SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Apple Privacy Push Faces First Big Test From US Government
With tech companies stepping up privacy protections for users, law enforcement looks for new ways to access data
Sep 08, 2015
In the latest development in the battle for privacy rights, Apple has rejected a court order to hand over to the U.S. Department of Justice a series of text messages sent between two iPhones, citing encryption safeguards that prevent the company from accessing communications data.
The DOJ says it needs to see the text messages for a criminal investigation--but Apple responded that its new operating system prevents the tech company from accessing data on phones with PINs or passwords, even for law enforcement agencies. The dispute highlights a new frontier in the electronic privacy debate that sparked after Apple introduced its more consumer-friendly iOS last year.
While the DOJ has not yet responded to Apple's inability to comply with the court order, observers have pointed out the parallels with the DOJ's other ongoing tussle with a tech giant--Microsoft.
The New York Times reports:
The [Microsoft] case, which goes before a federal appeals court in New York on Wednesday and is being closely watched by industry officials and civil liberties advocates, began when the company refused to comply with a warrant in December 2013 for emails from a drug trafficking suspect. Microsoft said federal officials would have to get an order from an Irish court, because the emails were stored on servers in Dublin.
In the wake of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's 2013 domestic surveillance revelations, the call for increased consumer protections against government spying has been met with outspoken rhetoric from intelligence agencies which insist that access to communications data is vital for national security.
FBI director James Comey in October warned that adding encryption protections to cell phones and other devices would leave law enforcement "in the dark" in counter-terrorism operations and hunting down child molesters. Agents in "law enforcement, national security, and public safety are looking for security that enhances liberty," he said during a speech at the Brookings Institution.
But that hasn't convinced Apple or other tech companies, such as Google, that have stepped up privacy protections for users. And it rings hollow for civil liberties advocates, who maintain that encryption tools do not hinder police and FBI operations.
Apple has previously argued that the type of access being pursued by the government could leave users open to hackers and other privacy exploitation, although the company has also privately expressed interest in finding a compromise with the DOJ, according to the Times.
It is unlikely that the DOJ will take Apple to court the same way it did Microsoft, experts say. But the dynamics between the two sides may be setting up an unprecedented outcome.
As Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith explained in a recent interview, "Clearly, if the U.S. government wins, the door is open for other governments to reach into data centers in the U.S."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In the latest development in the battle for privacy rights, Apple has rejected a court order to hand over to the U.S. Department of Justice a series of text messages sent between two iPhones, citing encryption safeguards that prevent the company from accessing communications data.
The DOJ says it needs to see the text messages for a criminal investigation--but Apple responded that its new operating system prevents the tech company from accessing data on phones with PINs or passwords, even for law enforcement agencies. The dispute highlights a new frontier in the electronic privacy debate that sparked after Apple introduced its more consumer-friendly iOS last year.
While the DOJ has not yet responded to Apple's inability to comply with the court order, observers have pointed out the parallels with the DOJ's other ongoing tussle with a tech giant--Microsoft.
The New York Times reports:
The [Microsoft] case, which goes before a federal appeals court in New York on Wednesday and is being closely watched by industry officials and civil liberties advocates, began when the company refused to comply with a warrant in December 2013 for emails from a drug trafficking suspect. Microsoft said federal officials would have to get an order from an Irish court, because the emails were stored on servers in Dublin.
In the wake of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's 2013 domestic surveillance revelations, the call for increased consumer protections against government spying has been met with outspoken rhetoric from intelligence agencies which insist that access to communications data is vital for national security.
FBI director James Comey in October warned that adding encryption protections to cell phones and other devices would leave law enforcement "in the dark" in counter-terrorism operations and hunting down child molesters. Agents in "law enforcement, national security, and public safety are looking for security that enhances liberty," he said during a speech at the Brookings Institution.
But that hasn't convinced Apple or other tech companies, such as Google, that have stepped up privacy protections for users. And it rings hollow for civil liberties advocates, who maintain that encryption tools do not hinder police and FBI operations.
Apple has previously argued that the type of access being pursued by the government could leave users open to hackers and other privacy exploitation, although the company has also privately expressed interest in finding a compromise with the DOJ, according to the Times.
It is unlikely that the DOJ will take Apple to court the same way it did Microsoft, experts say. But the dynamics between the two sides may be setting up an unprecedented outcome.
As Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith explained in a recent interview, "Clearly, if the U.S. government wins, the door is open for other governments to reach into data centers in the U.S."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In the latest development in the battle for privacy rights, Apple has rejected a court order to hand over to the U.S. Department of Justice a series of text messages sent between two iPhones, citing encryption safeguards that prevent the company from accessing communications data.
The DOJ says it needs to see the text messages for a criminal investigation--but Apple responded that its new operating system prevents the tech company from accessing data on phones with PINs or passwords, even for law enforcement agencies. The dispute highlights a new frontier in the electronic privacy debate that sparked after Apple introduced its more consumer-friendly iOS last year.
While the DOJ has not yet responded to Apple's inability to comply with the court order, observers have pointed out the parallels with the DOJ's other ongoing tussle with a tech giant--Microsoft.
The New York Times reports:
The [Microsoft] case, which goes before a federal appeals court in New York on Wednesday and is being closely watched by industry officials and civil liberties advocates, began when the company refused to comply with a warrant in December 2013 for emails from a drug trafficking suspect. Microsoft said federal officials would have to get an order from an Irish court, because the emails were stored on servers in Dublin.
In the wake of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's 2013 domestic surveillance revelations, the call for increased consumer protections against government spying has been met with outspoken rhetoric from intelligence agencies which insist that access to communications data is vital for national security.
FBI director James Comey in October warned that adding encryption protections to cell phones and other devices would leave law enforcement "in the dark" in counter-terrorism operations and hunting down child molesters. Agents in "law enforcement, national security, and public safety are looking for security that enhances liberty," he said during a speech at the Brookings Institution.
But that hasn't convinced Apple or other tech companies, such as Google, that have stepped up privacy protections for users. And it rings hollow for civil liberties advocates, who maintain that encryption tools do not hinder police and FBI operations.
Apple has previously argued that the type of access being pursued by the government could leave users open to hackers and other privacy exploitation, although the company has also privately expressed interest in finding a compromise with the DOJ, according to the Times.
It is unlikely that the DOJ will take Apple to court the same way it did Microsoft, experts say. But the dynamics between the two sides may be setting up an unprecedented outcome.
As Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith explained in a recent interview, "Clearly, if the U.S. government wins, the door is open for other governments to reach into data centers in the U.S."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.