SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump Didn't 'Revoke' Protections for Trans Students-Because He Can't
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
Feb 23, 2017
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.