

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

International Criminal Court member countries should use their
annual meeting to strengthen international support for the court's
mission and independence, Human Rights Watch said today. The ICC
Assembly of States Parties, which oversees court administration, will
meet in The Hague for nine days beginning November 18, 2009.
The ICC made important progress this year, including the start of
its first trial, Human Rights Watch said. But the court faces
significant challenges, including outstanding arrest warrants in three
of the four countries in which it has investigations and efforts to
undermine the court by allies of President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, who
is being sought for crimes against humanity in Darfur.
"The ICC has made mistakes that need to be tackled," said Elizabeth
Evenson, counsel in the International Justice Program at Human Rights
Watch. "But the ICC's 110 member countries should step up their efforts
to uphold its critical role as a court of last resort and to respond
vigorously to the court's unprincipled opponents."
Many ICC members, including African members, are working to reaffirm
their commitment to international justice. For example, at least two
African ICC members - South Africa and Botswana - rejected an African
Union decision in July to withhold cooperation to arrest President
al-Bashir. Human Rights Watch called on ICC members to use the annual
meeting to speak out forcefully on the ICC's crucial function and to
encourage the court to strengthen its own public information activities.
ICC members will also gather next May in Kampala, Uganda for a
review conference mandated by the Rome Statute, which created the court
and entered into force in 2002. At the meeting, member countries will
take stock of the state of international criminal justice and consider
amendments to the Rome Statute. Extending the reach of international
justice and assessing its impact on communities affected by crimes
within the ICC's jurisdiction are among the topics states should
address at that conference, Human Rights Watch said.
"Taking stock of the achievements and shortcomings of international
justice at the review conference will help to identify and meet
challenges in the years ahead," Evenson said. "ICC member countries
should ensure that careful preparation for the review conference is
made now to deliver results in Kampala."
Increased international cooperation is essential to the success of
the court, Human Rights Watch said. ICC member countries should bolster
these efforts by creating a permanent working group to address such
issues as concluding witness relocation and sentence enforcement
agreements.
In reviewing the court's annual budget at the meeting, member
countries should ensure that the court has the resources it needs in
The Hague and through its presence in countries where it is conducting
investigations, as well as in key capitals including New York and Addis
Ababa. The ICC prosecutor recently announced he would seek
authorization to open a fifth ICC investigation, in Kenya.
"Increasing ICC activities and fulfilling higher expectations of
justice mean that governments will need to continue to invest in the
court," said Evenson.
In a memorandum sent
to governments last week, Human Rights Watch called attention to a
number of other issues likely to be under discussion during the
meeting. These include the need to set a policy for court-paid family
visits for indigent ICC detainees, make certain that two judges to be
elected during the meeting are the most highly qualified candidates,
and prepare to elect the next ICC prosecutor. Human Rights Watch also
reiterated the need for court officials to continue to make progress in
building an effective, fair, and credible institution.
Background
The International Criminal Court is the world's first permanent
court mandated to bring to justice perpetrators of war crimes, crimes
against humanity, and genocide when national courts are unable or
unwilling to do so.
The ICC prosecutor has opened investigations in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, northern Uganda, the Darfur region of Sudan, and the
Central African Republic. Based on those investigations, 13 arrest
warrants and one summons to appear have been issued. The ICC prosecutor
also is looking at a number of other situations in countries around the
world. These include Kenya, Colombia, Georgia, Cote d'Ivoire,
Afghanistan, and Guinea. The Palestinian National Authority has also
petitioned the ICC prosecutor to accept jurisdiction over crimes
committed in Gaza.
To date, four individuals are in ICC custody in The Hague. A fifth
individual, Bahr Idriss Abu Garda - who is charged with war crimes in
connection with an attack on African Union peacekeepers in Darfur - has
appeared voluntarily during pre-trial proceedings. The court began its
first trial, of the Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, on
January 26, and completed pre-trial proceedings in two additional
cases. The court's second trial, against the Congolese rebel leaders
Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, is expected to start on
November 24.
In addition to President al-Bashir and two other individuals in the
Darfur situation, arrest warrants remain outstanding for leaders of the
Lord's Resistance Army in northern Uganda and for Bosco Ntaganda, a
former rebel commander now integrated into the Congolese national army.
The Assembly of States Parties was created by the Rome Statute to
provide management oversight of the administration of the court. It
consists of representatives of each state member and is required to
meet at least once a year but can meet more often as required.
The ICC's jurisdiction may be triggered in one of three ways. States
parties or the UN Security Council can refer a situation (meaning a
specific set of events) to the ICC prosecutor, or the ICC prosecutor
can seek on his own motion the authorization of a pre-trial chamber of
ICC judges to open an investigation.
The Rome Statute mandates that seven years after the treaty enters
into force, the UN secretary-general is to convene a review conference
to consider any amendments to the treaty. At its seventh Assembly of
States Parties, in 2008, ICC members agreed to hold the conference in
Kampala. It is scheduled to begin on May 31, 2010.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
Iran's first vice president called the attack a new "symbol of Trump's madness and ignorance."
A wave of US-Israeli airstrikes on Monday hit and extensively damaged Sharif University of Technology, a leading Iranian educational institution that is widely known as "the MIT of Iran" and seen as one of the world's top engineering schools.
The attack on the Tehran university—one of dozens of education sites bombed by the US and Israel since they launched their war on Iran in late February—sparked outrage inside Iran and around the world. Mohammad Reza Aref, an engineer currently serving as Iran's first vice president, said the attack on Sharif University "is a symbol of [US President Donald] Trump's madness and ignorance."
"He fails to understand that Iran's knowledge is not embedded in concrete to be destroyed by bombs; the true fortress is the will of our professors and elites," Aref wrote. "No barbarity in history has ever been able to strip science from the Iranian people. Science is rooted in our souls, and this fortress will not crumble."
The National Iranian American Council called the bombing "another outrageous, criminal act in an illegal war."
"This was a center of learning, not a military target," the group wrote on social media, highlighting video footage showing a building in ruins. "The increasing use of the Gaza playbook in Iran is deeply disturbing and will only deepen insecurity for the US and Israel. End this war."
US Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), the lone Iranian American in Congress, noted that Sharif University has "produced a huge number of engineers who’ve gone on to Silicon Valley and founded some of the most successful American tech companies."
"Why are we bombing a university in a city of 10 million people?" Ansari asked.
Another outrageous, criminal act in an illegal war: U.S.-Israeli strikes have bombed one of the world’s most prestigious universities in Sharif University of Technology in Tehran. This was a center of learning, not a military target. The increasing use of the Gaza playbook in… pic.twitter.com/GE6J8WhgMC
— NIAC (@NIACouncil) April 6, 2026
Al Jazeera's Tohid Asadi reported from Tehran that the university was "severely hit, with extensive damage reported in the compound's mosque and laboratories."
Vira Ameli, an Iranian global health researcher and lecturer at the University of Oxford, decried the US-Israeli strike on Sharif University, where she spent time as a postdoctoral fellow.
"To wake to the news of this war crime, at a distance and unable to return, is difficult to articulate," Ameli wrote. "And yet history has made one thing clear: Iran is not a country undone by bombardment."
Iranian authorities say US-Israeli attacks have hit at least 30 of the nation's universities, including the Isfahan University of Technology and the Iran University of Science and Technology. The US and Israel have justified some of the attacks by claiming the universities were involved in military-related activities.
"Would American and Israeli leaders consider their own equivalent institutions fair game? Of course not," journalist Natasha Lennard wrote in a column for The Intercept last week. "By stated US and Israeli rationale, however, were Iran able to launch airstrikes on American soil, direct ties to the U.S. and Israeli military-industrial complex would make valid targets of at least the University of California, Berkeley; the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Johns Hopkins University, among dozens of other schools."
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said "bare due diligence" would have exposed ICE officers' falsehoods.
Video footage obtained by The New York Times has exposed lies told by two federal immigration enforcement agents about the circumstances leading up to a non-fatal shooting in Minneapolis that occurred on January 14.
According to a Monday report from the Times, the video directly contradicts claims made by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that they were attacked by assailants armed with a shovel and a broom for around three minutes before the agents opened fire and wounded one of the attackers.
"Instead, the confrontation depicted in the video lasts about 12 seconds and shows two men struggling with the agent," reported the Times. "It shows no sustained attack with a shovel."
Federal prosecutors had initially pursued assault charges against Venezuelan national Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who was shot in the leg by the ICE officers during the January confrontation, and fellow Venezuelan national Alfredo Aljorna.
However, the government abruptly dropped charges against the two men in February, and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons acknowledged that two federal officers appear “to have made untruthful statements” about the incident.
The Times noted that the government had access to the video of the shooting hours after it took place.
However, one source told the paper that prosecutors didn't watch the video until three weeks after they filed charges against Sosa-Celis and Aljorna, and instead relied on "the ICE agent’s statement and an FBI agent’s affidavit describing the footage."
This revelation prompted a rebuke from Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who told the Times that "bare due diligence would have shown that the agents were lying."
Trump administration officials have come under fire in recent weeks for lying about shootings involving federal immigration officials, such as when former US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem falsely claimed that slain Minneapolis intensive care nurse Alex Pretti was aiming “to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement."
In reality, video footage showed Pretti never drew his handgun during his confrontation with federal immigration officers, while also clearly showing that officers disarmed him before they opened fire.
Noem also falsely claimed that slain ICE observer Renee Good had attempted "an act of domestic terrorism" by trying to run over a federal immigration officer with her car, even though footage clearly showed Good turning her vehicle away from the officer in an attempt to get away from the scene.
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," said a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry.
Iranian officials on Monday warned US President Donald Trump that his name will be "etched in history as a supreme war criminal" if he follows through with his threat to wage total war on Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants.
Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister, wrote on social media following Trump's Easter-morning outburst that "threats to attack power plants and bridges (civilian infrastructure) constitute war crimes under Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 (Article 52)."
"The president of the United States, in his capacity as the highest-ranking official of his country, has openly threatened to commit war crimes—an act that entails his individual criminal responsibility before the International Criminal Court and any competent national court," Gharibabadi added, vowing that Iran "will deliver a decisive, immediate, and regret-inducing response" to any attack.
Esmail Baghaei, a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, said Trump's threats are "an indication of a criminal mindset."
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," Baghaei said in an interview on Sunday. "Threatening to attack a country's critical infrastructure, energy sector, it would mean that you want to put at risk the whole population."
Absolute bombshell. Iran's Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei accuses the Trump administration of a criminal mindset and public incitement for genocide. Threatening a nation's critical infrastructure puts the entire population at risk. The White House has completely abandoned morality. pic.twitter.com/HcBZGZho5p
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 5, 2026
The US and Israel have already done significant damage to Iran's civilian infrastructure. The country's deputy health minister said Monday that more than 360 healthcare, education, and research centers have been hit by US-Israeli strikes, and dozens of medics have been killed since the bombing began on February 28.
But Trump on Sunday threatened an indiscriminate assault, telling Fox News that if the Iranians "don't make a deal and fast," he is "considering blowing everything up and taking the oil."
"You're going to see bridges and power plants dropping all over their country," the president said, setting a new deadline of 8 pm ET for the complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump's remarks came after he published a deranged post on his Truth Social platform demanding that Iran "open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell."
Analysts and lawmakers in the US echoed Iranian officials' warnings that Trump's threatened attacks would constitute war crimes.
"Trump's advisers are telling him to hit civilian sites because it will cause unrest and potentially topple the regime. But just think about the insanity of this plan: kill tens of thousands of civilians in order to cause a national panic," US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote. "Bombing to induce political panic IS A WAR CRIME."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, said that "any lawmaker who votes for supplemental funding for the war on Iran or against war powers resolutions to end it will be fully complicit in the war crimes threatened here, as well as those already committed by this unhinged and unfit Commander in Chief."
The US president's renewed threats came amid reports of a diplomatic effort, mediated in part by Pakistan, to enact a 45-day ceasefire to provide space for a lasting resolution to the war.
Axios reported that the talks are seen as "the only chance to prevent a dramatic escalation in the war that will include massive strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure and a retaliation against energy and water facilities in the Gulf states."