

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

US President Donald Trump speaks at "Save America March" rally in Washington D.C., United States on January 06, 2021. (Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Will Donald Trump be held accountable for the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and what was a multi-layered conspiracy to overturn the results of the presidential election?
The very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated that, "We're just going to follow the facts wherever they lead ... to hold all perpetrators who are criminally responsible for January 6 accountable, regardless of their level, [or]their position..."
The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack has systematically revealed the facts, confirming what Republican Rep. Liz Cheney stated when she announced she would vote to impeach Donald Trump:
"On January 6, 2021 a violent mob attacked the United States Capitol to obstruct the process of our democracy and stop the counting of presidential electoral votes. This insurrection caused injury, death and destruction in the most sacred space in our Republic...," Cheney said.
"The president of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the president," she said. "The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a president of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."
The committee's investigation has confirmed what Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell stated: "The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people, and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific proceeding of the first branch of the federal government which they did not like."
This is a question of treason, a charge that should not be made lightly.
The Constitution defines the crime: "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Do Trump's actions meet the test of treason? Professor Carlton F.W. Larson, author of "On Treason: A Citizen's Guide to the Law"notes that the framers of the Constitution had "a very specific image in mind--men gathering with guns, forming an army and marching on the seat of government."Larson notes that few events in American history have matched that description as clearly as the sacking of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
Their purpose assaulted the very heart of democracy: trying to stop the congressional proceeding that would formally certify the transfer of power following a democratic election. As Larson noted, "At some point, you have to say, if that's not levying war against the United States, then what on earth is?"
The Justice Department has prosecuted over 800 people who participated in the attack on the Capitol. The most serious charges were directed at leaders of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, gangs that conspired to breach the Capitol in order to stop the proceedings and possibly kidnap or kill public officials.
They were charged, and some have pled guilty to, seditious conspiracy. They thought they were doing the bidding of Trump.
Reviewing the evidence in a hearing on whether to honor the subpoenas of the committee, a federal judge found that Trump had "most likely"committed at least two crimes: obstructing an official proceeding and engaging in a conspiracy to defraud the United States. He was not asked to rule on whether Trump had committed treason.
Prosecuting a former president is something that no prosecutor would take on lightly. A trial would no doubt be a bitter national trauma.
Yet, the very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Trump's responsibility for the crimes that occurred is clear. And worse, he not only has expressed no remorse for his actions, he has spread the Big Lie relentlessly, and enlisted partisans across the country to attack election officials, change election laws, and leave the country more vulnerable to another assault on democracy.
Accountability under the law serves as a deterrence for those who would seek to violate it in the future. That is why the Justice Department has prosecuted 800-plus perpetrators with more to come. And that is why the attorney general must follow the evidence and bring to justice all those responsible for the attack, including the undeniable instigator: Donald Trump.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Will Donald Trump be held accountable for the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and what was a multi-layered conspiracy to overturn the results of the presidential election?
The very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated that, "We're just going to follow the facts wherever they lead ... to hold all perpetrators who are criminally responsible for January 6 accountable, regardless of their level, [or]their position..."
The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack has systematically revealed the facts, confirming what Republican Rep. Liz Cheney stated when she announced she would vote to impeach Donald Trump:
"On January 6, 2021 a violent mob attacked the United States Capitol to obstruct the process of our democracy and stop the counting of presidential electoral votes. This insurrection caused injury, death and destruction in the most sacred space in our Republic...," Cheney said.
"The president of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the president," she said. "The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a president of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."
The committee's investigation has confirmed what Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell stated: "The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people, and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific proceeding of the first branch of the federal government which they did not like."
This is a question of treason, a charge that should not be made lightly.
The Constitution defines the crime: "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Do Trump's actions meet the test of treason? Professor Carlton F.W. Larson, author of "On Treason: A Citizen's Guide to the Law"notes that the framers of the Constitution had "a very specific image in mind--men gathering with guns, forming an army and marching on the seat of government."Larson notes that few events in American history have matched that description as clearly as the sacking of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
Their purpose assaulted the very heart of democracy: trying to stop the congressional proceeding that would formally certify the transfer of power following a democratic election. As Larson noted, "At some point, you have to say, if that's not levying war against the United States, then what on earth is?"
The Justice Department has prosecuted over 800 people who participated in the attack on the Capitol. The most serious charges were directed at leaders of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, gangs that conspired to breach the Capitol in order to stop the proceedings and possibly kidnap or kill public officials.
They were charged, and some have pled guilty to, seditious conspiracy. They thought they were doing the bidding of Trump.
Reviewing the evidence in a hearing on whether to honor the subpoenas of the committee, a federal judge found that Trump had "most likely"committed at least two crimes: obstructing an official proceeding and engaging in a conspiracy to defraud the United States. He was not asked to rule on whether Trump had committed treason.
Prosecuting a former president is something that no prosecutor would take on lightly. A trial would no doubt be a bitter national trauma.
Yet, the very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Trump's responsibility for the crimes that occurred is clear. And worse, he not only has expressed no remorse for his actions, he has spread the Big Lie relentlessly, and enlisted partisans across the country to attack election officials, change election laws, and leave the country more vulnerable to another assault on democracy.
Accountability under the law serves as a deterrence for those who would seek to violate it in the future. That is why the Justice Department has prosecuted 800-plus perpetrators with more to come. And that is why the attorney general must follow the evidence and bring to justice all those responsible for the attack, including the undeniable instigator: Donald Trump.
Will Donald Trump be held accountable for the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and what was a multi-layered conspiracy to overturn the results of the presidential election?
The very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated that, "We're just going to follow the facts wherever they lead ... to hold all perpetrators who are criminally responsible for January 6 accountable, regardless of their level, [or]their position..."
The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack has systematically revealed the facts, confirming what Republican Rep. Liz Cheney stated when she announced she would vote to impeach Donald Trump:
"On January 6, 2021 a violent mob attacked the United States Capitol to obstruct the process of our democracy and stop the counting of presidential electoral votes. This insurrection caused injury, death and destruction in the most sacred space in our Republic...," Cheney said.
"The president of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the president," she said. "The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a president of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."
The committee's investigation has confirmed what Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell stated: "The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people, and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific proceeding of the first branch of the federal government which they did not like."
This is a question of treason, a charge that should not be made lightly.
The Constitution defines the crime: "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Do Trump's actions meet the test of treason? Professor Carlton F.W. Larson, author of "On Treason: A Citizen's Guide to the Law"notes that the framers of the Constitution had "a very specific image in mind--men gathering with guns, forming an army and marching on the seat of government."Larson notes that few events in American history have matched that description as clearly as the sacking of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
Their purpose assaulted the very heart of democracy: trying to stop the congressional proceeding that would formally certify the transfer of power following a democratic election. As Larson noted, "At some point, you have to say, if that's not levying war against the United States, then what on earth is?"
The Justice Department has prosecuted over 800 people who participated in the attack on the Capitol. The most serious charges were directed at leaders of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, gangs that conspired to breach the Capitol in order to stop the proceedings and possibly kidnap or kill public officials.
They were charged, and some have pled guilty to, seditious conspiracy. They thought they were doing the bidding of Trump.
Reviewing the evidence in a hearing on whether to honor the subpoenas of the committee, a federal judge found that Trump had "most likely"committed at least two crimes: obstructing an official proceeding and engaging in a conspiracy to defraud the United States. He was not asked to rule on whether Trump had committed treason.
Prosecuting a former president is something that no prosecutor would take on lightly. A trial would no doubt be a bitter national trauma.
Yet, the very essence of the rule of law is that no person--not a governor or a general, a billionaire or an oligarch, or even a former president--is above the law.
Trump's responsibility for the crimes that occurred is clear. And worse, he not only has expressed no remorse for his actions, he has spread the Big Lie relentlessly, and enlisted partisans across the country to attack election officials, change election laws, and leave the country more vulnerable to another assault on democracy.
Accountability under the law serves as a deterrence for those who would seek to violate it in the future. That is why the Justice Department has prosecuted 800-plus perpetrators with more to come. And that is why the attorney general must follow the evidence and bring to justice all those responsible for the attack, including the undeniable instigator: Donald Trump.