SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Death Spiral, Debunked: Facts Undercut Major Argument for GOP Healthcare Plan
Republicans' major argument to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act appears to be, well, bunk
Mar 15, 2017
Republicans have spun a lot of stories in their desperate attempt to sell the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare--and among their favorites is the narrative that the law is "imploding," in a "death spiral," or otherwise doomed to fail.
There are two problems with that argument. First of all, Obamacare is not, in fact, "collapsing." And secondly, to the extent the ACA is experiencing problems, much of the blame can be placed directly at the feet of Republicans and the insurance companies to whom they are beholden.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis released this week on the GOP's replacement plan, the American Healthcare Act (AHCA), further exposes the "death spiral" talking point as a myth: "According to the budget office," the New York Times wrote Wednesday, "the Obamacare markets will remain stable over the long run, if there are no significant changes."
"Growing evidence suggests that the markets, despite their problems, are far from collapse," continued Times reporters Reed Abelson and Margot Sanger-Katz. "Because of how the current subsidies work, people were generally shielded from this year's higher prices, and enrollment has remained steady. Several recent analyses argue that this year's increase was a market correction, and that a smoother market would follow in the years ahead."
Vox added, "the notion of 'implosion' has given the campaign for a massive rewrite a sense of urgency that, according to the CBO, is basically unwarranted."
Furthermore, the problems identified by GOP critics--insurers pulling out, a slight decline in enrollment for 2017--have actually been caused by Republicans themselves.
Under the Trump administration and the new GOP Congress, Republicans "withdrew TV and online advertising encouraging people to sign up for coverage during the crucial period before the deadline," opinion writer Dana Milbank noted Tuesday at the Washington Post. "The White House issued an executive order and took other actions that strongly implied it would no longer enforce the 'individual mandate' requiring people to sign up for coverage. And the constant promises of imminent repeal have spooked both insurers and individuals from participating."
"[President Donald] Trump and congressional allies have, in short, created a self-fulfilling expectation of collapse," Milbank continued.
And the evidence they've used to support this strategy was spurious at best. Take, for example, Trump's tweet in February that amplified Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini's claim that Obamacare was, to use the Republican jargon, in a "death spiral."
Indeed, the massive insurance company had blamed Obamacare losses for its decision to pull out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing ACA individual insurance--a decision that was later exposed as a bargaining chip in its failed effort to achieve a controversial merger with Humana.
Regardless of the company's motivations, its threat and subsequent follow-through "certainly was effective in terms of its impact on the Affordable Care Act, since Aetna's withdrawal has become part of the Republican brief against the law," Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik wrote in January. "That it says so much more about Aetna executives' honesty and integrity probably won't get cited much by GOP functionaries trying to repeal the law. Aetna is at least partially responsible for placing the health coverage of more than 20 million Americans in jeopardy; that it did so at least partially to promote a merger that would bring few benefits, if any, to its customers is an additional black mark."
Meanwhile, a report issued this month by the left-leaning Century Foundation shows that if anything will send the nation's healthcare system toward collapse, it may just be the AHCA itself.
The proposal, the foundation charged, "would not provide meaningful coverage for people with pre-existing conditions--and could result in millions of Americans with and without pre-existing conditions left with no affordable health plan options, even potentially at any cost due to insurance market instability, or even an insurance market death spiral."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Republicans have spun a lot of stories in their desperate attempt to sell the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare--and among their favorites is the narrative that the law is "imploding," in a "death spiral," or otherwise doomed to fail.
There are two problems with that argument. First of all, Obamacare is not, in fact, "collapsing." And secondly, to the extent the ACA is experiencing problems, much of the blame can be placed directly at the feet of Republicans and the insurance companies to whom they are beholden.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis released this week on the GOP's replacement plan, the American Healthcare Act (AHCA), further exposes the "death spiral" talking point as a myth: "According to the budget office," the New York Times wrote Wednesday, "the Obamacare markets will remain stable over the long run, if there are no significant changes."
"Growing evidence suggests that the markets, despite their problems, are far from collapse," continued Times reporters Reed Abelson and Margot Sanger-Katz. "Because of how the current subsidies work, people were generally shielded from this year's higher prices, and enrollment has remained steady. Several recent analyses argue that this year's increase was a market correction, and that a smoother market would follow in the years ahead."
Vox added, "the notion of 'implosion' has given the campaign for a massive rewrite a sense of urgency that, according to the CBO, is basically unwarranted."
Furthermore, the problems identified by GOP critics--insurers pulling out, a slight decline in enrollment for 2017--have actually been caused by Republicans themselves.
Under the Trump administration and the new GOP Congress, Republicans "withdrew TV and online advertising encouraging people to sign up for coverage during the crucial period before the deadline," opinion writer Dana Milbank noted Tuesday at the Washington Post. "The White House issued an executive order and took other actions that strongly implied it would no longer enforce the 'individual mandate' requiring people to sign up for coverage. And the constant promises of imminent repeal have spooked both insurers and individuals from participating."
"[President Donald] Trump and congressional allies have, in short, created a self-fulfilling expectation of collapse," Milbank continued.
And the evidence they've used to support this strategy was spurious at best. Take, for example, Trump's tweet in February that amplified Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini's claim that Obamacare was, to use the Republican jargon, in a "death spiral."
Indeed, the massive insurance company had blamed Obamacare losses for its decision to pull out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing ACA individual insurance--a decision that was later exposed as a bargaining chip in its failed effort to achieve a controversial merger with Humana.
Regardless of the company's motivations, its threat and subsequent follow-through "certainly was effective in terms of its impact on the Affordable Care Act, since Aetna's withdrawal has become part of the Republican brief against the law," Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik wrote in January. "That it says so much more about Aetna executives' honesty and integrity probably won't get cited much by GOP functionaries trying to repeal the law. Aetna is at least partially responsible for placing the health coverage of more than 20 million Americans in jeopardy; that it did so at least partially to promote a merger that would bring few benefits, if any, to its customers is an additional black mark."
Meanwhile, a report issued this month by the left-leaning Century Foundation shows that if anything will send the nation's healthcare system toward collapse, it may just be the AHCA itself.
The proposal, the foundation charged, "would not provide meaningful coverage for people with pre-existing conditions--and could result in millions of Americans with and without pre-existing conditions left with no affordable health plan options, even potentially at any cost due to insurance market instability, or even an insurance market death spiral."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Republicans have spun a lot of stories in their desperate attempt to sell the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare--and among their favorites is the narrative that the law is "imploding," in a "death spiral," or otherwise doomed to fail.
There are two problems with that argument. First of all, Obamacare is not, in fact, "collapsing." And secondly, to the extent the ACA is experiencing problems, much of the blame can be placed directly at the feet of Republicans and the insurance companies to whom they are beholden.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis released this week on the GOP's replacement plan, the American Healthcare Act (AHCA), further exposes the "death spiral" talking point as a myth: "According to the budget office," the New York Times wrote Wednesday, "the Obamacare markets will remain stable over the long run, if there are no significant changes."
"Growing evidence suggests that the markets, despite their problems, are far from collapse," continued Times reporters Reed Abelson and Margot Sanger-Katz. "Because of how the current subsidies work, people were generally shielded from this year's higher prices, and enrollment has remained steady. Several recent analyses argue that this year's increase was a market correction, and that a smoother market would follow in the years ahead."
Vox added, "the notion of 'implosion' has given the campaign for a massive rewrite a sense of urgency that, according to the CBO, is basically unwarranted."
Furthermore, the problems identified by GOP critics--insurers pulling out, a slight decline in enrollment for 2017--have actually been caused by Republicans themselves.
Under the Trump administration and the new GOP Congress, Republicans "withdrew TV and online advertising encouraging people to sign up for coverage during the crucial period before the deadline," opinion writer Dana Milbank noted Tuesday at the Washington Post. "The White House issued an executive order and took other actions that strongly implied it would no longer enforce the 'individual mandate' requiring people to sign up for coverage. And the constant promises of imminent repeal have spooked both insurers and individuals from participating."
"[President Donald] Trump and congressional allies have, in short, created a self-fulfilling expectation of collapse," Milbank continued.
And the evidence they've used to support this strategy was spurious at best. Take, for example, Trump's tweet in February that amplified Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini's claim that Obamacare was, to use the Republican jargon, in a "death spiral."
Indeed, the massive insurance company had blamed Obamacare losses for its decision to pull out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing ACA individual insurance--a decision that was later exposed as a bargaining chip in its failed effort to achieve a controversial merger with Humana.
Regardless of the company's motivations, its threat and subsequent follow-through "certainly was effective in terms of its impact on the Affordable Care Act, since Aetna's withdrawal has become part of the Republican brief against the law," Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik wrote in January. "That it says so much more about Aetna executives' honesty and integrity probably won't get cited much by GOP functionaries trying to repeal the law. Aetna is at least partially responsible for placing the health coverage of more than 20 million Americans in jeopardy; that it did so at least partially to promote a merger that would bring few benefits, if any, to its customers is an additional black mark."
Meanwhile, a report issued this month by the left-leaning Century Foundation shows that if anything will send the nation's healthcare system toward collapse, it may just be the AHCA itself.
The proposal, the foundation charged, "would not provide meaningful coverage for people with pre-existing conditions--and could result in millions of Americans with and without pre-existing conditions left with no affordable health plan options, even potentially at any cost due to insurance market instability, or even an insurance market death spiral."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.