SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Lifted by Bold Stances on Economy and Healthcare, Sanders Takes Solid Iowa Lead
With nations first caucus less than two weeks away, poll shows Sanders making gains for strong proposals like Medicare for All and holding Wall Street accountable
Jan 21, 2016
Just two days after a poll showed Bernie Sanders 'trouncing' the national frontrunner Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, a new survey of Iowa voters released late Thursday afternoon shows Sanders with a "solid" 8-point lead over his rival in the early caucus state.
According to the new CNN/ORC poll, Sanders is leading Clinton in Iowa 51% to 43% among likely Democratic presidential caucus-goers. The poll noted its margin of error at +/- 6.1 percent.
Conducted from Jan. 15 to Jan. 20, the poll is most significant for showing the dramatic swing which has occurred since the same survey was conducted at the beginning of December. At that time, Clinton was ahead by more than 20 points (54% to 36%).
There was also a big swing regarding who voters trusted most on specific issues. With a prominent disagreement over the need for healthcare reform surfacing this week in which Sanders defended his proposal to create a Medicare for All program from attacks by the Clinton campaign, one twitter user pointed out how Iowa voters now trust Sanders much more on dealing with the nation's healthcare challenges:
Additionally, the poll found that Iowans now trust Sanders over Clinton on the economy by 22 points (58% to 36%). Meanwhile, 67 percent of those surveyed said they thought Sander's policies would help the middle class, while only 30 perecent felt the same about Clinton.
The other key metric which showed a dramatic reversal was the way in which individuals think Sanders does a better job of representing their own personal values as Democrats. Though Clinton held a 46% to 44% lead in that category in December, Sanders has now blown past her -- with 57 percent surveyed saying he more closely represents their views, compared to just 38 percent for Clinton.
While the Clinton campaign questioned the accuracy of the CNN/ORC poll and downplayed their significance, Sanders campaign spokesperson Michael Briggs said it should be seen as further evidence to explain the increased attacks aimed at his candidate by Clinton's camp.
"At a time when Sec. Clinton's lead is evaporating in Iowa we understand why her campaign is panicking and saying absurd things," Briggs said in a statement. "The people of Iowa showed extraordinary courage in 2008 by voting for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, and many Iowans now understand that it's too late for her brand of establishment politics and establishment economics."
As progressive advocate Jim Hightower observed in his column on Thursday, "something is happening" in the country when it comes to the Sanders' presidential run. Hightower describes the campaign as "a spontaneous, unusually vibrant grassroots uprising that has already shattered the Democratic Establishment's holy myth that corporate centrism and super PAC money are the only means to victory."
That said, and even as her lead slips in state after state and across the country, Clinton remains the national frontrunner. Even among those Iowa voters in Thursday's CNN/ORC poll, Clinton was still seen as the Democratic candidate most likely to win the general election in November.
So can Sanders actually win? That remains the outstanding question, but is one that more and more people are asking with increasingly serious faces.
As Bob Burnett said in his Common Dreams op-ed on the subject today, "I'm beginning to believe."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Just two days after a poll showed Bernie Sanders 'trouncing' the national frontrunner Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, a new survey of Iowa voters released late Thursday afternoon shows Sanders with a "solid" 8-point lead over his rival in the early caucus state.
According to the new CNN/ORC poll, Sanders is leading Clinton in Iowa 51% to 43% among likely Democratic presidential caucus-goers. The poll noted its margin of error at +/- 6.1 percent.
Conducted from Jan. 15 to Jan. 20, the poll is most significant for showing the dramatic swing which has occurred since the same survey was conducted at the beginning of December. At that time, Clinton was ahead by more than 20 points (54% to 36%).
There was also a big swing regarding who voters trusted most on specific issues. With a prominent disagreement over the need for healthcare reform surfacing this week in which Sanders defended his proposal to create a Medicare for All program from attacks by the Clinton campaign, one twitter user pointed out how Iowa voters now trust Sanders much more on dealing with the nation's healthcare challenges:
Additionally, the poll found that Iowans now trust Sanders over Clinton on the economy by 22 points (58% to 36%). Meanwhile, 67 percent of those surveyed said they thought Sander's policies would help the middle class, while only 30 perecent felt the same about Clinton.
The other key metric which showed a dramatic reversal was the way in which individuals think Sanders does a better job of representing their own personal values as Democrats. Though Clinton held a 46% to 44% lead in that category in December, Sanders has now blown past her -- with 57 percent surveyed saying he more closely represents their views, compared to just 38 percent for Clinton.
While the Clinton campaign questioned the accuracy of the CNN/ORC poll and downplayed their significance, Sanders campaign spokesperson Michael Briggs said it should be seen as further evidence to explain the increased attacks aimed at his candidate by Clinton's camp.
"At a time when Sec. Clinton's lead is evaporating in Iowa we understand why her campaign is panicking and saying absurd things," Briggs said in a statement. "The people of Iowa showed extraordinary courage in 2008 by voting for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, and many Iowans now understand that it's too late for her brand of establishment politics and establishment economics."
As progressive advocate Jim Hightower observed in his column on Thursday, "something is happening" in the country when it comes to the Sanders' presidential run. Hightower describes the campaign as "a spontaneous, unusually vibrant grassroots uprising that has already shattered the Democratic Establishment's holy myth that corporate centrism and super PAC money are the only means to victory."
That said, and even as her lead slips in state after state and across the country, Clinton remains the national frontrunner. Even among those Iowa voters in Thursday's CNN/ORC poll, Clinton was still seen as the Democratic candidate most likely to win the general election in November.
So can Sanders actually win? That remains the outstanding question, but is one that more and more people are asking with increasingly serious faces.
As Bob Burnett said in his Common Dreams op-ed on the subject today, "I'm beginning to believe."
Just two days after a poll showed Bernie Sanders 'trouncing' the national frontrunner Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, a new survey of Iowa voters released late Thursday afternoon shows Sanders with a "solid" 8-point lead over his rival in the early caucus state.
According to the new CNN/ORC poll, Sanders is leading Clinton in Iowa 51% to 43% among likely Democratic presidential caucus-goers. The poll noted its margin of error at +/- 6.1 percent.
Conducted from Jan. 15 to Jan. 20, the poll is most significant for showing the dramatic swing which has occurred since the same survey was conducted at the beginning of December. At that time, Clinton was ahead by more than 20 points (54% to 36%).
There was also a big swing regarding who voters trusted most on specific issues. With a prominent disagreement over the need for healthcare reform surfacing this week in which Sanders defended his proposal to create a Medicare for All program from attacks by the Clinton campaign, one twitter user pointed out how Iowa voters now trust Sanders much more on dealing with the nation's healthcare challenges:
Additionally, the poll found that Iowans now trust Sanders over Clinton on the economy by 22 points (58% to 36%). Meanwhile, 67 percent of those surveyed said they thought Sander's policies would help the middle class, while only 30 perecent felt the same about Clinton.
The other key metric which showed a dramatic reversal was the way in which individuals think Sanders does a better job of representing their own personal values as Democrats. Though Clinton held a 46% to 44% lead in that category in December, Sanders has now blown past her -- with 57 percent surveyed saying he more closely represents their views, compared to just 38 percent for Clinton.
While the Clinton campaign questioned the accuracy of the CNN/ORC poll and downplayed their significance, Sanders campaign spokesperson Michael Briggs said it should be seen as further evidence to explain the increased attacks aimed at his candidate by Clinton's camp.
"At a time when Sec. Clinton's lead is evaporating in Iowa we understand why her campaign is panicking and saying absurd things," Briggs said in a statement. "The people of Iowa showed extraordinary courage in 2008 by voting for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, and many Iowans now understand that it's too late for her brand of establishment politics and establishment economics."
As progressive advocate Jim Hightower observed in his column on Thursday, "something is happening" in the country when it comes to the Sanders' presidential run. Hightower describes the campaign as "a spontaneous, unusually vibrant grassroots uprising that has already shattered the Democratic Establishment's holy myth that corporate centrism and super PAC money are the only means to victory."
That said, and even as her lead slips in state after state and across the country, Clinton remains the national frontrunner. Even among those Iowa voters in Thursday's CNN/ORC poll, Clinton was still seen as the Democratic candidate most likely to win the general election in November.
So can Sanders actually win? That remains the outstanding question, but is one that more and more people are asking with increasingly serious faces.
As Bob Burnett said in his Common Dreams op-ed on the subject today, "I'm beginning to believe."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.