Democratic senator from Wisconsin and was the lone senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001. He voted against the Iraq War, and in 2005 was the first senator to call for the U.S. to withdraw from that country.
In 2006 Feingold voted to censure President George W. Bush for authorizing an illegal program to spy on American citizens on American soil and then misleading Congress and the public about the program's existence.
Earlier on Monday, he presented a seminar titled "Campaign Finance in the Post-Citizens United Era."
"Montana is really one of the most, if not the most important state in the country when it comes to challenging the bad decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United," Feingold said Monday, according to the University of Montana News. "Montana is saying wait a minute, we don't want corporations to control our democracy. So i'm very proud to be here to talk about that."
In June, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 defeated a Montana law that would have continued limits on political contributions in the state. The decision signaled that the court likely would not reconsider the Citizens United case, and prompted Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, to tell MSNBC that the state would now "have to accept dirty, secret, corporate and even foreign money."
On Sept. 24, a report issued by the Sunlight Foundation stated that 78 percent of 2012 outside election spending could be attributed to the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allows unregulated amounts of corporate and otherwise outside campaign donations.
The corporations, Feingold told Salon.com in September, are "being egged on by consultants, media firms and media outlets that basically get all this money. I think we sometimes forget that it's not just those who want to influence elections or have their candidates win, but there's a huge pot of gold here with regard to those who actually get the money."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Campaign finance reform and the 2010 landmark Citizens United decision were the subjects of a speech Monday by former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold at the University of Montana in Missoula.
Feingold said the Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to spend unregulated amounts of money on elections was "one of the great turning points, not only in campaign finance, but also in our country's history ... I believe we're in a constitutional crisis," the University of Montana News reported.
Feingold served for 18 years as a Democratic senator from Wisconsin and was the lone senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001. He voted against the Iraq War, and in 2005 was the first senator to call for the U.S. to withdraw from that country.
In 2006 Feingold voted to censure President George W. Bush for authorizing an illegal program to spy on American citizens on American soil and then misleading Congress and the public about the program's existence.
Earlier on Monday, he presented a seminar titled "Campaign Finance in the Post-Citizens United Era."
"Montana is really one of the most, if not the most important state in the country when it comes to challenging the bad decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United," Feingold said Monday, according to the University of Montana News. "Montana is saying wait a minute, we don't want corporations to control our democracy. So i'm very proud to be here to talk about that."
In June, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 defeated a Montana law that would have continued limits on political contributions in the state. The decision signaled that the court likely would not reconsider the Citizens United case, and prompted Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, to tell MSNBC that the state would now "have to accept dirty, secret, corporate and even foreign money."
On Sept. 24, a report issued by the Sunlight Foundation stated that 78 percent of 2012 outside election spending could be attributed to the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allows unregulated amounts of corporate and otherwise outside campaign donations.
The corporations, Feingold told Salon.com in September, are "being egged on by consultants, media firms and media outlets that basically get all this money. I think we sometimes forget that it's not just those who want to influence elections or have their candidates win, but there's a huge pot of gold here with regard to those who actually get the money."
Campaign finance reform and the 2010 landmark Citizens United decision were the subjects of a speech Monday by former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold at the University of Montana in Missoula.
Feingold said the Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to spend unregulated amounts of money on elections was "one of the great turning points, not only in campaign finance, but also in our country's history ... I believe we're in a constitutional crisis," the University of Montana News reported.
Feingold served for 18 years as a Democratic senator from Wisconsin and was the lone senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001. He voted against the Iraq War, and in 2005 was the first senator to call for the U.S. to withdraw from that country.
In 2006 Feingold voted to censure President George W. Bush for authorizing an illegal program to spy on American citizens on American soil and then misleading Congress and the public about the program's existence.
Earlier on Monday, he presented a seminar titled "Campaign Finance in the Post-Citizens United Era."
"Montana is really one of the most, if not the most important state in the country when it comes to challenging the bad decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United," Feingold said Monday, according to the University of Montana News. "Montana is saying wait a minute, we don't want corporations to control our democracy. So i'm very proud to be here to talk about that."
In June, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 defeated a Montana law that would have continued limits on political contributions in the state. The decision signaled that the court likely would not reconsider the Citizens United case, and prompted Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, to tell MSNBC that the state would now "have to accept dirty, secret, corporate and even foreign money."
On Sept. 24, a report issued by the Sunlight Foundation stated that 78 percent of 2012 outside election spending could be attributed to the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allows unregulated amounts of corporate and otherwise outside campaign donations.
The corporations, Feingold told Salon.com in September, are "being egged on by consultants, media firms and media outlets that basically get all this money. I think we sometimes forget that it's not just those who want to influence elections or have their candidates win, but there's a huge pot of gold here with regard to those who actually get the money."