SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"As in other states driving voter suppression, there are no good justifications for these Arizona bills--or the resolution against the For the People Act," writes Sweren-Becker. (Photo: Joe Sohm/Visions of America/Getty)
Arizona Republicans Declare Their Opposition to Democracy
After officially objecting to the federal reforms in the For the People Act, the state legislature is considering a raft of voter suppression bills.
Apr 11, 2021
On Wednesday, the Arizona Legislature passed a resolution decrying sensible federal reforms in the For the People Act, a robust pro-democracy bill that has passed the House and is now pending in the Senate.
The state legislature did not skimp on hyperbole, accusing the federal government of "obliterating" the constitutional arrangements that hold our country together and "usurping" constitutional power. (In addition to being overblown, these accusations are also flatly incorrect about Congress's authority.) This over-the-top language goes hand in hand with Republican lawmakers' attempts, like their counterparts in Georgia and Texas, to enact new voter suppression laws that the For the People Act would combat.
"Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts."
Other troublesome bills that have been introduced in Arizona include S.B. 1485, which would allow officials to purge people from the early voting list if they do not vote in both the primary and general election in two consecutive election cycles for which there is a federal, statewide, or legislative race on the ballot.
Another is S.B. 1713, which would establish burdensome ID requirements for mail voters when returning their ballot. It would require voters to include their date of birth and one of two acceptable ID numbers: an Arizona driver's license number or voter registration number. Voter registration numbers are not readily available, and in 14 counties a voter needs a driver's license number to retrieve their voter registration info. This is a problem, as there are many voters who don't have a license.
And there is also S.B. 1003, which would make it harder for eligible voters to have their mail ballots counted if they forget to sign the ballot envelope.
As in other states driving voter suppression, there are no good justifications for these Arizona bills -- or the resolution against the For the People Act.
The positive reforms in the For the People Act are popular because Americans support restoring balance to our democracy. It would ensure that voting options are equally accessible across all 50 states, put a check on billionaires' ability to buy our elections, and help ensure that voters can elect leaders who are accountable to them.
Specifically, the For the People Act would require states to use automatic voter registration, expand early voting, and reduce barriers to voting by mail. It would also use small-donor public financing to empower ordinary Americans instead of big donors -- at no cost to taxpayers. Additionally, it would put in place much-needed campaign finance reforms, an end to partisan gerrymandering, and overhaul federal ethics rules. Critically, the bill would thwart virtually every vote suppression bill currently pending in the states.
In Arizona, the For the People Act would counteract the suppressive bills we are monitoring. If enacted, it would mitigate the harm of purging voters from the early voting list by requiring that all voters receive absentee ballot applications. It would also prevent the addition of redundant identification numbers on vote-by-mail ballots and set minimum standards for best practices for signature verification. Voters would have the ability to cure a missing signature within 10 days of the notice of the missing signature.
These provisions in the For the People Act would negate Arizona's proposed restrictions, which are doubly egregious because they change longstanding procedures that have worked well for years.
The For the People Act would mend and protect our democracy. But to the politicians in the Arizona Legislature who are more worried about holding on to power, a federal bill that makes it easier for people to vote presents a problem -- and this might be what drove them to pass the resolution condemning the bill.
Let's not mince words about the false rhetoric underpinning this push to shut the door on voters and reject such a popular bill. Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts.
Elected leaders must strengthen the systems underpinning our democracy. Voters know this, and that's why they support the components of the For the People Act. The Arizona Legislature would do well to follow suit.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Brennan Center for Justice
Eliza Sweren-Becker
Eliza Sweren-Becker serves as counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, where she focuses on voting rights and elections. Prior to joining the Brennan Center, Sweren-Becker was a litigation associate in private practice at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
On Wednesday, the Arizona Legislature passed a resolution decrying sensible federal reforms in the For the People Act, a robust pro-democracy bill that has passed the House and is now pending in the Senate.
The state legislature did not skimp on hyperbole, accusing the federal government of "obliterating" the constitutional arrangements that hold our country together and "usurping" constitutional power. (In addition to being overblown, these accusations are also flatly incorrect about Congress's authority.) This over-the-top language goes hand in hand with Republican lawmakers' attempts, like their counterparts in Georgia and Texas, to enact new voter suppression laws that the For the People Act would combat.
"Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts."
Other troublesome bills that have been introduced in Arizona include S.B. 1485, which would allow officials to purge people from the early voting list if they do not vote in both the primary and general election in two consecutive election cycles for which there is a federal, statewide, or legislative race on the ballot.
Another is S.B. 1713, which would establish burdensome ID requirements for mail voters when returning their ballot. It would require voters to include their date of birth and one of two acceptable ID numbers: an Arizona driver's license number or voter registration number. Voter registration numbers are not readily available, and in 14 counties a voter needs a driver's license number to retrieve their voter registration info. This is a problem, as there are many voters who don't have a license.
And there is also S.B. 1003, which would make it harder for eligible voters to have their mail ballots counted if they forget to sign the ballot envelope.
As in other states driving voter suppression, there are no good justifications for these Arizona bills -- or the resolution against the For the People Act.
The positive reforms in the For the People Act are popular because Americans support restoring balance to our democracy. It would ensure that voting options are equally accessible across all 50 states, put a check on billionaires' ability to buy our elections, and help ensure that voters can elect leaders who are accountable to them.
Specifically, the For the People Act would require states to use automatic voter registration, expand early voting, and reduce barriers to voting by mail. It would also use small-donor public financing to empower ordinary Americans instead of big donors -- at no cost to taxpayers. Additionally, it would put in place much-needed campaign finance reforms, an end to partisan gerrymandering, and overhaul federal ethics rules. Critically, the bill would thwart virtually every vote suppression bill currently pending in the states.
In Arizona, the For the People Act would counteract the suppressive bills we are monitoring. If enacted, it would mitigate the harm of purging voters from the early voting list by requiring that all voters receive absentee ballot applications. It would also prevent the addition of redundant identification numbers on vote-by-mail ballots and set minimum standards for best practices for signature verification. Voters would have the ability to cure a missing signature within 10 days of the notice of the missing signature.
These provisions in the For the People Act would negate Arizona's proposed restrictions, which are doubly egregious because they change longstanding procedures that have worked well for years.
The For the People Act would mend and protect our democracy. But to the politicians in the Arizona Legislature who are more worried about holding on to power, a federal bill that makes it easier for people to vote presents a problem -- and this might be what drove them to pass the resolution condemning the bill.
Let's not mince words about the false rhetoric underpinning this push to shut the door on voters and reject such a popular bill. Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts.
Elected leaders must strengthen the systems underpinning our democracy. Voters know this, and that's why they support the components of the For the People Act. The Arizona Legislature would do well to follow suit.
Eliza Sweren-Becker
Eliza Sweren-Becker serves as counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, where she focuses on voting rights and elections. Prior to joining the Brennan Center, Sweren-Becker was a litigation associate in private practice at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
On Wednesday, the Arizona Legislature passed a resolution decrying sensible federal reforms in the For the People Act, a robust pro-democracy bill that has passed the House and is now pending in the Senate.
The state legislature did not skimp on hyperbole, accusing the federal government of "obliterating" the constitutional arrangements that hold our country together and "usurping" constitutional power. (In addition to being overblown, these accusations are also flatly incorrect about Congress's authority.) This over-the-top language goes hand in hand with Republican lawmakers' attempts, like their counterparts in Georgia and Texas, to enact new voter suppression laws that the For the People Act would combat.
"Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts."
Other troublesome bills that have been introduced in Arizona include S.B. 1485, which would allow officials to purge people from the early voting list if they do not vote in both the primary and general election in two consecutive election cycles for which there is a federal, statewide, or legislative race on the ballot.
Another is S.B. 1713, which would establish burdensome ID requirements for mail voters when returning their ballot. It would require voters to include their date of birth and one of two acceptable ID numbers: an Arizona driver's license number or voter registration number. Voter registration numbers are not readily available, and in 14 counties a voter needs a driver's license number to retrieve their voter registration info. This is a problem, as there are many voters who don't have a license.
And there is also S.B. 1003, which would make it harder for eligible voters to have their mail ballots counted if they forget to sign the ballot envelope.
As in other states driving voter suppression, there are no good justifications for these Arizona bills -- or the resolution against the For the People Act.
The positive reforms in the For the People Act are popular because Americans support restoring balance to our democracy. It would ensure that voting options are equally accessible across all 50 states, put a check on billionaires' ability to buy our elections, and help ensure that voters can elect leaders who are accountable to them.
Specifically, the For the People Act would require states to use automatic voter registration, expand early voting, and reduce barriers to voting by mail. It would also use small-donor public financing to empower ordinary Americans instead of big donors -- at no cost to taxpayers. Additionally, it would put in place much-needed campaign finance reforms, an end to partisan gerrymandering, and overhaul federal ethics rules. Critically, the bill would thwart virtually every vote suppression bill currently pending in the states.
In Arizona, the For the People Act would counteract the suppressive bills we are monitoring. If enacted, it would mitigate the harm of purging voters from the early voting list by requiring that all voters receive absentee ballot applications. It would also prevent the addition of redundant identification numbers on vote-by-mail ballots and set minimum standards for best practices for signature verification. Voters would have the ability to cure a missing signature within 10 days of the notice of the missing signature.
These provisions in the For the People Act would negate Arizona's proposed restrictions, which are doubly egregious because they change longstanding procedures that have worked well for years.
The For the People Act would mend and protect our democracy. But to the politicians in the Arizona Legislature who are more worried about holding on to power, a federal bill that makes it easier for people to vote presents a problem -- and this might be what drove them to pass the resolution condemning the bill.
Let's not mince words about the false rhetoric underpinning this push to shut the door on voters and reject such a popular bill. Dangerous, intentional, and partisan lies about the integrity of our elections drive these extreme and anti-democratic efforts.
Elected leaders must strengthen the systems underpinning our democracy. Voters know this, and that's why they support the components of the For the People Act. The Arizona Legislature would do well to follow suit.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.