

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Pesticides that have been banned in Europe over bee safety concerns may pose an even greater risk to pollinators than previously thought, a new report by the European Union's food safety watchdog reveals.
Neonicotinoids, or neonics, pose high risks to bees when sprayed on plant leaves, according to data by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in its report, published Wednesday--which bolsters previous findings that neonics harm pollinators when used as seed treatments or granules.
The EFSA studied three pesticides in particular--clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam--all of which were banned by the EU in 2013 for a two-year period after scientific reports warned of their dangers. The latest findings, said Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero, "confirmed what has already been demonstrated by a wealth of scientific evidence: neonicotinoids are a serious threat to bees and to the future of farming."
"The Commission should expand the EU-wide ban to cover all uses of neonicotinoids on all crops," Contiero said. "Viable non-chemical alternatives exist and the EU should encourage farmers to use them."
Jose Tarazona, head of the EFSA's pesticide unit, told the Guardian on Wednesday it is "clear that in some cases there is data suggesting high toxicity and potential risk from these substances."
Neonic use has been linked to dramatic declines in populations of pollinators like bumblebees and honey bees, as well as insects like moths, ladybirds and hoverflies, which help reduce numbers of crop pests. All bee varieties in Europe have been placed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's red list (pdf) of threatened species.
"Another day and yet another study shows the high risk to bees from neonicotinoid pesticides," said Paul de Zylva, senior nature campaigner at Friends of the Earth (FOE), in response to the EFSA's study.
"The evidence of harm is clear," de Zylva continued. "Questions need to be asked about how these products were ever approved for use when they were not tested for their effects on different types of bees."
Earlier this year, the United Kingdom lifted its own moratorium on pesticides to allow for some limited use of two kinds of neonics--produced by agrochemical giants Bayer and Syngenta--by farmers growing oilseed rape on roughly 300 square kilometers of land. While the repeal is temporary, giving farmers access to the pesticides for only 120 days, the move sparked outrage among environmental advocates.
Wednesday's findings "underlines why neonics are restricted and why we are challenging the Government's decision to allow use of the banned pesticides in England," de Zylva said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Pesticides that have been banned in Europe over bee safety concerns may pose an even greater risk to pollinators than previously thought, a new report by the European Union's food safety watchdog reveals.
Neonicotinoids, or neonics, pose high risks to bees when sprayed on plant leaves, according to data by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in its report, published Wednesday--which bolsters previous findings that neonics harm pollinators when used as seed treatments or granules.
The EFSA studied three pesticides in particular--clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam--all of which were banned by the EU in 2013 for a two-year period after scientific reports warned of their dangers. The latest findings, said Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero, "confirmed what has already been demonstrated by a wealth of scientific evidence: neonicotinoids are a serious threat to bees and to the future of farming."
"The Commission should expand the EU-wide ban to cover all uses of neonicotinoids on all crops," Contiero said. "Viable non-chemical alternatives exist and the EU should encourage farmers to use them."
Jose Tarazona, head of the EFSA's pesticide unit, told the Guardian on Wednesday it is "clear that in some cases there is data suggesting high toxicity and potential risk from these substances."
Neonic use has been linked to dramatic declines in populations of pollinators like bumblebees and honey bees, as well as insects like moths, ladybirds and hoverflies, which help reduce numbers of crop pests. All bee varieties in Europe have been placed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's red list (pdf) of threatened species.
"Another day and yet another study shows the high risk to bees from neonicotinoid pesticides," said Paul de Zylva, senior nature campaigner at Friends of the Earth (FOE), in response to the EFSA's study.
"The evidence of harm is clear," de Zylva continued. "Questions need to be asked about how these products were ever approved for use when they were not tested for their effects on different types of bees."
Earlier this year, the United Kingdom lifted its own moratorium on pesticides to allow for some limited use of two kinds of neonics--produced by agrochemical giants Bayer and Syngenta--by farmers growing oilseed rape on roughly 300 square kilometers of land. While the repeal is temporary, giving farmers access to the pesticides for only 120 days, the move sparked outrage among environmental advocates.
Wednesday's findings "underlines why neonics are restricted and why we are challenging the Government's decision to allow use of the banned pesticides in England," de Zylva said.
Pesticides that have been banned in Europe over bee safety concerns may pose an even greater risk to pollinators than previously thought, a new report by the European Union's food safety watchdog reveals.
Neonicotinoids, or neonics, pose high risks to bees when sprayed on plant leaves, according to data by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in its report, published Wednesday--which bolsters previous findings that neonics harm pollinators when used as seed treatments or granules.
The EFSA studied three pesticides in particular--clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam--all of which were banned by the EU in 2013 for a two-year period after scientific reports warned of their dangers. The latest findings, said Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero, "confirmed what has already been demonstrated by a wealth of scientific evidence: neonicotinoids are a serious threat to bees and to the future of farming."
"The Commission should expand the EU-wide ban to cover all uses of neonicotinoids on all crops," Contiero said. "Viable non-chemical alternatives exist and the EU should encourage farmers to use them."
Jose Tarazona, head of the EFSA's pesticide unit, told the Guardian on Wednesday it is "clear that in some cases there is data suggesting high toxicity and potential risk from these substances."
Neonic use has been linked to dramatic declines in populations of pollinators like bumblebees and honey bees, as well as insects like moths, ladybirds and hoverflies, which help reduce numbers of crop pests. All bee varieties in Europe have been placed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's red list (pdf) of threatened species.
"Another day and yet another study shows the high risk to bees from neonicotinoid pesticides," said Paul de Zylva, senior nature campaigner at Friends of the Earth (FOE), in response to the EFSA's study.
"The evidence of harm is clear," de Zylva continued. "Questions need to be asked about how these products were ever approved for use when they were not tested for their effects on different types of bees."
Earlier this year, the United Kingdom lifted its own moratorium on pesticides to allow for some limited use of two kinds of neonics--produced by agrochemical giants Bayer and Syngenta--by farmers growing oilseed rape on roughly 300 square kilometers of land. While the repeal is temporary, giving farmers access to the pesticides for only 120 days, the move sparked outrage among environmental advocates.
Wednesday's findings "underlines why neonics are restricted and why we are challenging the Government's decision to allow use of the banned pesticides in England," de Zylva said.