SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Here Are the 50 GOP Senators Who Just Sacrificed Your #BroadbandPrivacy to Corporate Profits
'Extremely disappointing that the Senate voted today to sacrifice the privacy rights of Americans in the interest of protecting the profits of major internet companies'
Mar 23, 2017
Privacy and consumer advocates--and a seemingly endless chorus of Internet users--were expressing outrage on Thursday after the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed a bill that will allow powerful media corporations to collect personal data of internet users without their consent and sell that information to the "highest bidder" for profit.
As Common Dreams previously reported, the controversial Congressional Review Act (CRA), if passed by Congress and signed by President Trump, would repeal a rule put forth the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under President Obama that forced companies to receive permission from online users before collecting or selling sensitive data, such as browsing history and search queries.
On Thursday afternoon, the Senate passed the resolution along strict party lines with a 50-48 vote. (With two senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) and Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) voting absent, the full roll call is here.) Widespread disgust was immediately focused on the 50 Republicans who voted 'yea':
Evan Greer, campaign director for the the advocacy group Fight for the Future, responded by saying that those 50 members who voted in favor "used a blatantly undemocratic Congressional procedure to gut basic protections that prevent Internet Service Providers [ISPs] like Comcast and Verizon from selling their customers personal information to marketers without their permission."
| #BroadbandPrivacy Tweets |
Online, internet users themselves were expressing their disgust with the Senate vote under the hashtag #BroadbandPrivacy.
While a major blow to consumers, the measure is seen as a clear gift to the nation's most powerful media and cable companies.
"It is extremely disappointing that the Senate voted today to sacrifice the privacy rights of Americans in the interest of protecting the profits of major internet companies, including Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in a statement. "The resolution would undo privacy rules that ensure consumers control how their most sensitive information is used. The House must now stop this resolution from moving forward and stand up for our privacy rights."
As Kate Tummarello, with the digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, explained in an action alert following the vote, the major internet service providers (ISPs) have for weeks been deploying their massive lobbying power "to get lawmakers to repeal the FCC's rules that stand between them and using even creepier ways to track and profit off of your every move online."
Tummarello warned that ultimate passage of the bill would not only "roll back the FCC's rules" instituted under the Obama administration, it would also prevent the FCC from instituting similar consumer protections in the future.
As Greer noted, the Republicans who rammed the bill through--many of whom, she noted, have accepted large campaign contributions from the industry groups who lobbied for the legislation--"should be ashamed that they allowed partisan politics and corporate corruption to strip Internet users of our right to use the web safely and privately."
Because the bill stills needs to clear the House and gain the signature of President Trump, Greer said there remains plenty of time for opponents to block to its ultimate passage.
"The controversial measure passed by a narrow margin [in the Senate]," she said. "This is evidence that many members of Congress are still scared of angering the Internet. And they should be. Internet users are increasingly aware of how legislation and FCC rules impact our basic rights, and we are prepared to fight to defend them."
Greer concluded, "The Senators who voted today to sell out their constituents privacy will soon learn that the money they get from Cable companies can't buy back our trust."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
big brothercomcastcorporate powerelectronic frontier foundationfccfight for the futurefree pressopen internettechnologyverizon
Privacy and consumer advocates--and a seemingly endless chorus of Internet users--were expressing outrage on Thursday after the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed a bill that will allow powerful media corporations to collect personal data of internet users without their consent and sell that information to the "highest bidder" for profit.
As Common Dreams previously reported, the controversial Congressional Review Act (CRA), if passed by Congress and signed by President Trump, would repeal a rule put forth the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under President Obama that forced companies to receive permission from online users before collecting or selling sensitive data, such as browsing history and search queries.
On Thursday afternoon, the Senate passed the resolution along strict party lines with a 50-48 vote. (With two senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) and Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) voting absent, the full roll call is here.) Widespread disgust was immediately focused on the 50 Republicans who voted 'yea':
Evan Greer, campaign director for the the advocacy group Fight for the Future, responded by saying that those 50 members who voted in favor "used a blatantly undemocratic Congressional procedure to gut basic protections that prevent Internet Service Providers [ISPs] like Comcast and Verizon from selling their customers personal information to marketers without their permission."
| #BroadbandPrivacy Tweets |
Online, internet users themselves were expressing their disgust with the Senate vote under the hashtag #BroadbandPrivacy.
While a major blow to consumers, the measure is seen as a clear gift to the nation's most powerful media and cable companies.
"It is extremely disappointing that the Senate voted today to sacrifice the privacy rights of Americans in the interest of protecting the profits of major internet companies, including Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in a statement. "The resolution would undo privacy rules that ensure consumers control how their most sensitive information is used. The House must now stop this resolution from moving forward and stand up for our privacy rights."
As Kate Tummarello, with the digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, explained in an action alert following the vote, the major internet service providers (ISPs) have for weeks been deploying their massive lobbying power "to get lawmakers to repeal the FCC's rules that stand between them and using even creepier ways to track and profit off of your every move online."
Tummarello warned that ultimate passage of the bill would not only "roll back the FCC's rules" instituted under the Obama administration, it would also prevent the FCC from instituting similar consumer protections in the future.
As Greer noted, the Republicans who rammed the bill through--many of whom, she noted, have accepted large campaign contributions from the industry groups who lobbied for the legislation--"should be ashamed that they allowed partisan politics and corporate corruption to strip Internet users of our right to use the web safely and privately."
Because the bill stills needs to clear the House and gain the signature of President Trump, Greer said there remains plenty of time for opponents to block to its ultimate passage.
"The controversial measure passed by a narrow margin [in the Senate]," she said. "This is evidence that many members of Congress are still scared of angering the Internet. And they should be. Internet users are increasingly aware of how legislation and FCC rules impact our basic rights, and we are prepared to fight to defend them."
Greer concluded, "The Senators who voted today to sell out their constituents privacy will soon learn that the money they get from Cable companies can't buy back our trust."
Privacy and consumer advocates--and a seemingly endless chorus of Internet users--were expressing outrage on Thursday after the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed a bill that will allow powerful media corporations to collect personal data of internet users without their consent and sell that information to the "highest bidder" for profit.
As Common Dreams previously reported, the controversial Congressional Review Act (CRA), if passed by Congress and signed by President Trump, would repeal a rule put forth the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under President Obama that forced companies to receive permission from online users before collecting or selling sensitive data, such as browsing history and search queries.
On Thursday afternoon, the Senate passed the resolution along strict party lines with a 50-48 vote. (With two senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) and Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) voting absent, the full roll call is here.) Widespread disgust was immediately focused on the 50 Republicans who voted 'yea':
Evan Greer, campaign director for the the advocacy group Fight for the Future, responded by saying that those 50 members who voted in favor "used a blatantly undemocratic Congressional procedure to gut basic protections that prevent Internet Service Providers [ISPs] like Comcast and Verizon from selling their customers personal information to marketers without their permission."
| #BroadbandPrivacy Tweets |
Online, internet users themselves were expressing their disgust with the Senate vote under the hashtag #BroadbandPrivacy.
While a major blow to consumers, the measure is seen as a clear gift to the nation's most powerful media and cable companies.
"It is extremely disappointing that the Senate voted today to sacrifice the privacy rights of Americans in the interest of protecting the profits of major internet companies, including Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in a statement. "The resolution would undo privacy rules that ensure consumers control how their most sensitive information is used. The House must now stop this resolution from moving forward and stand up for our privacy rights."
As Kate Tummarello, with the digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, explained in an action alert following the vote, the major internet service providers (ISPs) have for weeks been deploying their massive lobbying power "to get lawmakers to repeal the FCC's rules that stand between them and using even creepier ways to track and profit off of your every move online."
Tummarello warned that ultimate passage of the bill would not only "roll back the FCC's rules" instituted under the Obama administration, it would also prevent the FCC from instituting similar consumer protections in the future.
As Greer noted, the Republicans who rammed the bill through--many of whom, she noted, have accepted large campaign contributions from the industry groups who lobbied for the legislation--"should be ashamed that they allowed partisan politics and corporate corruption to strip Internet users of our right to use the web safely and privately."
Because the bill stills needs to clear the House and gain the signature of President Trump, Greer said there remains plenty of time for opponents to block to its ultimate passage.
"The controversial measure passed by a narrow margin [in the Senate]," she said. "This is evidence that many members of Congress are still scared of angering the Internet. And they should be. Internet users are increasingly aware of how legislation and FCC rules impact our basic rights, and we are prepared to fight to defend them."
Greer concluded, "The Senators who voted today to sell out their constituents privacy will soon learn that the money they get from Cable companies can't buy back our trust."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.