Tesla CEO Elon Musk. (Photo: Getty Images)
Billionaires Like Elon Musk Are the Most Dangerous People on Planet Earth
The best hope of averting climate disaster may well be wealth taxes that significantly reduce the wealth and power of the super-rich.
Watching Elon Musk reveal himself in recent weeks to be the world's richest buffoon has certainly been entertaining. However, it could lead to the conclusion that billionaires are silly but harmless--which is far from the truth.
The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
Yes, they are often silly. But they are rarely harmless. Indeed, they're among the most dangerous people to walk the earth.
And I'm not just referring to their hoarding of resources while much of the world goes hungry. The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
The problem is twofold. First, the carbon footprint of a billionaire is gigantic.
By contrast, the poorest half of the world's population--four billion people--hardly contribute to climate change at all. On average, each person in this deprived bottom half of humanity contributes only 1.6 tons of carbon a year.
However, the average person in the top one per cent of the global population contributes 110 tons of carbon a year, while the average person in the top .01 per cent contributes a monstrous 2,531 tons. Meanwhile, a billionaire typically contributes a jaw-dropping 8,190 tons.
So while the ranks of the superrich are small, their carbon emissions (from private jets, yachts and multiple homes) are so immense--and fast-growing--that they are a key driver of climate change.
Now we come to the second part of the problem: their role as corporate owners directing enormous pools of capital towards fossil fuel production and infrastructure.
In a new study, Oxfam notes that if the investments of billionaires are factored in, their average emissions move from thousands of times greater than an ordinary person to more than a million times greater.
Oxfam examined the investments of 125 billionaires and found that they were skewed toward fossil fuels. If these billionaires moved their investments to a fund that simply followed the S&P 500, the intensity of their emissions would be reduced by half.
Billionaires clearly have a choice where to put their money, but there are only rare exceptions to the pattern--such as Patagonia sportswear billionaire Yvon Chouinard, who put the company's ownership into a trust, declaring "Earth is now our only shareholder."
Most, however, use their capital--and the enormous political clout that comes with it--in ways that further our dependence on fossil fuels, both by investing in their production and infrastructure and by influencing governments to block climate action.
That influence can be observed at the COP27 climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, where more than 600 lobbyists and executives from fossil fuel-related industries are working hard--often ensconced right inside national delegations--to block climate progress.
Canada's official delegation includes eight industry supporters, including a senior vice-president of the Royal Bank of Canada, which invests heavily in fossil fuels.
With that kind of insider's seat, no wonder there's so little progress at these global climate gatherings.
Given the gigantic carbon footprints of the mega-rich and their oversized political influence, the best hope of averting climate disaster may well be wealth taxes that significantly reduce their wealth and power.
Oxfam argues that wealth taxes could help fund assistance for poor countries devastated by climate change, whose citizens have contributed almost nothing to the problem.
There are lots of other good reasons to introduce wealth taxes, which have been proposed by U.S. senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and in Canada by NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh.
But, despite the popularity of such taxes as well as the urgency of the climate crisis and other needs, momentum toward them has stalled.
Certainly, the Trudeau government has never been interested, instead merely imposing extra sales taxes on luxury cars and yachts--taxes which barely impact the superrich.
But if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau really were the climate warrior he poses as, he'd be listening less to the Royal Bank and more to groups desperately trying to save their countries from drowning in rising sea waters.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Watching Elon Musk reveal himself in recent weeks to be the world's richest buffoon has certainly been entertaining. However, it could lead to the conclusion that billionaires are silly but harmless--which is far from the truth.
The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
Yes, they are often silly. But they are rarely harmless. Indeed, they're among the most dangerous people to walk the earth.
And I'm not just referring to their hoarding of resources while much of the world goes hungry. The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
The problem is twofold. First, the carbon footprint of a billionaire is gigantic.
By contrast, the poorest half of the world's population--four billion people--hardly contribute to climate change at all. On average, each person in this deprived bottom half of humanity contributes only 1.6 tons of carbon a year.
However, the average person in the top one per cent of the global population contributes 110 tons of carbon a year, while the average person in the top .01 per cent contributes a monstrous 2,531 tons. Meanwhile, a billionaire typically contributes a jaw-dropping 8,190 tons.
So while the ranks of the superrich are small, their carbon emissions (from private jets, yachts and multiple homes) are so immense--and fast-growing--that they are a key driver of climate change.
Now we come to the second part of the problem: their role as corporate owners directing enormous pools of capital towards fossil fuel production and infrastructure.
In a new study, Oxfam notes that if the investments of billionaires are factored in, their average emissions move from thousands of times greater than an ordinary person to more than a million times greater.
Oxfam examined the investments of 125 billionaires and found that they were skewed toward fossil fuels. If these billionaires moved their investments to a fund that simply followed the S&P 500, the intensity of their emissions would be reduced by half.
Billionaires clearly have a choice where to put their money, but there are only rare exceptions to the pattern--such as Patagonia sportswear billionaire Yvon Chouinard, who put the company's ownership into a trust, declaring "Earth is now our only shareholder."
Most, however, use their capital--and the enormous political clout that comes with it--in ways that further our dependence on fossil fuels, both by investing in their production and infrastructure and by influencing governments to block climate action.
That influence can be observed at the COP27 climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, where more than 600 lobbyists and executives from fossil fuel-related industries are working hard--often ensconced right inside national delegations--to block climate progress.
Canada's official delegation includes eight industry supporters, including a senior vice-president of the Royal Bank of Canada, which invests heavily in fossil fuels.
With that kind of insider's seat, no wonder there's so little progress at these global climate gatherings.
Given the gigantic carbon footprints of the mega-rich and their oversized political influence, the best hope of averting climate disaster may well be wealth taxes that significantly reduce their wealth and power.
Oxfam argues that wealth taxes could help fund assistance for poor countries devastated by climate change, whose citizens have contributed almost nothing to the problem.
There are lots of other good reasons to introduce wealth taxes, which have been proposed by U.S. senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and in Canada by NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh.
But, despite the popularity of such taxes as well as the urgency of the climate crisis and other needs, momentum toward them has stalled.
Certainly, the Trudeau government has never been interested, instead merely imposing extra sales taxes on luxury cars and yachts--taxes which barely impact the superrich.
But if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau really were the climate warrior he poses as, he'd be listening less to the Royal Bank and more to groups desperately trying to save their countries from drowning in rising sea waters.
Watching Elon Musk reveal himself in recent weeks to be the world's richest buffoon has certainly been entertaining. However, it could lead to the conclusion that billionaires are silly but harmless--which is far from the truth.
The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
Yes, they are often silly. But they are rarely harmless. Indeed, they're among the most dangerous people to walk the earth.
And I'm not just referring to their hoarding of resources while much of the world goes hungry. The real danger they pose to humanity is their enormous and largely hidden role in the climate crisis.
The problem is twofold. First, the carbon footprint of a billionaire is gigantic.
By contrast, the poorest half of the world's population--four billion people--hardly contribute to climate change at all. On average, each person in this deprived bottom half of humanity contributes only 1.6 tons of carbon a year.
However, the average person in the top one per cent of the global population contributes 110 tons of carbon a year, while the average person in the top .01 per cent contributes a monstrous 2,531 tons. Meanwhile, a billionaire typically contributes a jaw-dropping 8,190 tons.
So while the ranks of the superrich are small, their carbon emissions (from private jets, yachts and multiple homes) are so immense--and fast-growing--that they are a key driver of climate change.
Now we come to the second part of the problem: their role as corporate owners directing enormous pools of capital towards fossil fuel production and infrastructure.
In a new study, Oxfam notes that if the investments of billionaires are factored in, their average emissions move from thousands of times greater than an ordinary person to more than a million times greater.
Oxfam examined the investments of 125 billionaires and found that they were skewed toward fossil fuels. If these billionaires moved their investments to a fund that simply followed the S&P 500, the intensity of their emissions would be reduced by half.
Billionaires clearly have a choice where to put their money, but there are only rare exceptions to the pattern--such as Patagonia sportswear billionaire Yvon Chouinard, who put the company's ownership into a trust, declaring "Earth is now our only shareholder."
Most, however, use their capital--and the enormous political clout that comes with it--in ways that further our dependence on fossil fuels, both by investing in their production and infrastructure and by influencing governments to block climate action.
That influence can be observed at the COP27 climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, where more than 600 lobbyists and executives from fossil fuel-related industries are working hard--often ensconced right inside national delegations--to block climate progress.
Canada's official delegation includes eight industry supporters, including a senior vice-president of the Royal Bank of Canada, which invests heavily in fossil fuels.
With that kind of insider's seat, no wonder there's so little progress at these global climate gatherings.
Given the gigantic carbon footprints of the mega-rich and their oversized political influence, the best hope of averting climate disaster may well be wealth taxes that significantly reduce their wealth and power.
Oxfam argues that wealth taxes could help fund assistance for poor countries devastated by climate change, whose citizens have contributed almost nothing to the problem.
There are lots of other good reasons to introduce wealth taxes, which have been proposed by U.S. senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and in Canada by NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh.
But, despite the popularity of such taxes as well as the urgency of the climate crisis and other needs, momentum toward them has stalled.
Certainly, the Trudeau government has never been interested, instead merely imposing extra sales taxes on luxury cars and yachts--taxes which barely impact the superrich.
But if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau really were the climate warrior he poses as, he'd be listening less to the Royal Bank and more to groups desperately trying to save their countries from drowning in rising sea waters.