

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Portending risks to "the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the planet we love," the U.S. Senate on Friday confirmed Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The 52-46 vote comes a day after an Oklahoma judge said Pruitt was in violation of the state's Open Records Act and ordered the release of thousands of emails between his office and fossil fuel companies. Senate Democrats said that warranted a delay on Pruitt's confirmation, but Republicans pushed the vote ahead.
Senators Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Joe Manchin, (D-W.Va.) joined Republicans to vote in favor of Pruitt; thus, wrote Esquire's Charles Pierce, "we must assume that two Democratic senators think that having a climate denialist in charge of national environmental policy is a good deal."
Manchin, for his part, was the sole Democrat to join Republicans to vote in favor of Steven Mnuchin heading the Treasury Secretary and confirm Jeff Sessions as U.S. attorney general. Republican Susan Collins (Maine), meanwhile, was the only Republican to vote against Pruitt.
Given the EPA's mission "to protect human health and the environment," Pruitt's strong ties to the fossil fuel industry, hostility to the very agency he now leads, and uncertainty on climate science had sparked fierce outcry from advocacy groups, EPA workers, and Democratic lawmakers.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), for one, described Pruitt as a "God awful nominee" who had "established himself as the tool and the minion of the fossil fuel industry," while Rep. Barbara Lee (Calif.) tweeted Friday that his "confirmation shows once again that Republicans will deny climate change and protect the interests of Big Oil at all costs."
Environmental groups reacted to Pruitt's confirmation with warnings over what having a "fossil fuel industry puppet" at the helm of the EPA would mean.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of advocacy group Food & Water Watch, for example, said the confirmation "begins the fight of a lifetime to protect public health, our environment, climate stability, and even the simple sanctity of the EPA itself."
Predicting Pruitt to "be the worst, most dangerous administrator in EPA history," Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, warned: "We'll be drinking dirtier water and breathing dirtier air because of this disturbing decision, and our wildlife and climate will pay a terrible price."
And for climate movement 350.org, it's important to see the latest development in the context of the Trump administration's greater attack on regulations, science, and the EPA itself.
"[B]ut we won't let them get away with it," said 350.org executive director May Boeve. "The resistance to this administration's corruption and greed is growing, and we're coming together to fight the systems attempting to divide us and build the brighter world we know is possible."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Portending risks to "the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the planet we love," the U.S. Senate on Friday confirmed Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The 52-46 vote comes a day after an Oklahoma judge said Pruitt was in violation of the state's Open Records Act and ordered the release of thousands of emails between his office and fossil fuel companies. Senate Democrats said that warranted a delay on Pruitt's confirmation, but Republicans pushed the vote ahead.
Senators Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Joe Manchin, (D-W.Va.) joined Republicans to vote in favor of Pruitt; thus, wrote Esquire's Charles Pierce, "we must assume that two Democratic senators think that having a climate denialist in charge of national environmental policy is a good deal."
Manchin, for his part, was the sole Democrat to join Republicans to vote in favor of Steven Mnuchin heading the Treasury Secretary and confirm Jeff Sessions as U.S. attorney general. Republican Susan Collins (Maine), meanwhile, was the only Republican to vote against Pruitt.
Given the EPA's mission "to protect human health and the environment," Pruitt's strong ties to the fossil fuel industry, hostility to the very agency he now leads, and uncertainty on climate science had sparked fierce outcry from advocacy groups, EPA workers, and Democratic lawmakers.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), for one, described Pruitt as a "God awful nominee" who had "established himself as the tool and the minion of the fossil fuel industry," while Rep. Barbara Lee (Calif.) tweeted Friday that his "confirmation shows once again that Republicans will deny climate change and protect the interests of Big Oil at all costs."
Environmental groups reacted to Pruitt's confirmation with warnings over what having a "fossil fuel industry puppet" at the helm of the EPA would mean.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of advocacy group Food & Water Watch, for example, said the confirmation "begins the fight of a lifetime to protect public health, our environment, climate stability, and even the simple sanctity of the EPA itself."
Predicting Pruitt to "be the worst, most dangerous administrator in EPA history," Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, warned: "We'll be drinking dirtier water and breathing dirtier air because of this disturbing decision, and our wildlife and climate will pay a terrible price."
And for climate movement 350.org, it's important to see the latest development in the context of the Trump administration's greater attack on regulations, science, and the EPA itself.
"[B]ut we won't let them get away with it," said 350.org executive director May Boeve. "The resistance to this administration's corruption and greed is growing, and we're coming together to fight the systems attempting to divide us and build the brighter world we know is possible."
Portending risks to "the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the planet we love," the U.S. Senate on Friday confirmed Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The 52-46 vote comes a day after an Oklahoma judge said Pruitt was in violation of the state's Open Records Act and ordered the release of thousands of emails between his office and fossil fuel companies. Senate Democrats said that warranted a delay on Pruitt's confirmation, but Republicans pushed the vote ahead.
Senators Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Joe Manchin, (D-W.Va.) joined Republicans to vote in favor of Pruitt; thus, wrote Esquire's Charles Pierce, "we must assume that two Democratic senators think that having a climate denialist in charge of national environmental policy is a good deal."
Manchin, for his part, was the sole Democrat to join Republicans to vote in favor of Steven Mnuchin heading the Treasury Secretary and confirm Jeff Sessions as U.S. attorney general. Republican Susan Collins (Maine), meanwhile, was the only Republican to vote against Pruitt.
Given the EPA's mission "to protect human health and the environment," Pruitt's strong ties to the fossil fuel industry, hostility to the very agency he now leads, and uncertainty on climate science had sparked fierce outcry from advocacy groups, EPA workers, and Democratic lawmakers.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), for one, described Pruitt as a "God awful nominee" who had "established himself as the tool and the minion of the fossil fuel industry," while Rep. Barbara Lee (Calif.) tweeted Friday that his "confirmation shows once again that Republicans will deny climate change and protect the interests of Big Oil at all costs."
Environmental groups reacted to Pruitt's confirmation with warnings over what having a "fossil fuel industry puppet" at the helm of the EPA would mean.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of advocacy group Food & Water Watch, for example, said the confirmation "begins the fight of a lifetime to protect public health, our environment, climate stability, and even the simple sanctity of the EPA itself."
Predicting Pruitt to "be the worst, most dangerous administrator in EPA history," Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, warned: "We'll be drinking dirtier water and breathing dirtier air because of this disturbing decision, and our wildlife and climate will pay a terrible price."
And for climate movement 350.org, it's important to see the latest development in the context of the Trump administration's greater attack on regulations, science, and the EPA itself.
"[B]ut we won't let them get away with it," said 350.org executive director May Boeve. "The resistance to this administration's corruption and greed is growing, and we're coming together to fight the systems attempting to divide us and build the brighter world we know is possible."