Key Issue Ignored by Presidential Candidates: Food
'Presidential candidates should seize the opportunity to improve the nation's food and farm system for the benefit of us all'
"Why don't candidates talk about food?"
That's a question asked by the Des Moines Register's editorial board this weekend, who also pointed out that the "first-in-the nation caucuses are held in one of the world's great agricultural centers."
It should be a major issue for presidential candidates, the Register says, because
What we eat and how it's produced are not jokes. These questions involve many of the nation's major issues -- including health care costs and quality, the federal debt, pollution, jobs and immigration -- and they require leadership on the presidential level.
The editorial also points to research showing that Americans want to change the food system, have broad support for government incentives to encourage sustainable farming practices, and express strong concern that one-third of children today will develop type-2 diabetes. The editorial also notes the "wave of consolidation is sweeping through agriculture" that "will have ramifications throughout the food chain," such as the proposed Dow/DuPoint merger.
"What will it take to get politicians to talk about butter as much as about guns?" the editorial asks.
One organization that agrees that food should be a major issue for presidential leadership is the Union of Concerned Scientists.
They, along with Food Policy Action and the HEAL Food Alliance, launched the Plate of the Union Initiative to urge political leaders to talk about reforming the food system.
"Plate of the Union is the first coordinated campaign effort to get candidates running for President talking about our broken food system," Tom Colicchio, co-founder of Food Policy Action, said in October 2015.
"The truth is, our current food system is out of balance," he added. "It prioritizes corporate profits at the expense of our health, the environment and working families. The next President needs to take bold steps to reform our food system to ensure all Americans have equal access to healthy, affordable food."
As Ricardo Salvador, director of the UCS's Food and Environment Program, sees it, "the system as currently practiced, promoted and subsidized exploits both people and nature."
But what we need to do is clear as well, he writes: produce food that makes us healthy, produce it in a way that is safe and sustainable, and recognize that "healthy food is a necessity not a privilege."
And "There is political tailwind to support the first presidential candidate to realize that by fixing food many other high priority issues can also be fixed," he writes.
In a blog post this weekend, Salvador adds:
We should rework our nation's food and agriculture policy system to emphasize the goals of improved public health, an enhanced environment, and renewed rural economies. These are the things all Americans can agree are worth the investment of our public dollars. Policies that return midsize farms to the land and connect them with markets will move us closer to those goals. In this political season, presidential candidates should seize the opportunity to improve the nation's food and farm system for the benefit of us all, and to give Iowans (and all of us) actual lasting solutions.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"Why don't candidates talk about food?"
That's a question asked by the Des Moines Register's editorial board this weekend, who also pointed out that the "first-in-the nation caucuses are held in one of the world's great agricultural centers."
It should be a major issue for presidential candidates, the Register says, because
What we eat and how it's produced are not jokes. These questions involve many of the nation's major issues -- including health care costs and quality, the federal debt, pollution, jobs and immigration -- and they require leadership on the presidential level.
The editorial also points to research showing that Americans want to change the food system, have broad support for government incentives to encourage sustainable farming practices, and express strong concern that one-third of children today will develop type-2 diabetes. The editorial also notes the "wave of consolidation is sweeping through agriculture" that "will have ramifications throughout the food chain," such as the proposed Dow/DuPoint merger.
"What will it take to get politicians to talk about butter as much as about guns?" the editorial asks.
One organization that agrees that food should be a major issue for presidential leadership is the Union of Concerned Scientists.
They, along with Food Policy Action and the HEAL Food Alliance, launched the Plate of the Union Initiative to urge political leaders to talk about reforming the food system.
"Plate of the Union is the first coordinated campaign effort to get candidates running for President talking about our broken food system," Tom Colicchio, co-founder of Food Policy Action, said in October 2015.
"The truth is, our current food system is out of balance," he added. "It prioritizes corporate profits at the expense of our health, the environment and working families. The next President needs to take bold steps to reform our food system to ensure all Americans have equal access to healthy, affordable food."
As Ricardo Salvador, director of the UCS's Food and Environment Program, sees it, "the system as currently practiced, promoted and subsidized exploits both people and nature."
But what we need to do is clear as well, he writes: produce food that makes us healthy, produce it in a way that is safe and sustainable, and recognize that "healthy food is a necessity not a privilege."
And "There is political tailwind to support the first presidential candidate to realize that by fixing food many other high priority issues can also be fixed," he writes.
In a blog post this weekend, Salvador adds:
We should rework our nation's food and agriculture policy system to emphasize the goals of improved public health, an enhanced environment, and renewed rural economies. These are the things all Americans can agree are worth the investment of our public dollars. Policies that return midsize farms to the land and connect them with markets will move us closer to those goals. In this political season, presidential candidates should seize the opportunity to improve the nation's food and farm system for the benefit of us all, and to give Iowans (and all of us) actual lasting solutions.
"Why don't candidates talk about food?"
That's a question asked by the Des Moines Register's editorial board this weekend, who also pointed out that the "first-in-the nation caucuses are held in one of the world's great agricultural centers."
It should be a major issue for presidential candidates, the Register says, because
What we eat and how it's produced are not jokes. These questions involve many of the nation's major issues -- including health care costs and quality, the federal debt, pollution, jobs and immigration -- and they require leadership on the presidential level.
The editorial also points to research showing that Americans want to change the food system, have broad support for government incentives to encourage sustainable farming practices, and express strong concern that one-third of children today will develop type-2 diabetes. The editorial also notes the "wave of consolidation is sweeping through agriculture" that "will have ramifications throughout the food chain," such as the proposed Dow/DuPoint merger.
"What will it take to get politicians to talk about butter as much as about guns?" the editorial asks.
One organization that agrees that food should be a major issue for presidential leadership is the Union of Concerned Scientists.
They, along with Food Policy Action and the HEAL Food Alliance, launched the Plate of the Union Initiative to urge political leaders to talk about reforming the food system.
"Plate of the Union is the first coordinated campaign effort to get candidates running for President talking about our broken food system," Tom Colicchio, co-founder of Food Policy Action, said in October 2015.
"The truth is, our current food system is out of balance," he added. "It prioritizes corporate profits at the expense of our health, the environment and working families. The next President needs to take bold steps to reform our food system to ensure all Americans have equal access to healthy, affordable food."
As Ricardo Salvador, director of the UCS's Food and Environment Program, sees it, "the system as currently practiced, promoted and subsidized exploits both people and nature."
But what we need to do is clear as well, he writes: produce food that makes us healthy, produce it in a way that is safe and sustainable, and recognize that "healthy food is a necessity not a privilege."
And "There is political tailwind to support the first presidential candidate to realize that by fixing food many other high priority issues can also be fixed," he writes.
In a blog post this weekend, Salvador adds:
We should rework our nation's food and agriculture policy system to emphasize the goals of improved public health, an enhanced environment, and renewed rural economies. These are the things all Americans can agree are worth the investment of our public dollars. Policies that return midsize farms to the land and connect them with markets will move us closer to those goals. In this political season, presidential candidates should seize the opportunity to improve the nation's food and farm system for the benefit of us all, and to give Iowans (and all of us) actual lasting solutions.