South Carolina City's Water Privatization Proposal Threatens Public Control
Organizer says plan could worsen services, increase rates
South Carolina's capital city is exploring the possibility of privatizing its water and sewage system, prompting warnings that it could spell higher costs and lack of public control over "our most essential resource."
Reporting for South Carolina's The State, John Monk wrote
A move to solicit written expressions of interest from private companies was approved by council in open session at an early January meeting, Mayor Steve Benjamin said at Tuesday night's council meeting. However, that approval received virtually no publicity.
Renee Maas, Senior Southern Region Organizer with Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams that the privatization could take different forms, with Columbia leasing or selling its assets, hiring consultants, or privatizing its management system.
Previous efforts to privatize the municipal systems elsewhere have show they can be costly for consumers, Maas said.
"Water rates tend to increase at three times the rate of inflation. This is pretty common," she said, adding that the private companies can cut corners and worsen service.
Further, "there's no incentive to conserve water for private companies because it becomes a monopoly. There's no incentive for private companies to fix a system, install green technologies or best practices. There's no competition for them."
Yet the "public does have a way to vote out the people running their water systems out or complain," she said. "When water is controlled by elected officials, the public can go to the elected officials." The private companies, in contrast, "are accountable to their stockholders, not the people they serve."
Mass stressed that it "is not at all a partisan issue because water belongs to everybody."
While there's been a trend of efforts to push forth water privatization, Mass said that "communities are fighting back."
She said her group and others in the community "plan to educate the public about the truth behind privatization and how it often leads to increased rates and loss of control over our most essential resource."
Water needs to be protected "in a way that is sustainable and equitable" now and for generations to come, she said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
South Carolina's capital city is exploring the possibility of privatizing its water and sewage system, prompting warnings that it could spell higher costs and lack of public control over "our most essential resource."
Reporting for South Carolina's The State, John Monk wrote
A move to solicit written expressions of interest from private companies was approved by council in open session at an early January meeting, Mayor Steve Benjamin said at Tuesday night's council meeting. However, that approval received virtually no publicity.
Renee Maas, Senior Southern Region Organizer with Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams that the privatization could take different forms, with Columbia leasing or selling its assets, hiring consultants, or privatizing its management system.
Previous efforts to privatize the municipal systems elsewhere have show they can be costly for consumers, Maas said.
"Water rates tend to increase at three times the rate of inflation. This is pretty common," she said, adding that the private companies can cut corners and worsen service.
Further, "there's no incentive to conserve water for private companies because it becomes a monopoly. There's no incentive for private companies to fix a system, install green technologies or best practices. There's no competition for them."
Yet the "public does have a way to vote out the people running their water systems out or complain," she said. "When water is controlled by elected officials, the public can go to the elected officials." The private companies, in contrast, "are accountable to their stockholders, not the people they serve."
Mass stressed that it "is not at all a partisan issue because water belongs to everybody."
While there's been a trend of efforts to push forth water privatization, Mass said that "communities are fighting back."
She said her group and others in the community "plan to educate the public about the truth behind privatization and how it often leads to increased rates and loss of control over our most essential resource."
Water needs to be protected "in a way that is sustainable and equitable" now and for generations to come, she said.
South Carolina's capital city is exploring the possibility of privatizing its water and sewage system, prompting warnings that it could spell higher costs and lack of public control over "our most essential resource."
Reporting for South Carolina's The State, John Monk wrote
A move to solicit written expressions of interest from private companies was approved by council in open session at an early January meeting, Mayor Steve Benjamin said at Tuesday night's council meeting. However, that approval received virtually no publicity.
Renee Maas, Senior Southern Region Organizer with Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams that the privatization could take different forms, with Columbia leasing or selling its assets, hiring consultants, or privatizing its management system.
Previous efforts to privatize the municipal systems elsewhere have show they can be costly for consumers, Maas said.
"Water rates tend to increase at three times the rate of inflation. This is pretty common," she said, adding that the private companies can cut corners and worsen service.
Further, "there's no incentive to conserve water for private companies because it becomes a monopoly. There's no incentive for private companies to fix a system, install green technologies or best practices. There's no competition for them."
Yet the "public does have a way to vote out the people running their water systems out or complain," she said. "When water is controlled by elected officials, the public can go to the elected officials." The private companies, in contrast, "are accountable to their stockholders, not the people they serve."
Mass stressed that it "is not at all a partisan issue because water belongs to everybody."
While there's been a trend of efforts to push forth water privatization, Mass said that "communities are fighting back."
She said her group and others in the community "plan to educate the public about the truth behind privatization and how it often leads to increased rates and loss of control over our most essential resource."
Water needs to be protected "in a way that is sustainable and equitable" now and for generations to come, she said.