Protests in Iran Over Plummeting Currency
Sign that western-imposed sanctions are "compounding the country's economic woes"
Clashes broke out in Tehran's Grand Bazaar and other Iranian cities' markets on Wednesday as the value of Iran's currency, the rial, continues to plummet, having lost more than a third of its value in a week.
Riot police used tear gas on protesters and tried to block streets, according to witnesses who spoke to the Guardian. Reuters adds that some "protesters denounced President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a 'traitor' whose policies had fueled the crisis."
Western-imposed sanctions on Iran over its alleged nuclear program have hurt the country's earnings from oil exports.
Writing at the Guardian, Saeed Kamali Dehghan points out the recent upheaval's connection to the sanctions on Iran:
The devaluation of the rial and soaring prices of staple goods are the latest signs that western sanctions - targeting the regime's nuclear program - and government mismanagement are compounding the country's economic woes.
But sanctions will not only compound economic problems, they can lead to war, says Juan Cole.
The University of Michigan history professor and Middle East analyst writes on Thursday "Iran Bazaar Strikes signal Misery, not Sanctions 'Victory'" and underscores the history of failures sanctions have brought:
Severe sanctions almost never work in producing regime change or even in altering major policies of regimes. In Iraq, the severe sanctions of the 1990s actually destroyed the middle classes and eviscerated civil and political society, leaving Iraqis more at the mercy of the authoritarian Baath Party of Saddam Hussein than ever before. The high Baath officials squirreled away $30 billion during the oil for food program, cushioning themselves But the sanctions that denied Iraqis chlorine imports disabled the water purification plants, giving the whole country constant diarrhea, a condition that easily kills infants and toddlers. Some 500,000 Iraqi children are estimated to have been killed this way.
Usama Bin Laden cited this death toll of Iranian children as one of the reasons for his 9/11 attacks on the US. If the sanctions end up killing Iranian children, the US could be borrowing a lot more trouble for the future.
Moreover, the difficulty of maintaining the sanctions on Iraq was given as a reason by then deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz as a reason for going to war with Iraq. Severe sanctions often do not deflect wars but rather lead to them.
The collapse of the rial, then, may be a signal that the Iranian public is in for great suffering and that the savings of the middle class are about to be wiped out. But that would mean they would lack the money to pay for an insurrection. Moreover, while they are blaming Ahmadinejad now, they know that the US, the EU and Israel are behind their deepening misery, and they are likely to come to hate their torturers.
* * *
* * *
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Clashes broke out in Tehran's Grand Bazaar and other Iranian cities' markets on Wednesday as the value of Iran's currency, the rial, continues to plummet, having lost more than a third of its value in a week.
Riot police used tear gas on protesters and tried to block streets, according to witnesses who spoke to the Guardian. Reuters adds that some "protesters denounced President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a 'traitor' whose policies had fueled the crisis."
Western-imposed sanctions on Iran over its alleged nuclear program have hurt the country's earnings from oil exports.
Writing at the Guardian, Saeed Kamali Dehghan points out the recent upheaval's connection to the sanctions on Iran:
The devaluation of the rial and soaring prices of staple goods are the latest signs that western sanctions - targeting the regime's nuclear program - and government mismanagement are compounding the country's economic woes.
But sanctions will not only compound economic problems, they can lead to war, says Juan Cole.
The University of Michigan history professor and Middle East analyst writes on Thursday "Iran Bazaar Strikes signal Misery, not Sanctions 'Victory'" and underscores the history of failures sanctions have brought:
Severe sanctions almost never work in producing regime change or even in altering major policies of regimes. In Iraq, the severe sanctions of the 1990s actually destroyed the middle classes and eviscerated civil and political society, leaving Iraqis more at the mercy of the authoritarian Baath Party of Saddam Hussein than ever before. The high Baath officials squirreled away $30 billion during the oil for food program, cushioning themselves But the sanctions that denied Iraqis chlorine imports disabled the water purification plants, giving the whole country constant diarrhea, a condition that easily kills infants and toddlers. Some 500,000 Iraqi children are estimated to have been killed this way.
Usama Bin Laden cited this death toll of Iranian children as one of the reasons for his 9/11 attacks on the US. If the sanctions end up killing Iranian children, the US could be borrowing a lot more trouble for the future.
Moreover, the difficulty of maintaining the sanctions on Iraq was given as a reason by then deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz as a reason for going to war with Iraq. Severe sanctions often do not deflect wars but rather lead to them.
The collapse of the rial, then, may be a signal that the Iranian public is in for great suffering and that the savings of the middle class are about to be wiped out. But that would mean they would lack the money to pay for an insurrection. Moreover, while they are blaming Ahmadinejad now, they know that the US, the EU and Israel are behind their deepening misery, and they are likely to come to hate their torturers.
* * *
* * *
Clashes broke out in Tehran's Grand Bazaar and other Iranian cities' markets on Wednesday as the value of Iran's currency, the rial, continues to plummet, having lost more than a third of its value in a week.
Riot police used tear gas on protesters and tried to block streets, according to witnesses who spoke to the Guardian. Reuters adds that some "protesters denounced President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a 'traitor' whose policies had fueled the crisis."
Western-imposed sanctions on Iran over its alleged nuclear program have hurt the country's earnings from oil exports.
Writing at the Guardian, Saeed Kamali Dehghan points out the recent upheaval's connection to the sanctions on Iran:
The devaluation of the rial and soaring prices of staple goods are the latest signs that western sanctions - targeting the regime's nuclear program - and government mismanagement are compounding the country's economic woes.
But sanctions will not only compound economic problems, they can lead to war, says Juan Cole.
The University of Michigan history professor and Middle East analyst writes on Thursday "Iran Bazaar Strikes signal Misery, not Sanctions 'Victory'" and underscores the history of failures sanctions have brought:
Severe sanctions almost never work in producing regime change or even in altering major policies of regimes. In Iraq, the severe sanctions of the 1990s actually destroyed the middle classes and eviscerated civil and political society, leaving Iraqis more at the mercy of the authoritarian Baath Party of Saddam Hussein than ever before. The high Baath officials squirreled away $30 billion during the oil for food program, cushioning themselves But the sanctions that denied Iraqis chlorine imports disabled the water purification plants, giving the whole country constant diarrhea, a condition that easily kills infants and toddlers. Some 500,000 Iraqi children are estimated to have been killed this way.
Usama Bin Laden cited this death toll of Iranian children as one of the reasons for his 9/11 attacks on the US. If the sanctions end up killing Iranian children, the US could be borrowing a lot more trouble for the future.
Moreover, the difficulty of maintaining the sanctions on Iraq was given as a reason by then deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz as a reason for going to war with Iraq. Severe sanctions often do not deflect wars but rather lead to them.
The collapse of the rial, then, may be a signal that the Iranian public is in for great suffering and that the savings of the middle class are about to be wiped out. But that would mean they would lack the money to pay for an insurrection. Moreover, while they are blaming Ahmadinejad now, they know that the US, the EU and Israel are behind their deepening misery, and they are likely to come to hate their torturers.
* * *
* * *