Aug 22, 2007
BAGHDAD - New U.S. military operations across Iraq appear to be worsening the situation.
On Aug. 13 about 16,000 U.S. and Iraqi troops began a massive new military operation north of Baghdad. According to the U.S. military, the goal of the operation, named Lightning Hammer, is to "target insurgents who have fled a crackdown in the restive city of Baquba."
The operation is part of a larger military offensive, Operation Phantom Strike, whose goal is "to disrupt al-Qaeda in Iraq and Shia extremist operations in Iraq."
Both operations have included extensive use of air strikes. Many residents speak with bitterness about the operations and the language used to describe tem.
"This is not the first time that we have heard nice words about military operations that they say aim for our security and prosperity," 50-year-old teacher Kassim Hussein told IPS in Baghdad. "Yet every time it was more killing, sieges and poverty. It is a war that we did not have to fight, but we are the biggest losers every time it is ignited by the Americans."
According to a press release on the official website of the Multi-National Forces in Iraq dated Aug. 13, Operation Phantom Strike "consists of simultaneous operations throughout Iraq focused on pursuing remaining AQI (al-Qaeda in Iraq) terrorists and Iranian-supported extremist elements."
The MNF press release claimed that the operation had "liberated large segments of the Iraqi population from AQI" and that the operations were "appreciably improving the lives of the Iraqi people."
But many Iraqis recall U.S. military offensives in Fallujah (60 km west of Baghdad), al-Qa'im (400 km northwest of Baghdad), Haditha (240 km northwest of Baghdad) and other cities practically destroyed under the flag of fighting terror.
"I have no house now because of another phantom operation in my city," Hamid Salman, a retired government worker from Fallujah told IPS in Baghdad. "I have to live with my brother in his small house here in Baghdad, and tens of thousands of Fallujah people are suffering the same situation. That was all the American ghosts and furies did for us."
According to an Aug. 19 air power summary from the U.S. Air Force, a B-1 bomber destroyed three buildings in Baghdad, and F-16 fighter jets dropped guided munitions and fired cannon rounds in Baghdad and Iskandariyah (40 km south of Baghdad). A total of 68 air support missions were flown in Iraq that day alone.
"Death walks with the military," former Iraqi army Brigadier General Mustafa Hashim told IPS in Baghdad. "There is never a clean military operation, and so more civilians are expected to be killed, injured or evicted from their homes."
According to the group Just Foreign Policy, an independent organisation "dedicated to reforming U.S. foreign policy to serve the interests and reflect the values of the broad majority of Americans," more than one million Iraqis have died as a direct result of the U.S.-led invasion and occupation.
The group's number is based primarily on data extrapolated from a scientific study published in the Lancet medical journal in Britain Oct. 11, 2006.
"The method the U.S. army follows when attacking a city is to intensify fire regardless of the possibility of civilians' existence in the targeted place," said Hashim. "In fact, they would shoot even when they are certain of civilians' existence. Their culture is to achieve victory no matter what."
While the U.S. military has issued many reports about the recent operations, Iraqis continue to doubt the claims of success.
"It is all about the media, politics, elections, and conflict inside the U.S. Congress and such business," Waleed al-Ubaydi, a political analyst at Baghdad University told IPS. "They know in advance that their offensives are not going to achieve much, but they have to show their people and the world that they are active on the ground.
"Al-Qaeda and other fighters have put their cells to sleep for the time being, concentrating on taking the U.S. army by surprise here and there. This is an endless story unless a miracle takes place in a time when miracles do not take place any more."
Many Iraqis say the U.S. occupation leaders should consider what matters to civilians, since most Iraqis are now living under the worst conditions possible. They say it is the responsibility of the occupation forces to provide people with decent living conditions, rather than fight Bush's war on Iraqi ground and at Iraqi peoples' expense.
"Bush has nothing to lose here except his reputation which he has already lost," Hamdan Salih, an unemployed lawyer in Baghdad told IPS. "He is pushing Iraqis to fight each other and meanwhile attacking our cities in search of his own enemies, who most of the time happen to be our sons and brothers. He is sacrificing Iraqi pawns for the American oil king."
(*Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who travels extensively in the region)
Copyright (c) 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
BAGHDAD - New U.S. military operations across Iraq appear to be worsening the situation.
On Aug. 13 about 16,000 U.S. and Iraqi troops began a massive new military operation north of Baghdad. According to the U.S. military, the goal of the operation, named Lightning Hammer, is to "target insurgents who have fled a crackdown in the restive city of Baquba."
The operation is part of a larger military offensive, Operation Phantom Strike, whose goal is "to disrupt al-Qaeda in Iraq and Shia extremist operations in Iraq."
Both operations have included extensive use of air strikes. Many residents speak with bitterness about the operations and the language used to describe tem.
"This is not the first time that we have heard nice words about military operations that they say aim for our security and prosperity," 50-year-old teacher Kassim Hussein told IPS in Baghdad. "Yet every time it was more killing, sieges and poverty. It is a war that we did not have to fight, but we are the biggest losers every time it is ignited by the Americans."
According to a press release on the official website of the Multi-National Forces in Iraq dated Aug. 13, Operation Phantom Strike "consists of simultaneous operations throughout Iraq focused on pursuing remaining AQI (al-Qaeda in Iraq) terrorists and Iranian-supported extremist elements."
The MNF press release claimed that the operation had "liberated large segments of the Iraqi population from AQI" and that the operations were "appreciably improving the lives of the Iraqi people."
But many Iraqis recall U.S. military offensives in Fallujah (60 km west of Baghdad), al-Qa'im (400 km northwest of Baghdad), Haditha (240 km northwest of Baghdad) and other cities practically destroyed under the flag of fighting terror.
"I have no house now because of another phantom operation in my city," Hamid Salman, a retired government worker from Fallujah told IPS in Baghdad. "I have to live with my brother in his small house here in Baghdad, and tens of thousands of Fallujah people are suffering the same situation. That was all the American ghosts and furies did for us."
According to an Aug. 19 air power summary from the U.S. Air Force, a B-1 bomber destroyed three buildings in Baghdad, and F-16 fighter jets dropped guided munitions and fired cannon rounds in Baghdad and Iskandariyah (40 km south of Baghdad). A total of 68 air support missions were flown in Iraq that day alone.
"Death walks with the military," former Iraqi army Brigadier General Mustafa Hashim told IPS in Baghdad. "There is never a clean military operation, and so more civilians are expected to be killed, injured or evicted from their homes."
According to the group Just Foreign Policy, an independent organisation "dedicated to reforming U.S. foreign policy to serve the interests and reflect the values of the broad majority of Americans," more than one million Iraqis have died as a direct result of the U.S.-led invasion and occupation.
The group's number is based primarily on data extrapolated from a scientific study published in the Lancet medical journal in Britain Oct. 11, 2006.
"The method the U.S. army follows when attacking a city is to intensify fire regardless of the possibility of civilians' existence in the targeted place," said Hashim. "In fact, they would shoot even when they are certain of civilians' existence. Their culture is to achieve victory no matter what."
While the U.S. military has issued many reports about the recent operations, Iraqis continue to doubt the claims of success.
"It is all about the media, politics, elections, and conflict inside the U.S. Congress and such business," Waleed al-Ubaydi, a political analyst at Baghdad University told IPS. "They know in advance that their offensives are not going to achieve much, but they have to show their people and the world that they are active on the ground.
"Al-Qaeda and other fighters have put their cells to sleep for the time being, concentrating on taking the U.S. army by surprise here and there. This is an endless story unless a miracle takes place in a time when miracles do not take place any more."
Many Iraqis say the U.S. occupation leaders should consider what matters to civilians, since most Iraqis are now living under the worst conditions possible. They say it is the responsibility of the occupation forces to provide people with decent living conditions, rather than fight Bush's war on Iraqi ground and at Iraqi peoples' expense.
"Bush has nothing to lose here except his reputation which he has already lost," Hamdan Salih, an unemployed lawyer in Baghdad told IPS. "He is pushing Iraqis to fight each other and meanwhile attacking our cities in search of his own enemies, who most of the time happen to be our sons and brothers. He is sacrificing Iraqi pawns for the American oil king."
(*Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who travels extensively in the region)
Copyright (c) 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
BAGHDAD - New U.S. military operations across Iraq appear to be worsening the situation.
On Aug. 13 about 16,000 U.S. and Iraqi troops began a massive new military operation north of Baghdad. According to the U.S. military, the goal of the operation, named Lightning Hammer, is to "target insurgents who have fled a crackdown in the restive city of Baquba."
The operation is part of a larger military offensive, Operation Phantom Strike, whose goal is "to disrupt al-Qaeda in Iraq and Shia extremist operations in Iraq."
Both operations have included extensive use of air strikes. Many residents speak with bitterness about the operations and the language used to describe tem.
"This is not the first time that we have heard nice words about military operations that they say aim for our security and prosperity," 50-year-old teacher Kassim Hussein told IPS in Baghdad. "Yet every time it was more killing, sieges and poverty. It is a war that we did not have to fight, but we are the biggest losers every time it is ignited by the Americans."
According to a press release on the official website of the Multi-National Forces in Iraq dated Aug. 13, Operation Phantom Strike "consists of simultaneous operations throughout Iraq focused on pursuing remaining AQI (al-Qaeda in Iraq) terrorists and Iranian-supported extremist elements."
The MNF press release claimed that the operation had "liberated large segments of the Iraqi population from AQI" and that the operations were "appreciably improving the lives of the Iraqi people."
But many Iraqis recall U.S. military offensives in Fallujah (60 km west of Baghdad), al-Qa'im (400 km northwest of Baghdad), Haditha (240 km northwest of Baghdad) and other cities practically destroyed under the flag of fighting terror.
"I have no house now because of another phantom operation in my city," Hamid Salman, a retired government worker from Fallujah told IPS in Baghdad. "I have to live with my brother in his small house here in Baghdad, and tens of thousands of Fallujah people are suffering the same situation. That was all the American ghosts and furies did for us."
According to an Aug. 19 air power summary from the U.S. Air Force, a B-1 bomber destroyed three buildings in Baghdad, and F-16 fighter jets dropped guided munitions and fired cannon rounds in Baghdad and Iskandariyah (40 km south of Baghdad). A total of 68 air support missions were flown in Iraq that day alone.
"Death walks with the military," former Iraqi army Brigadier General Mustafa Hashim told IPS in Baghdad. "There is never a clean military operation, and so more civilians are expected to be killed, injured or evicted from their homes."
According to the group Just Foreign Policy, an independent organisation "dedicated to reforming U.S. foreign policy to serve the interests and reflect the values of the broad majority of Americans," more than one million Iraqis have died as a direct result of the U.S.-led invasion and occupation.
The group's number is based primarily on data extrapolated from a scientific study published in the Lancet medical journal in Britain Oct. 11, 2006.
"The method the U.S. army follows when attacking a city is to intensify fire regardless of the possibility of civilians' existence in the targeted place," said Hashim. "In fact, they would shoot even when they are certain of civilians' existence. Their culture is to achieve victory no matter what."
While the U.S. military has issued many reports about the recent operations, Iraqis continue to doubt the claims of success.
"It is all about the media, politics, elections, and conflict inside the U.S. Congress and such business," Waleed al-Ubaydi, a political analyst at Baghdad University told IPS. "They know in advance that their offensives are not going to achieve much, but they have to show their people and the world that they are active on the ground.
"Al-Qaeda and other fighters have put their cells to sleep for the time being, concentrating on taking the U.S. army by surprise here and there. This is an endless story unless a miracle takes place in a time when miracles do not take place any more."
Many Iraqis say the U.S. occupation leaders should consider what matters to civilians, since most Iraqis are now living under the worst conditions possible. They say it is the responsibility of the occupation forces to provide people with decent living conditions, rather than fight Bush's war on Iraqi ground and at Iraqi peoples' expense.
"Bush has nothing to lose here except his reputation which he has already lost," Hamdan Salih, an unemployed lawyer in Baghdad told IPS. "He is pushing Iraqis to fight each other and meanwhile attacking our cities in search of his own enemies, who most of the time happen to be our sons and brothers. He is sacrificing Iraqi pawns for the American oil king."
(*Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who travels extensively in the region)
Copyright (c) 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.