SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
MSF: Forcible US Intrusion Into Hospital May Have Destroyed War Crimes Evidence
"Their unannounced and forced entry damaged property, destroyed potential evidence and caused stress and fear for the MSF team," says medical charity.
Oct 16, 2015
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that the U.S. military's forcible intrusion into its hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan on Thursday potentially destroyed evidence of its war crime and underscores the need for a truly independent investigation into the U.S. bombing that killed 22 people.
"[MSF] confirms that an armored vehicle forced its way through the closed main gate of our hospital in Kunduz yesterday, Oct. 15, at 1:30 p.m. local time," the organization said Friday. "Their unannounced and forced entry damaged the gate to the property, destroying potential evidence in the process and causing stress and fear for the MSF team."
"An MSF team had arrived earlier in the day to visit the hospital. Only after the armored vehicle forced its way into our compound was MSF informed that this intrusion was in fact a delegation from the U.S./NATO/Afghan investigation team," the group continued. "This happened despite an agreement made between MSF and the joint investigation team that MSF would be given notice before each step of the procedure involving the organization's personnel and assets."
The U.S. bombing of the MSF hospital on October 3 killed 10 patients,12 staff members, and wounded 37 people. The Pentagon acknowledged earlier this month that its Special Forces were responsible for the deadly attack, but only after changing the official story at least four times, including initial denials of culpability and claims of justification.
Citing an unnamed former intelligence official, the Associated Press reported Thursday that "special operations analysts were gathering intelligence on an Afghan hospital days before it was destroyed by a U.S. military attack because they believed it was being used by a Pakistani operative to coordinate Taliban activity."
The newly-revealed details could indicate "that the hospital was intentionally targeted," Meinie Nicolai, president of the operational directorate of MSF, told AP. "This would amount to a premeditated massacre."
Nicolai added that MSF staff "reported a calm night and that there were no armed combatants, nor active fighting in or from the compound prior to the airstrikes."
Some have expressed skepticism of the AP report, penned by journalist Ken Dilanian, due to the article's reliance on an anonymous source to spread allegations that the hospital was being used by the Taliban or its associates.
The medical charity has repeatedly declared that the bombing of the hospital--a protected space under humanitarian law--amounts to a war crime and only an independent probe can be trusted to reveal the truth about the attack. While the U.S., NATO, and Afghan authorities have launched their own investigations, MSF argues "it is impossible to expect parties involved in the conflict to carry out independent and impartial investigations of military actions in which they are themselves implicated."
On Thursday, MSF launched a petition "to call on President Obama and the United States to consent to an independent investigation." MSF press officer Tim Shenk told Common Dreams that the initiative garnered 50,000 signatures in the first 24 hours.
While U.S. President Barack Obama formally apologized to MSF for the deadly attack, the U.S. government has yet to consent to an impartial, international investigation.
Obama did, however, announce Thursday that he is defying earlier pledges and extending the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan--which entered its 15th year last week--by leaving up to 5,500 soldiers in the country until at least 2017.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that the U.S. military's forcible intrusion into its hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan on Thursday potentially destroyed evidence of its war crime and underscores the need for a truly independent investigation into the U.S. bombing that killed 22 people.
"[MSF] confirms that an armored vehicle forced its way through the closed main gate of our hospital in Kunduz yesterday, Oct. 15, at 1:30 p.m. local time," the organization said Friday. "Their unannounced and forced entry damaged the gate to the property, destroying potential evidence in the process and causing stress and fear for the MSF team."
"An MSF team had arrived earlier in the day to visit the hospital. Only after the armored vehicle forced its way into our compound was MSF informed that this intrusion was in fact a delegation from the U.S./NATO/Afghan investigation team," the group continued. "This happened despite an agreement made between MSF and the joint investigation team that MSF would be given notice before each step of the procedure involving the organization's personnel and assets."
The U.S. bombing of the MSF hospital on October 3 killed 10 patients,12 staff members, and wounded 37 people. The Pentagon acknowledged earlier this month that its Special Forces were responsible for the deadly attack, but only after changing the official story at least four times, including initial denials of culpability and claims of justification.
Citing an unnamed former intelligence official, the Associated Press reported Thursday that "special operations analysts were gathering intelligence on an Afghan hospital days before it was destroyed by a U.S. military attack because they believed it was being used by a Pakistani operative to coordinate Taliban activity."
The newly-revealed details could indicate "that the hospital was intentionally targeted," Meinie Nicolai, president of the operational directorate of MSF, told AP. "This would amount to a premeditated massacre."
Nicolai added that MSF staff "reported a calm night and that there were no armed combatants, nor active fighting in or from the compound prior to the airstrikes."
Some have expressed skepticism of the AP report, penned by journalist Ken Dilanian, due to the article's reliance on an anonymous source to spread allegations that the hospital was being used by the Taliban or its associates.
The medical charity has repeatedly declared that the bombing of the hospital--a protected space under humanitarian law--amounts to a war crime and only an independent probe can be trusted to reveal the truth about the attack. While the U.S., NATO, and Afghan authorities have launched their own investigations, MSF argues "it is impossible to expect parties involved in the conflict to carry out independent and impartial investigations of military actions in which they are themselves implicated."
On Thursday, MSF launched a petition "to call on President Obama and the United States to consent to an independent investigation." MSF press officer Tim Shenk told Common Dreams that the initiative garnered 50,000 signatures in the first 24 hours.
While U.S. President Barack Obama formally apologized to MSF for the deadly attack, the U.S. government has yet to consent to an impartial, international investigation.
Obama did, however, announce Thursday that he is defying earlier pledges and extending the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan--which entered its 15th year last week--by leaving up to 5,500 soldiers in the country until at least 2017.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that the U.S. military's forcible intrusion into its hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan on Thursday potentially destroyed evidence of its war crime and underscores the need for a truly independent investigation into the U.S. bombing that killed 22 people.
"[MSF] confirms that an armored vehicle forced its way through the closed main gate of our hospital in Kunduz yesterday, Oct. 15, at 1:30 p.m. local time," the organization said Friday. "Their unannounced and forced entry damaged the gate to the property, destroying potential evidence in the process and causing stress and fear for the MSF team."
"An MSF team had arrived earlier in the day to visit the hospital. Only after the armored vehicle forced its way into our compound was MSF informed that this intrusion was in fact a delegation from the U.S./NATO/Afghan investigation team," the group continued. "This happened despite an agreement made between MSF and the joint investigation team that MSF would be given notice before each step of the procedure involving the organization's personnel and assets."
The U.S. bombing of the MSF hospital on October 3 killed 10 patients,12 staff members, and wounded 37 people. The Pentagon acknowledged earlier this month that its Special Forces were responsible for the deadly attack, but only after changing the official story at least four times, including initial denials of culpability and claims of justification.
Citing an unnamed former intelligence official, the Associated Press reported Thursday that "special operations analysts were gathering intelligence on an Afghan hospital days before it was destroyed by a U.S. military attack because they believed it was being used by a Pakistani operative to coordinate Taliban activity."
The newly-revealed details could indicate "that the hospital was intentionally targeted," Meinie Nicolai, president of the operational directorate of MSF, told AP. "This would amount to a premeditated massacre."
Nicolai added that MSF staff "reported a calm night and that there were no armed combatants, nor active fighting in or from the compound prior to the airstrikes."
Some have expressed skepticism of the AP report, penned by journalist Ken Dilanian, due to the article's reliance on an anonymous source to spread allegations that the hospital was being used by the Taliban or its associates.
The medical charity has repeatedly declared that the bombing of the hospital--a protected space under humanitarian law--amounts to a war crime and only an independent probe can be trusted to reveal the truth about the attack. While the U.S., NATO, and Afghan authorities have launched their own investigations, MSF argues "it is impossible to expect parties involved in the conflict to carry out independent and impartial investigations of military actions in which they are themselves implicated."
On Thursday, MSF launched a petition "to call on President Obama and the United States to consent to an independent investigation." MSF press officer Tim Shenk told Common Dreams that the initiative garnered 50,000 signatures in the first 24 hours.
While U.S. President Barack Obama formally apologized to MSF for the deadly attack, the U.S. government has yet to consent to an impartial, international investigation.
Obama did, however, announce Thursday that he is defying earlier pledges and extending the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan--which entered its 15th year last week--by leaving up to 5,500 soldiers in the country until at least 2017.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.