SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Old and Broke in America? It Doesn't Have To Be This Way, Says Sanders
'At a time when half of all older workers have no retirement savings,' argues presidential candidate, 'we need to expand, not cut, Social Security benefits so that every American can retire with dignity.'
Jun 03, 2015
Are the baby boomers going bust?
A new report by the Government Accountability Office released Tuesday shows that the savings and overall financial stability of Americans older than 55 has dropped dramatically in recent decades, leaving a worrisome situation as the ranks of the elderly are set to increase even more in the years ahead.
" Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history. At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders According to the report, more than half of this age group have no retirement savings whatsoever and most of these also have no pension (sometimes referred to has a defined benefit (DB) plan) or other spare savings to rely on once they stop working. The GAO says that Social Security currently provides most of the income for about half of households age 65 and older.
But with Social Security payments not keeping pace with the cost of living, experts worry that without finding ways to increase Social Security's reach the current crisis could turn into a full-blown disaster.
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
As the Huffington Post notes, "In 1975, most workers with employer-sponsored retirement plans had pensions that provided a lifetime 'defined benefit.' As of 2012, such plans had 40 million participants, while 91 million workers had retirement savings plans such as 401(k)s, which are based on workers' own contributions and offer no guarantee of lifetime income."
The GAO study was requested by Sen. Sanders, now a presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, who earlier this year was the lead sponsor of legislation designed to increase Social Security benefits for recipients.
"This report makes it clear that there is a retirement crisis in America today," Sanders said in response to the GAO findings. "At a time when half of all older workers have no retirement savings, we need to expand, not cut, Social Security benefits so that every American can retire with dignity."
While Republicans and many austerity-friendly Democrats have openly discussed making cuts to Social Security, Sanders has been among those lawmakers who joined progressive-minded economists and social justice advocates to instead demand that Social Security be bolstered by increasing the cap on what high income earners pay into the program's trust fund. Currently that cap is set at just $110,000 which means that people who earn more than that pay a much lower share of their income into the fund annually.
According to Sanders' office, the Social Security Expansion Act he put forth "would make the wealthiest Americans pay the same share of their income into the retirement program as other wage earners." That change, Sanders argues, would extend the solvency of Social Security through 2065 while allowing monthly payments to Social Security recipients go up. Under his proposal, Sanders says the average benefit would increase by $65 a month, cost-of-living adjustments would more accurately measure inflation, and an increase to the minimum benefit could lift millions of vulnerable seniors out of poverty in their final years.
"Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history," Sanders said. "At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Are the baby boomers going bust?
A new report by the Government Accountability Office released Tuesday shows that the savings and overall financial stability of Americans older than 55 has dropped dramatically in recent decades, leaving a worrisome situation as the ranks of the elderly are set to increase even more in the years ahead.
" Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history. At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders According to the report, more than half of this age group have no retirement savings whatsoever and most of these also have no pension (sometimes referred to has a defined benefit (DB) plan) or other spare savings to rely on once they stop working. The GAO says that Social Security currently provides most of the income for about half of households age 65 and older.
But with Social Security payments not keeping pace with the cost of living, experts worry that without finding ways to increase Social Security's reach the current crisis could turn into a full-blown disaster.
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
As the Huffington Post notes, "In 1975, most workers with employer-sponsored retirement plans had pensions that provided a lifetime 'defined benefit.' As of 2012, such plans had 40 million participants, while 91 million workers had retirement savings plans such as 401(k)s, which are based on workers' own contributions and offer no guarantee of lifetime income."
The GAO study was requested by Sen. Sanders, now a presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, who earlier this year was the lead sponsor of legislation designed to increase Social Security benefits for recipients.
"This report makes it clear that there is a retirement crisis in America today," Sanders said in response to the GAO findings. "At a time when half of all older workers have no retirement savings, we need to expand, not cut, Social Security benefits so that every American can retire with dignity."
While Republicans and many austerity-friendly Democrats have openly discussed making cuts to Social Security, Sanders has been among those lawmakers who joined progressive-minded economists and social justice advocates to instead demand that Social Security be bolstered by increasing the cap on what high income earners pay into the program's trust fund. Currently that cap is set at just $110,000 which means that people who earn more than that pay a much lower share of their income into the fund annually.
According to Sanders' office, the Social Security Expansion Act he put forth "would make the wealthiest Americans pay the same share of their income into the retirement program as other wage earners." That change, Sanders argues, would extend the solvency of Social Security through 2065 while allowing monthly payments to Social Security recipients go up. Under his proposal, Sanders says the average benefit would increase by $65 a month, cost-of-living adjustments would more accurately measure inflation, and an increase to the minimum benefit could lift millions of vulnerable seniors out of poverty in their final years.
"Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history," Sanders said. "At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
Are the baby boomers going bust?
A new report by the Government Accountability Office released Tuesday shows that the savings and overall financial stability of Americans older than 55 has dropped dramatically in recent decades, leaving a worrisome situation as the ranks of the elderly are set to increase even more in the years ahead.
" Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history. At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders According to the report, more than half of this age group have no retirement savings whatsoever and most of these also have no pension (sometimes referred to has a defined benefit (DB) plan) or other spare savings to rely on once they stop working. The GAO says that Social Security currently provides most of the income for about half of households age 65 and older.
But with Social Security payments not keeping pace with the cost of living, experts worry that without finding ways to increase Social Security's reach the current crisis could turn into a full-blown disaster.
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
As the Huffington Post notes, "In 1975, most workers with employer-sponsored retirement plans had pensions that provided a lifetime 'defined benefit.' As of 2012, such plans had 40 million participants, while 91 million workers had retirement savings plans such as 401(k)s, which are based on workers' own contributions and offer no guarantee of lifetime income."
The GAO study was requested by Sen. Sanders, now a presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, who earlier this year was the lead sponsor of legislation designed to increase Social Security benefits for recipients.
"This report makes it clear that there is a retirement crisis in America today," Sanders said in response to the GAO findings. "At a time when half of all older workers have no retirement savings, we need to expand, not cut, Social Security benefits so that every American can retire with dignity."
While Republicans and many austerity-friendly Democrats have openly discussed making cuts to Social Security, Sanders has been among those lawmakers who joined progressive-minded economists and social justice advocates to instead demand that Social Security be bolstered by increasing the cap on what high income earners pay into the program's trust fund. Currently that cap is set at just $110,000 which means that people who earn more than that pay a much lower share of their income into the fund annually.
According to Sanders' office, the Social Security Expansion Act he put forth "would make the wealthiest Americans pay the same share of their income into the retirement program as other wage earners." That change, Sanders argues, would extend the solvency of Social Security through 2065 while allowing monthly payments to Social Security recipients go up. Under his proposal, Sanders says the average benefit would increase by $65 a month, cost-of-living adjustments would more accurately measure inflation, and an increase to the minimum benefit could lift millions of vulnerable seniors out of poverty in their final years.
"Social Security is the most successful program in our nation's history," Sanders said. "At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we have got to demand that the richest people in this country pay their fair share."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.