

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Not so long ago, Yale University received a $150 million gift. That looked like a lot until Harvard scooped up $400 million a few weeks later. Both gifts came from Wall Street speculators - Blackstone Group Founder and CEO Stephen Schwarzman and hedge fund executive John S Paulson. Paulson's donation alone was more money than 98 percent of US colleges have in their endowments, critics pointed out. It shows just how far-reaching inequality has become they said. It also reveals a thing or two about what's become of our democracy.
Not so long ago, Yale University received a $150 million gift. That looked like a lot until Harvard scooped up $400 million a few weeks later. Both gifts came from Wall Street speculators - Blackstone Group Founder and CEO Stephen Schwarzman and hedge fund executive John S Paulson. Paulson's donation alone was more money than 98 percent of US colleges have in their endowments, critics pointed out. It shows just how far-reaching inequality has become they said. It also reveals a thing or two about what's become of our democracy.
As economist Richard Wolff's pointed out, with their charitable contributions Paulson and Schwarzman gave - in the first case to endow an engineering school and in the second to build an arts center (Yale's third.) But the multi billionaires also took - from us - the general public, because under the law the two can use their gifts to their alma maters to pay less to Uncle Sam.
Wolff calculates Schwarzman will save upwards of $75 million -and Paulson way more. As a result, public coffers will be that much poorer.
Yale's already the second richest college in the country. Harvard's the first. The two elite colleges claim they serve everyone with their scholarship funds. But let's be serious. If as a society we wanted to diminish inequality and unequal access to quality education and opportunity - would we really chose to spend hundreds of millions more on private palaces while public schools cry out for libraries?
Probably not, but then again, that's what makes US capitalism special. We prioritize individual, not government decision making. Unlike those meddlesome socialist societies, we let the self, not the state decide our fate.
If such is the way things are, let's at least tweak the terminology. After a century of anti-stuff, let's call capitalism what it is: anti-socialism. It's flat out anti-social and proud of it.
See more from this week's GRITtv episode in the video below:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Not so long ago, Yale University received a $150 million gift. That looked like a lot until Harvard scooped up $400 million a few weeks later. Both gifts came from Wall Street speculators - Blackstone Group Founder and CEO Stephen Schwarzman and hedge fund executive John S Paulson. Paulson's donation alone was more money than 98 percent of US colleges have in their endowments, critics pointed out. It shows just how far-reaching inequality has become they said. It also reveals a thing or two about what's become of our democracy.
As economist Richard Wolff's pointed out, with their charitable contributions Paulson and Schwarzman gave - in the first case to endow an engineering school and in the second to build an arts center (Yale's third.) But the multi billionaires also took - from us - the general public, because under the law the two can use their gifts to their alma maters to pay less to Uncle Sam.
Wolff calculates Schwarzman will save upwards of $75 million -and Paulson way more. As a result, public coffers will be that much poorer.
Yale's already the second richest college in the country. Harvard's the first. The two elite colleges claim they serve everyone with their scholarship funds. But let's be serious. If as a society we wanted to diminish inequality and unequal access to quality education and opportunity - would we really chose to spend hundreds of millions more on private palaces while public schools cry out for libraries?
Probably not, but then again, that's what makes US capitalism special. We prioritize individual, not government decision making. Unlike those meddlesome socialist societies, we let the self, not the state decide our fate.
If such is the way things are, let's at least tweak the terminology. After a century of anti-stuff, let's call capitalism what it is: anti-socialism. It's flat out anti-social and proud of it.
See more from this week's GRITtv episode in the video below:
Not so long ago, Yale University received a $150 million gift. That looked like a lot until Harvard scooped up $400 million a few weeks later. Both gifts came from Wall Street speculators - Blackstone Group Founder and CEO Stephen Schwarzman and hedge fund executive John S Paulson. Paulson's donation alone was more money than 98 percent of US colleges have in their endowments, critics pointed out. It shows just how far-reaching inequality has become they said. It also reveals a thing or two about what's become of our democracy.
As economist Richard Wolff's pointed out, with their charitable contributions Paulson and Schwarzman gave - in the first case to endow an engineering school and in the second to build an arts center (Yale's third.) But the multi billionaires also took - from us - the general public, because under the law the two can use their gifts to their alma maters to pay less to Uncle Sam.
Wolff calculates Schwarzman will save upwards of $75 million -and Paulson way more. As a result, public coffers will be that much poorer.
Yale's already the second richest college in the country. Harvard's the first. The two elite colleges claim they serve everyone with their scholarship funds. But let's be serious. If as a society we wanted to diminish inequality and unequal access to quality education and opportunity - would we really chose to spend hundreds of millions more on private palaces while public schools cry out for libraries?
Probably not, but then again, that's what makes US capitalism special. We prioritize individual, not government decision making. Unlike those meddlesome socialist societies, we let the self, not the state decide our fate.
If such is the way things are, let's at least tweak the terminology. After a century of anti-stuff, let's call capitalism what it is: anti-socialism. It's flat out anti-social and proud of it.
See more from this week's GRITtv episode in the video below: