ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Hospital for Denying Reproductive Health Care

For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Leslie Fulbright, 415-621-2493, LFulbright@aclunc.org

Allison Steinberg, 212-549-2540, asteinberg@aclu.org

ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Hospital for Denying Reproductive Health Care

Dignity Health Hospital Network Continues to Refuse Pregnancy-Related Care Because of Religious Directives

WASHINGTON - The ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP have filed a lawsuit challenging Dignity Health’s use of religious directives to deny basic reproductive health care to its patients. Filed on behalf of patient Rebecca Chamorro and Physicians for Reproductive Health, the suit argues that withholding pregnancy-related care for reasons other than medical considerations is illegal in California.

Chamorro lives in Redding and is a patient at Dignity Health’s Mercy Medical Center, the only hospital in Redding with a labor and delivery ward. She decided with her doctor that she would get a tubal ligation during her scheduled C-section in late January. But the hospital refused her doctor’s request to perform the procedure, citing religious directives written by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that classify sterilization procedures as “intrinsically evil.” For Chamorro, there are no hospitals within a 70-mile radius that have birthing facilities and do not follow these directives.

“The refusal of hospitals to allow doctors to perform basic health procedures based solely on religious doctrine presents a real threat to a woman’s ability to access health care,” said Elizabeth Gill, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California. “Patients seeking medical care from public institutions should not have to worry that religious doctrine rather than medical judgment will dictate what care they receive.”

In addition to the lawsuit, ACLU attorneys are filing an emergency motion asking the court to prevent Dignity Health from using the religious directives to interfere with Chamorro’s care so that her doctor can perform the procedure during her scheduled delivery in January. A hearing on this motion is scheduled for Jan. 5 at 11 am in San Francisco Superior Court.

Tubal ligation, known familiarly as “getting one’s tubes tied,” is the contraceptive method of choice for more than 30 percent of U.S. married women of reproductive age. An estimated 600,000 women undergo this procedure each year. For women who want a tubal ligation, performing it immediately following delivery (or postpartum) is best practice and aligns with medical standards of care.

“This is an incredibly common and safe method of contraception, especially for women who are scheduled for a C-section,” said Dr. Pratima Gupta, a board-certified OB/GYN and member of Physicians for Reproductive Health. “Many women prefer postpartum tubal ligation to other birth control alternatives because it is a highly effective method that will only prolong surgery time a few minutes.”

In August, the ACLU sent a demand letter on behalf of Rachel Miller, another Redding woman who decided with her doctor to have a tubal ligation following the C-section birth of her second child. Under the threat of a lawsuit, the hospital allowed Miller to have the procedure.

A similar demand letter was sent Dec. 2 on behalf of Chamorro, but thus far Dignity Health has refused to authorize her doctor to perform the tubal ligation.

Dignity Health is the 5th largest healthcare system in the country and the largest hospital provider in California, with 29 hospitals across the state. Ten of the 25 largest hospital systems in the U.S. are Catholic-sponsored, and nearly one of nine hospital beds in the country is in a Catholic facility.

The complaint can be found at: https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/12-28-chamorro-complaintfs

###

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) conserves America's original civic values working in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in the United States by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Share This Article