Public Outrage, Not Trump's Tepid Rebuke, Upends GOP Attack on Ethics Panel
Trump wasn't against gutting the independent congressional watchdog, point out critics, just the "timing" of the move
Following an overnight public relations disaster that followed a Republican Party vote to eviscerate the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, GOP lawmakers made an abrupt u-turn on Tuesday by withdrawing the reform proposal before a final vote on a package of rules that will guide the new legislative session.
In the wake of the development, many news outlets (ex. here, here, here) reported that it was a two-part tweet sent out by President-elect Donald Trump that may have compelled the Republicans to change course.
But despite the high-profile tweets, it was certainly unclear what role, if any, Trump had on the decision. As The Hill pointed out, even "before Trump weighed in, a barrage of negative headlines and public outcry made it difficult for Republicans to stand by the measure."
And filmmaker Michael Moore--who earlier in the day had posted a message on Facebook urging consituents to call and admonish their Republican representatives for moving to gut the ethics watchdog--was among those celebrating the idea that it was public pressure, not Trump's social media foray, which had upended the Republicans:
Moore also critized outlets for so quickly giving Trump credit for Tuesday's turnaround:
Simon Maloy, writing for Salon, agreed with the essentials of Moore's argument.
"Trump's position on this was clear," Maloy wrote on Tuesday. "He didn't have a problem with Republicans going after the 'unfair' OCE, he just mildly suggested that maybe it shouldn't have been the first thing on the agenda.... But once this Twitter statement was sent, the political media tripped all over themselves to be the first to inaccurately report that Trump and the House GOP were at odds over ethics."
As Moore tweeted:
Meanwhile, the Huffington Post's Ryan Grim said the whole situation was revealing in important ways.
"The about-face is significant because it is a strong signal, if one were needed, that public opinion still matters," Grim observed in his reporting. "Despite losing the popular vote for the White House and getting fewer overall votes for Senate seats than Democratic candidates, Republicans are on the verge of controlling all three branches of government, and have telegraphed their intention to ram through the most aggressive agenda possible. Tuesday's faceplant suggests less may be possible than Republicans think."
Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division, also credited the role of public pressure. "Public outrage over House Republican's appalling, secretive midnight actions to embolden corruption and congressional profiteering in the coming congress has forced the House GOP to reverse course," Gilbert said in a statement.
But both Gilbert and Daniel Schuman, policy director of grassroots activist organization Demand Progress, said that while this should be seen as a small yet significant victory against Republican overreach, it is still likely just a taste of what's to come.
"This is not the last bad idea to be offered this Congress. The American people will not stand for business as usual. We will be watching," Schuman said.
And Gilbert added that while "it's great that public pressure forced this reversal, the readiness of the House Caucus to pursue this action is a profoundly troubling signal of what we should expect in the years to come."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Following an overnight public relations disaster that followed a Republican Party vote to eviscerate the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, GOP lawmakers made an abrupt u-turn on Tuesday by withdrawing the reform proposal before a final vote on a package of rules that will guide the new legislative session.
In the wake of the development, many news outlets (ex. here, here, here) reported that it was a two-part tweet sent out by President-elect Donald Trump that may have compelled the Republicans to change course.
But despite the high-profile tweets, it was certainly unclear what role, if any, Trump had on the decision. As The Hill pointed out, even "before Trump weighed in, a barrage of negative headlines and public outcry made it difficult for Republicans to stand by the measure."
And filmmaker Michael Moore--who earlier in the day had posted a message on Facebook urging consituents to call and admonish their Republican representatives for moving to gut the ethics watchdog--was among those celebrating the idea that it was public pressure, not Trump's social media foray, which had upended the Republicans:
Moore also critized outlets for so quickly giving Trump credit for Tuesday's turnaround:
Simon Maloy, writing for Salon, agreed with the essentials of Moore's argument.
"Trump's position on this was clear," Maloy wrote on Tuesday. "He didn't have a problem with Republicans going after the 'unfair' OCE, he just mildly suggested that maybe it shouldn't have been the first thing on the agenda.... But once this Twitter statement was sent, the political media tripped all over themselves to be the first to inaccurately report that Trump and the House GOP were at odds over ethics."
As Moore tweeted:
Meanwhile, the Huffington Post's Ryan Grim said the whole situation was revealing in important ways.
"The about-face is significant because it is a strong signal, if one were needed, that public opinion still matters," Grim observed in his reporting. "Despite losing the popular vote for the White House and getting fewer overall votes for Senate seats than Democratic candidates, Republicans are on the verge of controlling all three branches of government, and have telegraphed their intention to ram through the most aggressive agenda possible. Tuesday's faceplant suggests less may be possible than Republicans think."
Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division, also credited the role of public pressure. "Public outrage over House Republican's appalling, secretive midnight actions to embolden corruption and congressional profiteering in the coming congress has forced the House GOP to reverse course," Gilbert said in a statement.
But both Gilbert and Daniel Schuman, policy director of grassroots activist organization Demand Progress, said that while this should be seen as a small yet significant victory against Republican overreach, it is still likely just a taste of what's to come.
"This is not the last bad idea to be offered this Congress. The American people will not stand for business as usual. We will be watching," Schuman said.
And Gilbert added that while "it's great that public pressure forced this reversal, the readiness of the House Caucus to pursue this action is a profoundly troubling signal of what we should expect in the years to come."
Following an overnight public relations disaster that followed a Republican Party vote to eviscerate the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, GOP lawmakers made an abrupt u-turn on Tuesday by withdrawing the reform proposal before a final vote on a package of rules that will guide the new legislative session.
In the wake of the development, many news outlets (ex. here, here, here) reported that it was a two-part tweet sent out by President-elect Donald Trump that may have compelled the Republicans to change course.
But despite the high-profile tweets, it was certainly unclear what role, if any, Trump had on the decision. As The Hill pointed out, even "before Trump weighed in, a barrage of negative headlines and public outcry made it difficult for Republicans to stand by the measure."
And filmmaker Michael Moore--who earlier in the day had posted a message on Facebook urging consituents to call and admonish their Republican representatives for moving to gut the ethics watchdog--was among those celebrating the idea that it was public pressure, not Trump's social media foray, which had upended the Republicans:
Moore also critized outlets for so quickly giving Trump credit for Tuesday's turnaround:
Simon Maloy, writing for Salon, agreed with the essentials of Moore's argument.
"Trump's position on this was clear," Maloy wrote on Tuesday. "He didn't have a problem with Republicans going after the 'unfair' OCE, he just mildly suggested that maybe it shouldn't have been the first thing on the agenda.... But once this Twitter statement was sent, the political media tripped all over themselves to be the first to inaccurately report that Trump and the House GOP were at odds over ethics."
As Moore tweeted:
Meanwhile, the Huffington Post's Ryan Grim said the whole situation was revealing in important ways.
"The about-face is significant because it is a strong signal, if one were needed, that public opinion still matters," Grim observed in his reporting. "Despite losing the popular vote for the White House and getting fewer overall votes for Senate seats than Democratic candidates, Republicans are on the verge of controlling all three branches of government, and have telegraphed their intention to ram through the most aggressive agenda possible. Tuesday's faceplant suggests less may be possible than Republicans think."
Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division, also credited the role of public pressure. "Public outrage over House Republican's appalling, secretive midnight actions to embolden corruption and congressional profiteering in the coming congress has forced the House GOP to reverse course," Gilbert said in a statement.
But both Gilbert and Daniel Schuman, policy director of grassroots activist organization Demand Progress, said that while this should be seen as a small yet significant victory against Republican overreach, it is still likely just a taste of what's to come.
"This is not the last bad idea to be offered this Congress. The American people will not stand for business as usual. We will be watching," Schuman said.
And Gilbert added that while "it's great that public pressure forced this reversal, the readiness of the House Caucus to pursue this action is a profoundly troubling signal of what we should expect in the years to come."