December, 14 2009, 10:13am EDT
Nonprofit David Cuts Down Agribusiness Goliaths
Dean Foods, Target Stumble—Being Forced to Correct Deceptive Practices
CORNUCOPIA, Wis.
An
investigation by the USDA's National Organic Program has determined that Target
Corporation wrongly used the image of a certified organic product when
promoting the sale of a conventional product to consumers. The
investigation was triggered by a complaint filed by The Cornucopia Institute, a
farm policy group and organic watchdog based in Wisconsin.
The violation at Target came after Dean Foods switched almost all their
category-leading Silk soymilk from organic to conventional soybeans earlier
this year. The specific problem involved Target using an image of a Silk
organic product, in advertising flyers, when the retailer was really selling
Silk's reformulated "natural" version (not organic,
but made with conventional soybeans). Target made a commitment to the
USDA to review their procedures to "prevent future errors of this
nature."
And now, over eight months after Dean Foods stealthily switched its
core Silk product line to cheaper conventional soybeans, while, until recently,
retaining the same packaging appearance. Now the giant dairy
processor's WhiteWave division has been found itself to also be
misrepresenting the product as organic on one of their own websites. A new
legal complaint has been filed in an attempt to protect consumers from what
Cornucopia calls, "fraudulent misrepresentation."
"It should not take the judicious oversight of an industry
watchdog to cause these giant corporations to simply comply with the
law," said Mark Kastel,
Cornucopia's Senior Farm Policy Analyst. "Target and Dean are
trying to do organics on the cheap and have not invested in the kind of
management expertise necessary to prevent problems of this nature from
occurring," added Kastel. "And after widespread media
condemnation, it's hard to believe that Dean Foods hasn't even cleaned up its
own websites."
Since the NOP investigation, and Target's pledge to review their
practices, unlike Dean Foods, Cornucopia has not observed additional problems
with the retailer's advertising.
The meteoric rise in consumer interest in healthy, environmentally
sound and humane farming practices has catapulted organics into a $24 billion
industry. Along the way, major agribusinesses , like General Mills, Dean
Foods and Kraft have gobbled up many pioneering companies that helped build the
industry through a series of acquisitions. Today, most processed organic
food is produced and controlled by the same type of companies that bring us
International Delight imitation coffee creamer, Cheetos, Ding Dongs and Cap'n
Crunch.
No longer controlled by industry visionaries, corporate managers now
seek to squeeze extra profits out by sometimes switching established organic
brands to "natural" labeling, using cheaper conventionally grown and
processed ingredients.
That's a far cry from when the organic food and farming movement first
started enjoying widespread commercial success in the 1980s. In its
inception, the industry was dominated by a number of family businesses,
entrepreneurial enterprises and farmer-owned cooperatives, where building a
profitable brand was most often married with the owner's values.
"Big is not necessarily bad in the organic industry," said Mark Kastel, codirector of The Cornucopia
Institute. "As an organic watchdog we are much more concerned with
'corporate ethics' than we are with 'corporate
scale.'"
Dean Foods, the largest dairy processor in the United States, has apparently
acquiesced and finally changed
the packaging for their Silk brand of soymilk. Cornucopia had sparked
widespread media scrutiny, and associated consumer backlash, against Dean for
quietly shifting their core silk product line from organic to conventional
soybeans-while keeping essentially the same packaging and UPC (scanner)
barcodes. "This change [new packaging] should have happened right as
they shifted to conventional soybeans, not after the fact," said Kastel.
"For the better part of this past
year, consumers and retailers both have repeatedly reported that they were
deceived and ended up unknowingly buying Silk products with conventional
soybeans," stated Kastel. With both their new and old packaging
still in the marketplace, Cornucopia is concerned that consumers will be misled
by advertising on websites representing the product as organic.
Silk is manufactured and distributed by Dean Foods' WhiteWave-MorningStar
division headquartered in Longmont,
Colorado. Like many other
massive agribusiness corporations, the Dean name never appears on the packaging
for its soy foods or its Horizon
dairy label-just as consumers will never see the name General Mills on a
package of Cascadian Farms frozen
vegetables, Kraft on Back to Nature
brand crackers or Kellogg's on Kashi
cereal.
Dean/WhiteWave spokesperson Sara Loveday denied the corporation
intentionally misled their customers, telling the East Bay Express in a November interview, "The company
was not trying take advantage of consumer confusion over organic and
'natural.'"
"These corporate food giants know that many organic consumers are
looking for an alternative to our current food production system," said Will Fantle, who heads up Cornucopia's research
staff. "Upon acquiring a number of the leading organic pioneers,
they have kept their subsidiary names upfront on packaging to create a facade
"hiding" the true corporate ownership," Fantle noted.
Cornucopia maintains a chart, Who
Owns Organics, created by Michigan
State University
professor Philip Howard, on its website that lifts the veil, enabling consumers
to know who is producing their favorite organic brands (https://www.cornucopia.org/who-owns-organic/).
Roy Beard, who has operated Roy's
Natural Market in Dallas
for 41 years, told the Fort Worth
Star-Telegram, in their November 8 coverage surrounding the Silk
controversy, that he hadn't realized there was a product change until
contacted by a reporter. He said retaining the same bar code "was
troubling." Most retailers were never informed of the Silk
switch to conventional soybeans.
Dean/WhiteWave has also received heat in the organic food and
agriculture community for choosing to convert some of their Horizon dairy products, the leading
organic label in terms of sales volume, to cheaper "natural"
(conventional) ingredients.
"This really hit a nerve because one of these new Horizon products,
Little Blends yogurt, is aimed
specifically at toddlers, at an early stage of development, where the
nutritional superiority of organic food, and its benefit of avoiding chemical
residues in our food, is so critically important," Kastel explained.
"This starkly undermines the propaganda on the Horizon website proclaiming
how dedicated they are to the organic movement-this is all about profit,
not values!"
The media blow up on the Silk switcheroo included a front-page story in
the Chicago Tribune in July that
outlined a consumer survey indicating the public was unclear about the
difference between natural and organic labels and that some corporations,
particularly Dean Foods, were taking advantage of the confusion in the
marketplace.
"Dean has only added to the marketplace confusion between
'natural' and 'organic,' as they definitely do not mean the same
thing, and 'natural' requires no verification whatsoever," Urvashi
Rangan, a senior scientist at Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer
Reports, also told Barry Shlachter of the Star-Telegram.
The Cornucopia's Kastel likes to identify corporate giant Heinz
as a company doing organics right. "They helped fund California tomato
growers who switched to organic production, and they brought in a highly reputable
organic certifier, produced the product in their own plant, and finally put the
Heinz name on the label," Kastel stated. "I think their ethical
approach to organic production is what consumers expect and is being rewarded
in the marketplace by virtue of the success they're having with their organic
ketchup."
Cornucopia also cites Stonyfield yogurt, which was acquired by group
Danone of France, as another example of a large public corporation continuing
to uphold organic values. Stonyfield remains committed to buying all of
their milk from family-scale organic farmers, unlike Dean Foods that is
increasingly relying on factory farms for its Horizon milk supply.
"The independently owned organizations, although they are fewer,
have not totally gone away," observed Fantle. Eden Foods,
Nature's Path and Organic Valley, among others, are still independently
owned even though they each do as much as $500 million of business every
year."
The new legal complaint filed against Dean Foods, for representing their
conventional Silk soymilk as organic on one of their websites, was filed with
the USDA's National Organic Program. "We fully expect the NOP to
send a cease and desist order to Dean Foods," said Kastel. If Dean,
a $12 billion a year public corporation, is found to have willfully violated
the federal law governing organic commerce, it could be subject to fines and
other penalties.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Dodges Growing Calls for Probe of Mass Graves at Gaza Hospitals
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," said one legal expert.
Apr 24, 2024
While continuing to give Israel billions of dollars in support to wage war on the Gaza Strip, the Biden administration this week has declined to join the growing global demands for an international probe into mass graves discovered at hospitals in the besieged Palestinian enclave.
Two journalists on Tuesday questioned Vedant Patel, a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, about the administration's response to the hundreds of bodies found at Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital and Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis as well as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk's call for an independent investigation.
"Would you support such an independent investigation?" Said Arikat asked during a press briefing. Patel responded, "Right now, Said, we are asking for more information... That is squarely where we are leaving the conversation."
Patel added that "I don't have any details to match, confirm, or offer as it relates to that. We're aware of those reports, and we have asked the government of Israel for additional clarity and information. And that's where I'm at."
When Said asked a follow-up about potential U.S. support for a probe, Patel reiterated that the administration is awaiting information from the Israeli government.
Later, Niall Stanage asked Patel to explain U.S. "resistance" to supporting a probe, the spokesperson insisted that "it's not about resistance to this particular situation, it is me not wanting to speak in detail about something which Said posed as a hypothetical question when, from the United States' perspective, I don't have any additional information on this aside from the public reporting."
After Patel again stressed that the administration has asked Israel for more information, Stanage inquired, "And do you believe the government of Israel is a credible source in enlightening you?"
The spokesperson interrupted Stanage to say, "We do."
While supporting the six-month Israeli assault on Gaza that the International Court of Justice has found to be plausibly genocidal, the Biden administration is also arming Ukrainians' resistance to a Russian invasion. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser for the Crisis Group's U.S. program and a former legal adviser at the State Department, pointed to the latter.
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," Finucane said on social media in response to Stanage's questioning.
Meanwhile, European Union spokesperson Peter Stano made clear Tuesday that the E.U. supports an independent probe.
"This is something that forces us to call for an independent investigation of all the suspicions and all the circumstances, because indeed it creates the impression that there might have been violations of international human rights committed," Stano said. "That's why it's important to have independent investigation and to ensure accountability."
Human rights groups around the world joined the call for an independent investigation on Wednesday, as the official death toll in Gaza hit 34,262 with 77,229 people injured and thousands more missing and presumed dead beneath the rubble.
In an Arabic statement translated by Al Jazeera, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said that the number of bodies found in the mass graves is "alarming, and requires urgent international action, including the formation of an independent international investigation committee."
The group added that some of those killed were subjected to "premeditated murder as well as arbitrary and extrajudicial executions while they were detained and handcuffed."
Amnesty International senior director of research, advocacy, policy, and campaigns Erika Guevara Rosas said in a statement that "the harrowing discovery of these mass graves underscores the urgency of ensuring immediate access for human rights investigators, including forensic experts, to the occupied Gaza Strip to ensure that evidence is preserved and to carry out independent and transparent investigations with the aim of guaranteeing accountability for any violations of international law."
"Lack of access for human rights investigators to Gaza has hampered effective investigations into the full scale of the human rights violations and crimes under international law committed over the past six months, allowing for the documentation of just a tiny fraction of these abuses," she noted. "Without proper investigations to determine how these deaths took place or what violations may have been committed, we may never find out the truth of the horrors behind these mass graves."
Guevara Rosas continued:
Mass grave sites are potential crime scenes offering vital and time-sensitive forensic evidence; they must be protected until professional forensic experts with the necessary skills and resources can safely carry out adequate exhumations and accurate identification of remains.
The absence of forensic experts and the decimation of Gaza's medical sector as a result of the war and Israel's cruel blockade, along with the lack of availability of the necessary resources for the identification of bodies such as DNA testing, are huge obstacles to the identifications of remains. This denies those killed the opportunity to have a dignified burial and deprives families with relatives missing or forcibly disappeared the right to know and to justice—leaving them in a limbo of uncertainty and anguish.
Noting that the International Court of Justice directed Israel to preserve evidence in its initial genocide case order, Guevara Rosas said that "amid a total vacuum of accountability and mounting evidence of war crimes in Gaza, Israeli authorities must ensure they comply with the ICJ ruling by granting immediate access to independent human rights investigators and ensuring that all evidence of violations is preserved."
"Third states must pressure Israel to comply with the ICJ orders by allowing the immediate entry into the Gaza Strip of independent human rights investigators and forensic experts, including the U.N.-appointed Commission of Inquiry and investigators of the International Criminal Court," she added. "There can be no truth and justice without proper, transparent independent investigations into these deaths."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular