November, 17 2009, 10:23am EDT
ICC: Promote Global Support for Court
Use Annual Gathering of 110 Members to Confront Critics, Strengthen International Justice
THE HAGUE
International Criminal Court member countries should use their
annual meeting to strengthen international support for the court's
mission and independence, Human Rights Watch said today. The ICC
Assembly of States Parties, which oversees court administration, will
meet in The Hague for nine days beginning November 18, 2009.
The ICC made important progress this year, including the start of
its first trial, Human Rights Watch said. But the court faces
significant challenges, including outstanding arrest warrants in three
of the four countries in which it has investigations and efforts to
undermine the court by allies of President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, who
is being sought for crimes against humanity in Darfur.
"The ICC has made mistakes that need to be tackled," said Elizabeth
Evenson, counsel in the International Justice Program at Human Rights
Watch. "But the ICC's 110 member countries should step up their efforts
to uphold its critical role as a court of last resort and to respond
vigorously to the court's unprincipled opponents."
Many ICC members, including African members, are working to reaffirm
their commitment to international justice. For example, at least two
African ICC members - South Africa and Botswana - rejected an African
Union decision in July to withhold cooperation to arrest President
al-Bashir. Human Rights Watch called on ICC members to use the annual
meeting to speak out forcefully on the ICC's crucial function and to
encourage the court to strengthen its own public information activities.
ICC members will also gather next May in Kampala, Uganda for a
review conference mandated by the Rome Statute, which created the court
and entered into force in 2002. At the meeting, member countries will
take stock of the state of international criminal justice and consider
amendments to the Rome Statute. Extending the reach of international
justice and assessing its impact on communities affected by crimes
within the ICC's jurisdiction are among the topics states should
address at that conference, Human Rights Watch said.
"Taking stock of the achievements and shortcomings of international
justice at the review conference will help to identify and meet
challenges in the years ahead," Evenson said. "ICC member countries
should ensure that careful preparation for the review conference is
made now to deliver results in Kampala."
Increased international cooperation is essential to the success of
the court, Human Rights Watch said. ICC member countries should bolster
these efforts by creating a permanent working group to address such
issues as concluding witness relocation and sentence enforcement
agreements.
In reviewing the court's annual budget at the meeting, member
countries should ensure that the court has the resources it needs in
The Hague and through its presence in countries where it is conducting
investigations, as well as in key capitals including New York and Addis
Ababa. The ICC prosecutor recently announced he would seek
authorization to open a fifth ICC investigation, in Kenya.
"Increasing ICC activities and fulfilling higher expectations of
justice mean that governments will need to continue to invest in the
court," said Evenson.
In a memorandum sent
to governments last week, Human Rights Watch called attention to a
number of other issues likely to be under discussion during the
meeting. These include the need to set a policy for court-paid family
visits for indigent ICC detainees, make certain that two judges to be
elected during the meeting are the most highly qualified candidates,
and prepare to elect the next ICC prosecutor. Human Rights Watch also
reiterated the need for court officials to continue to make progress in
building an effective, fair, and credible institution.
Background
The International Criminal Court is the world's first permanent
court mandated to bring to justice perpetrators of war crimes, crimes
against humanity, and genocide when national courts are unable or
unwilling to do so.
The ICC prosecutor has opened investigations in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, northern Uganda, the Darfur region of Sudan, and the
Central African Republic. Based on those investigations, 13 arrest
warrants and one summons to appear have been issued. The ICC prosecutor
also is looking at a number of other situations in countries around the
world. These include Kenya, Colombia, Georgia, Cote d'Ivoire,
Afghanistan, and Guinea. The Palestinian National Authority has also
petitioned the ICC prosecutor to accept jurisdiction over crimes
committed in Gaza.
To date, four individuals are in ICC custody in The Hague. A fifth
individual, Bahr Idriss Abu Garda - who is charged with war crimes in
connection with an attack on African Union peacekeepers in Darfur - has
appeared voluntarily during pre-trial proceedings. The court began its
first trial, of the Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, on
January 26, and completed pre-trial proceedings in two additional
cases. The court's second trial, against the Congolese rebel leaders
Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, is expected to start on
November 24.
In addition to President al-Bashir and two other individuals in the
Darfur situation, arrest warrants remain outstanding for leaders of the
Lord's Resistance Army in northern Uganda and for Bosco Ntaganda, a
former rebel commander now integrated into the Congolese national army.
The Assembly of States Parties was created by the Rome Statute to
provide management oversight of the administration of the court. It
consists of representatives of each state member and is required to
meet at least once a year but can meet more often as required.
The ICC's jurisdiction may be triggered in one of three ways. States
parties or the UN Security Council can refer a situation (meaning a
specific set of events) to the ICC prosecutor, or the ICC prosecutor
can seek on his own motion the authorization of a pre-trial chamber of
ICC judges to open an investigation.
The Rome Statute mandates that seven years after the treaty enters
into force, the UN secretary-general is to convene a review conference
to consider any amendments to the treaty. At its seventh Assembly of
States Parties, in 2008, ICC members agreed to hold the conference in
Kampala. It is scheduled to begin on May 31, 2010.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 88 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Correction: This article originally said Trump faces 91 federal and state felony charges. The correct number is 88.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular