

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Newly declassified papers on the U.S. government's role in Argentina's 1976-83 "Dirty War" have been released, detailing--among other things--how former secretary of state Henry Kissinger stymied attempts to end mass killings of dissidents.
The files were published just after Politico reported that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is courting Kissinger's support, among other Republican elites.
Kissinger lauded Argentina's military dictatorship for its "campaign against terrorism," which included the imprisonment, torture, and killings of tens of thousands of leftist activists and students, the files reveal.
"His praise for the Argentine government in its campaign against terrorism was the music the Argentine government was longing to hear," one document states.
During a private meeting with the conservative diplomat group Argentinian Council of International Relations (CARI), Kissinger said that "in his opinion the government of Argentina had done an outstanding job in wiping out terrorist forces."
U.S. ambassador to Buenos Aires, Raul Castro warned that Kissinger's praise for the military dictatorship "may have gone to some considerable extent to his hosts' heads."
"There is some danger that Argentines may use Kissinger's laudatory statements as justification for hardening their human rights stance," Castro said.
Clinton herself has come under considerable scrutiny for her role in other U.S.-backed coups in Latin America, such as Honduras.
Further, during a presidential debate with then-rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in February, Clinton cited Kissinger as someone she looks to for advice and approval on foreign policy; Sanders called that reference "rather amazing," stating, "I happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of state in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from Kissinger."
On Tuesday, following Politico's report, progressives called on Sanders and his surrogates to withdraw their support of Clinton if she allies with Kissinger.
As Greg Grandin writes at The Nation:
If Sanders stands for anything, it is the promise of decency and civil equality, qualities that he has worked hard to bestow on Clinton since the Democratic National Convention. By accepting Kissinger's endorsement, Clinton wouldn't just be mocking that gift. She'd be sending the clearest signal yet to grassroots peace and social-justice Democrats that her presidency wouldn't be a "popular front" against Trumpian fascism. It would be bloody business as usual.
Elsewhere in the documents--released on President Barack Obama's order in a gesture of goodwill toward Argentina--U.S. diplomats and officials can be seen wondering whether their foreign policies had gotten out of control.
The National Security Council's Latin America director, Robert Pastor, wrote in a dispatch to then-President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Have we gone too far? Have we pushed our policy beyond its effectiveness? Are we pushing the Argentines over the edge and jeopardizing our future relationship? Does the terror justify the repression?"
"I, myself, believe that we may have...pushed too far," Pastor wrote.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Newly declassified papers on the U.S. government's role in Argentina's 1976-83 "Dirty War" have been released, detailing--among other things--how former secretary of state Henry Kissinger stymied attempts to end mass killings of dissidents.
The files were published just after Politico reported that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is courting Kissinger's support, among other Republican elites.
Kissinger lauded Argentina's military dictatorship for its "campaign against terrorism," which included the imprisonment, torture, and killings of tens of thousands of leftist activists and students, the files reveal.
"His praise for the Argentine government in its campaign against terrorism was the music the Argentine government was longing to hear," one document states.
During a private meeting with the conservative diplomat group Argentinian Council of International Relations (CARI), Kissinger said that "in his opinion the government of Argentina had done an outstanding job in wiping out terrorist forces."
U.S. ambassador to Buenos Aires, Raul Castro warned that Kissinger's praise for the military dictatorship "may have gone to some considerable extent to his hosts' heads."
"There is some danger that Argentines may use Kissinger's laudatory statements as justification for hardening their human rights stance," Castro said.
Clinton herself has come under considerable scrutiny for her role in other U.S.-backed coups in Latin America, such as Honduras.
Further, during a presidential debate with then-rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in February, Clinton cited Kissinger as someone she looks to for advice and approval on foreign policy; Sanders called that reference "rather amazing," stating, "I happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of state in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from Kissinger."
On Tuesday, following Politico's report, progressives called on Sanders and his surrogates to withdraw their support of Clinton if she allies with Kissinger.
As Greg Grandin writes at The Nation:
If Sanders stands for anything, it is the promise of decency and civil equality, qualities that he has worked hard to bestow on Clinton since the Democratic National Convention. By accepting Kissinger's endorsement, Clinton wouldn't just be mocking that gift. She'd be sending the clearest signal yet to grassroots peace and social-justice Democrats that her presidency wouldn't be a "popular front" against Trumpian fascism. It would be bloody business as usual.
Elsewhere in the documents--released on President Barack Obama's order in a gesture of goodwill toward Argentina--U.S. diplomats and officials can be seen wondering whether their foreign policies had gotten out of control.
The National Security Council's Latin America director, Robert Pastor, wrote in a dispatch to then-President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Have we gone too far? Have we pushed our policy beyond its effectiveness? Are we pushing the Argentines over the edge and jeopardizing our future relationship? Does the terror justify the repression?"
"I, myself, believe that we may have...pushed too far," Pastor wrote.
Newly declassified papers on the U.S. government's role in Argentina's 1976-83 "Dirty War" have been released, detailing--among other things--how former secretary of state Henry Kissinger stymied attempts to end mass killings of dissidents.
The files were published just after Politico reported that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is courting Kissinger's support, among other Republican elites.
Kissinger lauded Argentina's military dictatorship for its "campaign against terrorism," which included the imprisonment, torture, and killings of tens of thousands of leftist activists and students, the files reveal.
"His praise for the Argentine government in its campaign against terrorism was the music the Argentine government was longing to hear," one document states.
During a private meeting with the conservative diplomat group Argentinian Council of International Relations (CARI), Kissinger said that "in his opinion the government of Argentina had done an outstanding job in wiping out terrorist forces."
U.S. ambassador to Buenos Aires, Raul Castro warned that Kissinger's praise for the military dictatorship "may have gone to some considerable extent to his hosts' heads."
"There is some danger that Argentines may use Kissinger's laudatory statements as justification for hardening their human rights stance," Castro said.
Clinton herself has come under considerable scrutiny for her role in other U.S.-backed coups in Latin America, such as Honduras.
Further, during a presidential debate with then-rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in February, Clinton cited Kissinger as someone she looks to for advice and approval on foreign policy; Sanders called that reference "rather amazing," stating, "I happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of state in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from Kissinger."
On Tuesday, following Politico's report, progressives called on Sanders and his surrogates to withdraw their support of Clinton if she allies with Kissinger.
As Greg Grandin writes at The Nation:
If Sanders stands for anything, it is the promise of decency and civil equality, qualities that he has worked hard to bestow on Clinton since the Democratic National Convention. By accepting Kissinger's endorsement, Clinton wouldn't just be mocking that gift. She'd be sending the clearest signal yet to grassroots peace and social-justice Democrats that her presidency wouldn't be a "popular front" against Trumpian fascism. It would be bloody business as usual.
Elsewhere in the documents--released on President Barack Obama's order in a gesture of goodwill toward Argentina--U.S. diplomats and officials can be seen wondering whether their foreign policies had gotten out of control.
The National Security Council's Latin America director, Robert Pastor, wrote in a dispatch to then-President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Have we gone too far? Have we pushed our policy beyond its effectiveness? Are we pushing the Argentines over the edge and jeopardizing our future relationship? Does the terror justify the repression?"
"I, myself, believe that we may have...pushed too far," Pastor wrote.