SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Historic Chicago Runoff Election, it's Grassroots vs. the One Percent
With platforms on opposite ends of the spectrum, Chicago mayoral candidates Rahm Emanuel and Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia face off
Apr 07, 2015
Chicago voters on Tuesday went to the polls to choose between incumbent Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his populist challenger, Cook County commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, in a runoff mayoral election which has come to symbolize the fight between corporate interests and progressive ideals.
As CNN reports, polls on Tuesday morning showed Emanuel leading by double digit margins, but the unique nature of the election as Chicago's first-ever runoff makes the outcome hard to predict.
"I'm glad it went to a runoff. I think it's important that the candidates were forced to have conversations," one voter, Carlee Taggart, told the Chicago Sun-Times. "There could be a change and that could be a good thing, and if not, at least we forced a conversation."
Those conversations centered around three core issues of Emanuel and Garcia's platforms: budget, education, and the future of Chicago's vastly differing neighborhoods, particularly its under-served black and Hispanic communities.
Emanuel's extensive financial resources and Washington, D.C. connections--he is a former member of the U.S. Congress and served as President Barack Obama's first chief of staff--has framed him as a corporate-friendly politician with a track record that Chicago-based reporter Rick Perlstein called "strikingly corrupt." In 2014, journalist Kari Lydersen dubbed him "Mayor One Percent."
Garcia's backing comes largely from teacher and labor unions--as well as an endorsement from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--and his connection to working-class residents of the city has depicted him as a progressive candidate with humble origins and grassroots support.
As the New York Times explains, the winner will depend on whose key messages have struck a more resounding chord with voters: "Mr. Garcia's stance for ordinary people? Or Mr. Emanuel's argument that he is the only one qualified to wrestle with Chicago's fiscal challenges?"
While Emanuel has referred to the election as the "battle for Chicago's future," the Times notes that its outcome has significance in the larger playing field of U.S. politics:
There are parallels between the Chicago mayoral race and other fights within the Democratic Party. In his first term, Mr. Emanuel has emerged as a pragmatic, centrist Democrat who has pushed an agenda of education and pension reform while also encouraging major corporate development in the city and accepting large donations from the wealthy. Mr. Garcia has carved out a space even further to the left by saying he would focus on Chicago's economically depressed neighborhoods on the South and West Sides. He has called Mr. Emanuel a tool of the "rich and powerful." Mr. Emanuel has been a top aide to President Obama and former President Bill Clinton; Mr. Garcia says he admires Howard Dean and Elizabeth Warren and hopes to follow their example.
Whoever wins could represent the direction of the Democratic Party going forward.
The election is being tracked on Twitter under the hashtag #ChicagoElection2015.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Chicago voters on Tuesday went to the polls to choose between incumbent Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his populist challenger, Cook County commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, in a runoff mayoral election which has come to symbolize the fight between corporate interests and progressive ideals.
As CNN reports, polls on Tuesday morning showed Emanuel leading by double digit margins, but the unique nature of the election as Chicago's first-ever runoff makes the outcome hard to predict.
"I'm glad it went to a runoff. I think it's important that the candidates were forced to have conversations," one voter, Carlee Taggart, told the Chicago Sun-Times. "There could be a change and that could be a good thing, and if not, at least we forced a conversation."
Those conversations centered around three core issues of Emanuel and Garcia's platforms: budget, education, and the future of Chicago's vastly differing neighborhoods, particularly its under-served black and Hispanic communities.
Emanuel's extensive financial resources and Washington, D.C. connections--he is a former member of the U.S. Congress and served as President Barack Obama's first chief of staff--has framed him as a corporate-friendly politician with a track record that Chicago-based reporter Rick Perlstein called "strikingly corrupt." In 2014, journalist Kari Lydersen dubbed him "Mayor One Percent."
Garcia's backing comes largely from teacher and labor unions--as well as an endorsement from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--and his connection to working-class residents of the city has depicted him as a progressive candidate with humble origins and grassroots support.
As the New York Times explains, the winner will depend on whose key messages have struck a more resounding chord with voters: "Mr. Garcia's stance for ordinary people? Or Mr. Emanuel's argument that he is the only one qualified to wrestle with Chicago's fiscal challenges?"
While Emanuel has referred to the election as the "battle for Chicago's future," the Times notes that its outcome has significance in the larger playing field of U.S. politics:
There are parallels between the Chicago mayoral race and other fights within the Democratic Party. In his first term, Mr. Emanuel has emerged as a pragmatic, centrist Democrat who has pushed an agenda of education and pension reform while also encouraging major corporate development in the city and accepting large donations from the wealthy. Mr. Garcia has carved out a space even further to the left by saying he would focus on Chicago's economically depressed neighborhoods on the South and West Sides. He has called Mr. Emanuel a tool of the "rich and powerful." Mr. Emanuel has been a top aide to President Obama and former President Bill Clinton; Mr. Garcia says he admires Howard Dean and Elizabeth Warren and hopes to follow their example.
Whoever wins could represent the direction of the Democratic Party going forward.
The election is being tracked on Twitter under the hashtag #ChicagoElection2015.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Chicago voters on Tuesday went to the polls to choose between incumbent Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his populist challenger, Cook County commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, in a runoff mayoral election which has come to symbolize the fight between corporate interests and progressive ideals.
As CNN reports, polls on Tuesday morning showed Emanuel leading by double digit margins, but the unique nature of the election as Chicago's first-ever runoff makes the outcome hard to predict.
"I'm glad it went to a runoff. I think it's important that the candidates were forced to have conversations," one voter, Carlee Taggart, told the Chicago Sun-Times. "There could be a change and that could be a good thing, and if not, at least we forced a conversation."
Those conversations centered around three core issues of Emanuel and Garcia's platforms: budget, education, and the future of Chicago's vastly differing neighborhoods, particularly its under-served black and Hispanic communities.
Emanuel's extensive financial resources and Washington, D.C. connections--he is a former member of the U.S. Congress and served as President Barack Obama's first chief of staff--has framed him as a corporate-friendly politician with a track record that Chicago-based reporter Rick Perlstein called "strikingly corrupt." In 2014, journalist Kari Lydersen dubbed him "Mayor One Percent."
Garcia's backing comes largely from teacher and labor unions--as well as an endorsement from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--and his connection to working-class residents of the city has depicted him as a progressive candidate with humble origins and grassroots support.
As the New York Times explains, the winner will depend on whose key messages have struck a more resounding chord with voters: "Mr. Garcia's stance for ordinary people? Or Mr. Emanuel's argument that he is the only one qualified to wrestle with Chicago's fiscal challenges?"
While Emanuel has referred to the election as the "battle for Chicago's future," the Times notes that its outcome has significance in the larger playing field of U.S. politics:
There are parallels between the Chicago mayoral race and other fights within the Democratic Party. In his first term, Mr. Emanuel has emerged as a pragmatic, centrist Democrat who has pushed an agenda of education and pension reform while also encouraging major corporate development in the city and accepting large donations from the wealthy. Mr. Garcia has carved out a space even further to the left by saying he would focus on Chicago's economically depressed neighborhoods on the South and West Sides. He has called Mr. Emanuel a tool of the "rich and powerful." Mr. Emanuel has been a top aide to President Obama and former President Bill Clinton; Mr. Garcia says he admires Howard Dean and Elizabeth Warren and hopes to follow their example.
Whoever wins could represent the direction of the Democratic Party going forward.
The election is being tracked on Twitter under the hashtag #ChicagoElection2015.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.