Afghan Civilians Facing 'Disturbing Upward Spiral' of Violence
Number of women and children killed or wounded rose 'dramatically' in past six months
Violence soared in Afghanistan during the first six months of 2014, according to a report released amidst brewing political crisis and rising insurgency.
Between January 1 and June 30, 2014, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan documented 1,564 civilian deaths and 3,289 injured civilians, marking a 24 percent overall increase in Afghan civilian casualties compared to the same period last year, according to a mid-year report.
Total child civilian casualties increased 34 percent in the first six months of 2014 to 1,071, including 295 killed and 776 injured, while total women civilian casualties increased 24 per cent to 440, including 148 killed and 292 injured.
"In 2014, the fight is increasingly taking place in communities, public places, and near the homes of ordinary Afghans, with death and injury to women and children in a continued disturbing upward spiral," said Director of Human Rights for UNAMA, Georgette Gagnon.
The report was issued amidst ongoing violence and political controversy. An attack on a government compound in Kandahar on Wednesday left 30 dead, including four civilians. Meanwhile, contested election results threaten to further divide the populace.
The sharp increase in civilian deaths and injuries in 2014 resulted from escalating ground engagements between anti-government elements" (all individuals and armed groups in conflict with the Afghan government and/or international military forces) and Afghan national security forces particularly in civilian-populated areas, according to the report.
For the first time since 2009, ground combat -- including crossfire, mortar attacks, and rocket-fired grenades -- was the leading cause of casualties, as opposed to improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which are now the second leading cause of death or injury.
"The nature of the conflict in Afghanistan is changing in 2014 with an escalation of ground engagements in civilian-populated areas," said the UN Special Representative for the Secretary-General in Afghanistan and head of UNAMA, Jan Kubis. "The impact on civilians, including the most vulnerable Afghans, is proving to be devastating."
UNAMA attributes some of the escalated violence to the transfer of security responsibility from international military forces to Afghan security forces, which left some areas more exposed and vulnerable to attacks by anti-government elements. U.S. and allied troops are scheduled to be out of the country by the end of this year, though President Barack Obama has said he wants to leave nearly 10,000 troops in Afghanistan to help train Afghan security forces and to stage counterterrorism operations.
But as Peace Action's Paul Kawika Martin pointed out in a May 28 op-ed, "[T]he surge of troops in 2009 and 2010 into the country failed to quell the violence, showing that large troop numbers neglect to lead to stability or lead to a democratic or even a well-governed Afghanistan...Also, history teaches us that local policing, working with the local populace, is far more likely to reduce terrorists than foreign forces that may increase recruitment by killing innocents and arousing resentments."
The UN report also shows that Afghanistan's presidential and Provincial Council elections, held in April and June, led to violence against civilians. In the first six months of the year, UNAMA documented 674 casualties (173 deaths and 501 injured) "from attacks directly targeting the electoral process," including ground engagements and IED attacks around polling centers or Independent Election Commission convoys.
Almost three-quarters of the causalities were blamed on anti-government forces. "While all parties to the conflict -- including Afghan national security forces -- must do more to uphold their obligations under international law to avoid harm to civilians, the onus is clearly on the Taliban and other anti-Government elements to reverse this trend and deliver on their stated commitments to do so," declared Kubis.
In response, the Taliban issued a statement that read: "Once again Taliban are blamed for the majority of civilian causalities in this report, which is clearly propaganda of the enemy. We want to make it clear that the lives, dignity and property of all civilians is a major and important goal of our jihad."
_____________________
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Violence soared in Afghanistan during the first six months of 2014, according to a report released amidst brewing political crisis and rising insurgency.
Between January 1 and June 30, 2014, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan documented 1,564 civilian deaths and 3,289 injured civilians, marking a 24 percent overall increase in Afghan civilian casualties compared to the same period last year, according to a mid-year report.
Total child civilian casualties increased 34 percent in the first six months of 2014 to 1,071, including 295 killed and 776 injured, while total women civilian casualties increased 24 per cent to 440, including 148 killed and 292 injured.
"In 2014, the fight is increasingly taking place in communities, public places, and near the homes of ordinary Afghans, with death and injury to women and children in a continued disturbing upward spiral," said Director of Human Rights for UNAMA, Georgette Gagnon.
The report was issued amidst ongoing violence and political controversy. An attack on a government compound in Kandahar on Wednesday left 30 dead, including four civilians. Meanwhile, contested election results threaten to further divide the populace.
The sharp increase in civilian deaths and injuries in 2014 resulted from escalating ground engagements between anti-government elements" (all individuals and armed groups in conflict with the Afghan government and/or international military forces) and Afghan national security forces particularly in civilian-populated areas, according to the report.
For the first time since 2009, ground combat -- including crossfire, mortar attacks, and rocket-fired grenades -- was the leading cause of casualties, as opposed to improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which are now the second leading cause of death or injury.
"The nature of the conflict in Afghanistan is changing in 2014 with an escalation of ground engagements in civilian-populated areas," said the UN Special Representative for the Secretary-General in Afghanistan and head of UNAMA, Jan Kubis. "The impact on civilians, including the most vulnerable Afghans, is proving to be devastating."
UNAMA attributes some of the escalated violence to the transfer of security responsibility from international military forces to Afghan security forces, which left some areas more exposed and vulnerable to attacks by anti-government elements. U.S. and allied troops are scheduled to be out of the country by the end of this year, though President Barack Obama has said he wants to leave nearly 10,000 troops in Afghanistan to help train Afghan security forces and to stage counterterrorism operations.
But as Peace Action's Paul Kawika Martin pointed out in a May 28 op-ed, "[T]he surge of troops in 2009 and 2010 into the country failed to quell the violence, showing that large troop numbers neglect to lead to stability or lead to a democratic or even a well-governed Afghanistan...Also, history teaches us that local policing, working with the local populace, is far more likely to reduce terrorists than foreign forces that may increase recruitment by killing innocents and arousing resentments."
The UN report also shows that Afghanistan's presidential and Provincial Council elections, held in April and June, led to violence against civilians. In the first six months of the year, UNAMA documented 674 casualties (173 deaths and 501 injured) "from attacks directly targeting the electoral process," including ground engagements and IED attacks around polling centers or Independent Election Commission convoys.
Almost three-quarters of the causalities were blamed on anti-government forces. "While all parties to the conflict -- including Afghan national security forces -- must do more to uphold their obligations under international law to avoid harm to civilians, the onus is clearly on the Taliban and other anti-Government elements to reverse this trend and deliver on their stated commitments to do so," declared Kubis.
In response, the Taliban issued a statement that read: "Once again Taliban are blamed for the majority of civilian causalities in this report, which is clearly propaganda of the enemy. We want to make it clear that the lives, dignity and property of all civilians is a major and important goal of our jihad."
_____________________
Violence soared in Afghanistan during the first six months of 2014, according to a report released amidst brewing political crisis and rising insurgency.
Between January 1 and June 30, 2014, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan documented 1,564 civilian deaths and 3,289 injured civilians, marking a 24 percent overall increase in Afghan civilian casualties compared to the same period last year, according to a mid-year report.
Total child civilian casualties increased 34 percent in the first six months of 2014 to 1,071, including 295 killed and 776 injured, while total women civilian casualties increased 24 per cent to 440, including 148 killed and 292 injured.
"In 2014, the fight is increasingly taking place in communities, public places, and near the homes of ordinary Afghans, with death and injury to women and children in a continued disturbing upward spiral," said Director of Human Rights for UNAMA, Georgette Gagnon.
The report was issued amidst ongoing violence and political controversy. An attack on a government compound in Kandahar on Wednesday left 30 dead, including four civilians. Meanwhile, contested election results threaten to further divide the populace.
The sharp increase in civilian deaths and injuries in 2014 resulted from escalating ground engagements between anti-government elements" (all individuals and armed groups in conflict with the Afghan government and/or international military forces) and Afghan national security forces particularly in civilian-populated areas, according to the report.
For the first time since 2009, ground combat -- including crossfire, mortar attacks, and rocket-fired grenades -- was the leading cause of casualties, as opposed to improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which are now the second leading cause of death or injury.
"The nature of the conflict in Afghanistan is changing in 2014 with an escalation of ground engagements in civilian-populated areas," said the UN Special Representative for the Secretary-General in Afghanistan and head of UNAMA, Jan Kubis. "The impact on civilians, including the most vulnerable Afghans, is proving to be devastating."
UNAMA attributes some of the escalated violence to the transfer of security responsibility from international military forces to Afghan security forces, which left some areas more exposed and vulnerable to attacks by anti-government elements. U.S. and allied troops are scheduled to be out of the country by the end of this year, though President Barack Obama has said he wants to leave nearly 10,000 troops in Afghanistan to help train Afghan security forces and to stage counterterrorism operations.
But as Peace Action's Paul Kawika Martin pointed out in a May 28 op-ed, "[T]he surge of troops in 2009 and 2010 into the country failed to quell the violence, showing that large troop numbers neglect to lead to stability or lead to a democratic or even a well-governed Afghanistan...Also, history teaches us that local policing, working with the local populace, is far more likely to reduce terrorists than foreign forces that may increase recruitment by killing innocents and arousing resentments."
The UN report also shows that Afghanistan's presidential and Provincial Council elections, held in April and June, led to violence against civilians. In the first six months of the year, UNAMA documented 674 casualties (173 deaths and 501 injured) "from attacks directly targeting the electoral process," including ground engagements and IED attacks around polling centers or Independent Election Commission convoys.
Almost three-quarters of the causalities were blamed on anti-government forces. "While all parties to the conflict -- including Afghan national security forces -- must do more to uphold their obligations under international law to avoid harm to civilians, the onus is clearly on the Taliban and other anti-Government elements to reverse this trend and deliver on their stated commitments to do so," declared Kubis.
In response, the Taliban issued a statement that read: "Once again Taliban are blamed for the majority of civilian causalities in this report, which is clearly propaganda of the enemy. We want to make it clear that the lives, dignity and property of all civilians is a major and important goal of our jihad."
_____________________