US Addiction to Corn and Cars Is Fueling Global Hunger and Displacement
U.S. and E.U. biofuel mandates 'drive up the cost and increase the volatility of food prices,' says report
Driven by the United States, global demand for food-based biofuels such as corn ethanol is unsustainable, threatening the food security of some of the world's poorest people and endangering already strained land and water resources, according to a new research published this week.
"Mandating Hunger: The Impacts of Global Biofuels Mandates and Targets" (pdf) was issued Tuesday by ActionAid USA, an international non-profit working to end poverty around the world. The study charges that "[b]y creating an inflexible and growing demand, mandates drive up the cost and increase the volatility of food prices."
Government mandates to increase or maintain levels of biofuel blends in transportation fuel, with the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard and the E.U. Renewable Energy Directive being the most prominent examples, encourage biofuel production and consumption worldwide. The United States and the European Union are projected to account for at least 60 percent of global biofuel consumption in 2025.
"Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks. No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
--Kelly Stone, ActionAid USA
Furthermore, states the report, "Demand for biofuels is also associated with land grabs in developing countries, where smallholder farmers growing food for their families are forced off their land to make way for energy crops for export."
In Guatemala, for instance, subsistence farmers are being forced to give up cultivation of multiple food crops for local consumption in order to cultivate just one crop that will likely be exported and used for fuel instead of food. Monoculture crops such as sugarcane or palm--both used as feedstocks for biofuels production--now take up 14 percent of the country's land, while small land holders use only 12 percent.
"In a country where half of children under the age of five are malnourished, more land is devoted to export crops than sustenance farming," reads the report.
Kelly Stone, biofuels policy analyst at ActionAid, painted a stark picture: "Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks," she said. "No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
The ActionAid report was adapted from a recent working paper authored by Timothy Wise and Emily Cole of the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Their analysis "suggests the need for governments to cease the implementation and expansion of current food-based biofuels consumption mandates and to forgo the creation of new mandates," which they say prop up demand. They also recommend eliminating incentives for biofuels that impact the fuel supply.
Such incentives, of course, are the bread and butter of Midwestern corn producers, which explains why attempts by the federal government to reduce how much ethanol must be blended into the country's motor-fuel supply are vehemently opposed by members of Congress from that region.
"Mandates must be scaled back. Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."
--Tim Wise & Emily Cole, Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University
"Regulatory and legislative efforts to weaken the Renewable Fuel Standard are misguided and fail to acknowledge the success of renewable fuels," U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa) reportedly said at a biofuels summit in Washington, D.C.
Wise and Cole point out that the U.S. not only consumes the most biofuels, but it uses mostly corn, the source that provides "the fewest environmental benefits and most directly competes with food and feed markets."
"Mandates must be scaled back," they declare. "Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Driven by the United States, global demand for food-based biofuels such as corn ethanol is unsustainable, threatening the food security of some of the world's poorest people and endangering already strained land and water resources, according to a new research published this week.
"Mandating Hunger: The Impacts of Global Biofuels Mandates and Targets" (pdf) was issued Tuesday by ActionAid USA, an international non-profit working to end poverty around the world. The study charges that "[b]y creating an inflexible and growing demand, mandates drive up the cost and increase the volatility of food prices."
Government mandates to increase or maintain levels of biofuel blends in transportation fuel, with the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard and the E.U. Renewable Energy Directive being the most prominent examples, encourage biofuel production and consumption worldwide. The United States and the European Union are projected to account for at least 60 percent of global biofuel consumption in 2025.
"Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks. No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
--Kelly Stone, ActionAid USA
Furthermore, states the report, "Demand for biofuels is also associated with land grabs in developing countries, where smallholder farmers growing food for their families are forced off their land to make way for energy crops for export."
In Guatemala, for instance, subsistence farmers are being forced to give up cultivation of multiple food crops for local consumption in order to cultivate just one crop that will likely be exported and used for fuel instead of food. Monoculture crops such as sugarcane or palm--both used as feedstocks for biofuels production--now take up 14 percent of the country's land, while small land holders use only 12 percent.
"In a country where half of children under the age of five are malnourished, more land is devoted to export crops than sustenance farming," reads the report.
Kelly Stone, biofuels policy analyst at ActionAid, painted a stark picture: "Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks," she said. "No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
The ActionAid report was adapted from a recent working paper authored by Timothy Wise and Emily Cole of the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Their analysis "suggests the need for governments to cease the implementation and expansion of current food-based biofuels consumption mandates and to forgo the creation of new mandates," which they say prop up demand. They also recommend eliminating incentives for biofuels that impact the fuel supply.
Such incentives, of course, are the bread and butter of Midwestern corn producers, which explains why attempts by the federal government to reduce how much ethanol must be blended into the country's motor-fuel supply are vehemently opposed by members of Congress from that region.
"Mandates must be scaled back. Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."
--Tim Wise & Emily Cole, Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University
"Regulatory and legislative efforts to weaken the Renewable Fuel Standard are misguided and fail to acknowledge the success of renewable fuels," U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa) reportedly said at a biofuels summit in Washington, D.C.
Wise and Cole point out that the U.S. not only consumes the most biofuels, but it uses mostly corn, the source that provides "the fewest environmental benefits and most directly competes with food and feed markets."
"Mandates must be scaled back," they declare. "Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."
Driven by the United States, global demand for food-based biofuels such as corn ethanol is unsustainable, threatening the food security of some of the world's poorest people and endangering already strained land and water resources, according to a new research published this week.
"Mandating Hunger: The Impacts of Global Biofuels Mandates and Targets" (pdf) was issued Tuesday by ActionAid USA, an international non-profit working to end poverty around the world. The study charges that "[b]y creating an inflexible and growing demand, mandates drive up the cost and increase the volatility of food prices."
Government mandates to increase or maintain levels of biofuel blends in transportation fuel, with the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard and the E.U. Renewable Energy Directive being the most prominent examples, encourage biofuel production and consumption worldwide. The United States and the European Union are projected to account for at least 60 percent of global biofuel consumption in 2025.
"Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks. No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
--Kelly Stone, ActionAid USA
Furthermore, states the report, "Demand for biofuels is also associated with land grabs in developing countries, where smallholder farmers growing food for their families are forced off their land to make way for energy crops for export."
In Guatemala, for instance, subsistence farmers are being forced to give up cultivation of multiple food crops for local consumption in order to cultivate just one crop that will likely be exported and used for fuel instead of food. Monoculture crops such as sugarcane or palm--both used as feedstocks for biofuels production--now take up 14 percent of the country's land, while small land holders use only 12 percent.
"In a country where half of children under the age of five are malnourished, more land is devoted to export crops than sustenance farming," reads the report.
Kelly Stone, biofuels policy analyst at ActionAid, painted a stark picture: "Farmers in poor communities around the world are being kicked off their land to produce fuel for our cars and trucks," she said. "No one should go hungry to fill our gas tanks."
The ActionAid report was adapted from a recent working paper authored by Timothy Wise and Emily Cole of the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Their analysis "suggests the need for governments to cease the implementation and expansion of current food-based biofuels consumption mandates and to forgo the creation of new mandates," which they say prop up demand. They also recommend eliminating incentives for biofuels that impact the fuel supply.
Such incentives, of course, are the bread and butter of Midwestern corn producers, which explains why attempts by the federal government to reduce how much ethanol must be blended into the country's motor-fuel supply are vehemently opposed by members of Congress from that region.
"Mandates must be scaled back. Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."
--Tim Wise & Emily Cole, Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University
"Regulatory and legislative efforts to weaken the Renewable Fuel Standard are misguided and fail to acknowledge the success of renewable fuels," U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa) reportedly said at a biofuels summit in Washington, D.C.
Wise and Cole point out that the U.S. not only consumes the most biofuels, but it uses mostly corn, the source that provides "the fewest environmental benefits and most directly competes with food and feed markets."
"Mandates must be scaled back," they declare. "Otherwise, governments are mandating not just biofuel consumption but hunger and unsustainable resource use."