SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Iranian Official Slams Global Powers for Hypocrisy on Nuclear Arsenals
Iran's deputy ambassador to the United Nations criticized the US, China, France, Russia, and the UK for breaking their commitments in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Apr 09, 2015
A top Iranian official on Wednesday slammed world powers for failing to meet their own promises to eliminate their nuclear arsenals and contribute to global non-proliferation.
Gholam Hossein Dehghani, Iran's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, made the statements in an address to the UN's Disarmament Commission.
Dehgani criticized nuclear weapons states for falling far short on commitments they made in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), first implemented more than four decades ago.
Dehgani's statements specifically targeted China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States--the five nuclear weapons states that have signed the NPT. Israel, India, Pakistan and also known atomic weapons states, and according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, North Korea possesses nuclear weapons as well.
There is no known evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program or intends to create one.
"The NPT, which was the foundation of the nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation regime, had succeeded in constraining the spread of nuclear weapons because non-nuclear-weapon States had kept their end of the bargain," said Dehgani, according to the UN's summary of his statements.
"The prospect for establishing a zone free of those weapons in the Middle East would be enhanced when certain nuclear-weapon States abandoned their unconstructive policy of exempting Israel from the NPT," Dehgani continued.
A report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute released last year found that "all the nuclear-armed states are modernizing their remaining nuclear forces and appear determined to retain sizeable nuclear arsenals for the foreseeable future."
The administration of President Barack Obama is currently proposing a $348 billion dollar plan to "rebuild the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal, including the warheads, and the missiles, planes and submarines that carry them," wrote Stephen Young, senior analyst at Union of Concerned Scientists, in an article published last month.
Dehgani's statements came days after a framework nuclear agreement was reached between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
"The deeper problem with the P5+1 agreement with Iran is not the controversy it has generated among the bomb-Iran contingent but the unacknowledged hypocrisy of the P5 nations -- the U.S., Russia, China, Great Britain and France -- which, of course, are all nuclear powers themselves," wrote Chicago-based journalist Robert Koehler in an article published Thursday in Common Dreams.
Koehler continued, "They have made no real effort to pursue global nuclear disarmament by getting rid of their own arsenals, as they agreed to do when they signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which went into effect in 1970."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A top Iranian official on Wednesday slammed world powers for failing to meet their own promises to eliminate their nuclear arsenals and contribute to global non-proliferation.
Gholam Hossein Dehghani, Iran's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, made the statements in an address to the UN's Disarmament Commission.
Dehgani criticized nuclear weapons states for falling far short on commitments they made in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), first implemented more than four decades ago.
Dehgani's statements specifically targeted China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States--the five nuclear weapons states that have signed the NPT. Israel, India, Pakistan and also known atomic weapons states, and according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, North Korea possesses nuclear weapons as well.
There is no known evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program or intends to create one.
"The NPT, which was the foundation of the nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation regime, had succeeded in constraining the spread of nuclear weapons because non-nuclear-weapon States had kept their end of the bargain," said Dehgani, according to the UN's summary of his statements.
"The prospect for establishing a zone free of those weapons in the Middle East would be enhanced when certain nuclear-weapon States abandoned their unconstructive policy of exempting Israel from the NPT," Dehgani continued.
A report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute released last year found that "all the nuclear-armed states are modernizing their remaining nuclear forces and appear determined to retain sizeable nuclear arsenals for the foreseeable future."
The administration of President Barack Obama is currently proposing a $348 billion dollar plan to "rebuild the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal, including the warheads, and the missiles, planes and submarines that carry them," wrote Stephen Young, senior analyst at Union of Concerned Scientists, in an article published last month.
Dehgani's statements came days after a framework nuclear agreement was reached between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
"The deeper problem with the P5+1 agreement with Iran is not the controversy it has generated among the bomb-Iran contingent but the unacknowledged hypocrisy of the P5 nations -- the U.S., Russia, China, Great Britain and France -- which, of course, are all nuclear powers themselves," wrote Chicago-based journalist Robert Koehler in an article published Thursday in Common Dreams.
Koehler continued, "They have made no real effort to pursue global nuclear disarmament by getting rid of their own arsenals, as they agreed to do when they signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which went into effect in 1970."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A top Iranian official on Wednesday slammed world powers for failing to meet their own promises to eliminate their nuclear arsenals and contribute to global non-proliferation.
Gholam Hossein Dehghani, Iran's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, made the statements in an address to the UN's Disarmament Commission.
Dehgani criticized nuclear weapons states for falling far short on commitments they made in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), first implemented more than four decades ago.
Dehgani's statements specifically targeted China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States--the five nuclear weapons states that have signed the NPT. Israel, India, Pakistan and also known atomic weapons states, and according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, North Korea possesses nuclear weapons as well.
There is no known evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program or intends to create one.
"The NPT, which was the foundation of the nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation regime, had succeeded in constraining the spread of nuclear weapons because non-nuclear-weapon States had kept their end of the bargain," said Dehgani, according to the UN's summary of his statements.
"The prospect for establishing a zone free of those weapons in the Middle East would be enhanced when certain nuclear-weapon States abandoned their unconstructive policy of exempting Israel from the NPT," Dehgani continued.
A report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute released last year found that "all the nuclear-armed states are modernizing their remaining nuclear forces and appear determined to retain sizeable nuclear arsenals for the foreseeable future."
The administration of President Barack Obama is currently proposing a $348 billion dollar plan to "rebuild the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal, including the warheads, and the missiles, planes and submarines that carry them," wrote Stephen Young, senior analyst at Union of Concerned Scientists, in an article published last month.
Dehgani's statements came days after a framework nuclear agreement was reached between Iran and the five members of the United Nations Security Council (U.S., Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France) plus Germany.
"The deeper problem with the P5+1 agreement with Iran is not the controversy it has generated among the bomb-Iran contingent but the unacknowledged hypocrisy of the P5 nations -- the U.S., Russia, China, Great Britain and France -- which, of course, are all nuclear powers themselves," wrote Chicago-based journalist Robert Koehler in an article published Thursday in Common Dreams.
Koehler continued, "They have made no real effort to pursue global nuclear disarmament by getting rid of their own arsenals, as they agreed to do when they signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which went into effect in 1970."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.