

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As the United States embarks on its first presidential election in 50 years without a fully operable Voting Rights Act (VRA), a coalition of close to 90 voting and civil rights groups is calling on state election officials to ensure that no one is disenfranchised at the ballot box on November 8.
"As you know, the VRA protected the voting rights of racial and ethnic minorities in several states and local jurisdictions where they had been historically discriminated against in voting," reads the letter (pdf) sent Wednesday from groups including the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the NAACP, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Friends of the Earth-U.S., and the League of Women Voters.
But those protections were hobbled in 2013 by the U.S. Supreme Court's "devastating decision" in Shelby County v. Holder, the letter notes. "Following Shelby, numerous states have passed voting laws, which several federal courts agree have a disparate impact on people of color and language minorities." Read Common Dreams' coverage of the fallout here.
"Since Congress has failed to pass a bill to restore the VRA...we are extremely concerned that there will be widespread voter discrimination in the upcoming presidential election," the groups continue.
What's more, they point to recent news that, as a result of Shelby, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is scaling back its deployment of election observers during this year's presidential election. "The potentially detrimental effect of the absence of this critical voter protection tool cannot be overstated," the letter reads.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on."
--Wade Henderson, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
On top of all this, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been stoking fears of a "rigged election" on the campaign trail, calling on supporters to monitor polling places on Election Day and going as far as to recruit "Trump Election Observers" through his campaign website.
Civil rights groups have expressed alarm over Trump's call, with Kristen Clarke of the nonprofit Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law recently warning: "Poll watchers left unchecked may unfairly target minority voters."
Meanwhile, the legal back-and-forth over restrictive voting laws in the wake of Shelby has led to misunderstandings--intentional and not--on the part of both voters and election officials. A Pew Research Center survey released earlier this week showed that many Americans remain confused about their state's voter ID laws; while a New York Times story on Tuesday suggested that "a host of factors--foot-dragging by states, confusion among voters, the inability of judges to completely roll back bias--are blunting the effect of court rulings against the laws."
The gutting of the VRA, a patchwork of voting laws, and "the most racially bigoted presidential campaign in generations has created a perfect storm for voter intimidation and voter discrimination," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, on Wednesday.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on," he added, "by creating and publicizing clear plans to prevent intimidation and discrimination, and to make it unequivocally clear to the voters they serve that the elections they oversee will be safe, fair, and free from intimidation, violence, and discrimination."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the United States embarks on its first presidential election in 50 years without a fully operable Voting Rights Act (VRA), a coalition of close to 90 voting and civil rights groups is calling on state election officials to ensure that no one is disenfranchised at the ballot box on November 8.
"As you know, the VRA protected the voting rights of racial and ethnic minorities in several states and local jurisdictions where they had been historically discriminated against in voting," reads the letter (pdf) sent Wednesday from groups including the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the NAACP, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Friends of the Earth-U.S., and the League of Women Voters.
But those protections were hobbled in 2013 by the U.S. Supreme Court's "devastating decision" in Shelby County v. Holder, the letter notes. "Following Shelby, numerous states have passed voting laws, which several federal courts agree have a disparate impact on people of color and language minorities." Read Common Dreams' coverage of the fallout here.
"Since Congress has failed to pass a bill to restore the VRA...we are extremely concerned that there will be widespread voter discrimination in the upcoming presidential election," the groups continue.
What's more, they point to recent news that, as a result of Shelby, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is scaling back its deployment of election observers during this year's presidential election. "The potentially detrimental effect of the absence of this critical voter protection tool cannot be overstated," the letter reads.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on."
--Wade Henderson, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
On top of all this, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been stoking fears of a "rigged election" on the campaign trail, calling on supporters to monitor polling places on Election Day and going as far as to recruit "Trump Election Observers" through his campaign website.
Civil rights groups have expressed alarm over Trump's call, with Kristen Clarke of the nonprofit Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law recently warning: "Poll watchers left unchecked may unfairly target minority voters."
Meanwhile, the legal back-and-forth over restrictive voting laws in the wake of Shelby has led to misunderstandings--intentional and not--on the part of both voters and election officials. A Pew Research Center survey released earlier this week showed that many Americans remain confused about their state's voter ID laws; while a New York Times story on Tuesday suggested that "a host of factors--foot-dragging by states, confusion among voters, the inability of judges to completely roll back bias--are blunting the effect of court rulings against the laws."
The gutting of the VRA, a patchwork of voting laws, and "the most racially bigoted presidential campaign in generations has created a perfect storm for voter intimidation and voter discrimination," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, on Wednesday.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on," he added, "by creating and publicizing clear plans to prevent intimidation and discrimination, and to make it unequivocally clear to the voters they serve that the elections they oversee will be safe, fair, and free from intimidation, violence, and discrimination."
As the United States embarks on its first presidential election in 50 years without a fully operable Voting Rights Act (VRA), a coalition of close to 90 voting and civil rights groups is calling on state election officials to ensure that no one is disenfranchised at the ballot box on November 8.
"As you know, the VRA protected the voting rights of racial and ethnic minorities in several states and local jurisdictions where they had been historically discriminated against in voting," reads the letter (pdf) sent Wednesday from groups including the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the NAACP, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Friends of the Earth-U.S., and the League of Women Voters.
But those protections were hobbled in 2013 by the U.S. Supreme Court's "devastating decision" in Shelby County v. Holder, the letter notes. "Following Shelby, numerous states have passed voting laws, which several federal courts agree have a disparate impact on people of color and language minorities." Read Common Dreams' coverage of the fallout here.
"Since Congress has failed to pass a bill to restore the VRA...we are extremely concerned that there will be widespread voter discrimination in the upcoming presidential election," the groups continue.
What's more, they point to recent news that, as a result of Shelby, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is scaling back its deployment of election observers during this year's presidential election. "The potentially detrimental effect of the absence of this critical voter protection tool cannot be overstated," the letter reads.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on."
--Wade Henderson, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
On top of all this, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been stoking fears of a "rigged election" on the campaign trail, calling on supporters to monitor polling places on Election Day and going as far as to recruit "Trump Election Observers" through his campaign website.
Civil rights groups have expressed alarm over Trump's call, with Kristen Clarke of the nonprofit Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law recently warning: "Poll watchers left unchecked may unfairly target minority voters."
Meanwhile, the legal back-and-forth over restrictive voting laws in the wake of Shelby has led to misunderstandings--intentional and not--on the part of both voters and election officials. A Pew Research Center survey released earlier this week showed that many Americans remain confused about their state's voter ID laws; while a New York Times story on Tuesday suggested that "a host of factors--foot-dragging by states, confusion among voters, the inability of judges to completely roll back bias--are blunting the effect of court rulings against the laws."
The gutting of the VRA, a patchwork of voting laws, and "the most racially bigoted presidential campaign in generations has created a perfect storm for voter intimidation and voter discrimination," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, on Wednesday.
"State election officials must address these unprecedented threats head on," he added, "by creating and publicizing clear plans to prevent intimidation and discrimination, and to make it unequivocally clear to the voters they serve that the elections they oversee will be safe, fair, and free from intimidation, violence, and discrimination."