To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
Final Showdown: PG&E at the Brink of Nuclear Bankruptcy

The question of ownership--private or public--cannot be answered without accounting for the structural safety and potential liabilities of the two decrepit megaliths at San Luis Obispo. (Photo: Wikimedia)

Final Showdown: PG&E at the Brink of Nuclear Bankruptcy

The same pattern of lethal neglect and deferred maintenance that made PG&E the proven culprit in murderous wildfires is being repeated at Diablo Canyon.

Powerful forces are quickly moving Pacific Gas & Electric toward a settlement on its hideously complex multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy case. Thankfully, Governor Gavin Newsom has put at least a temporary hold on a final agreement.

But in the interim, it must be brought to light that no squaring of PG&E's accounts--with the people of California, the utility's fire victims, the governor, the Public Utilities Commission, the banks, or the planet - will be complete unless there is a transparent public inspection of, and credible mechanical and fiscal accounting for, Diablo Canyon's two aging reactors (see our petition at www.solartopia.org).

The two central coast nukes are scheduled to shut by 2025, a fact that gives some policymakers a false sense of safety and a convenient cover to avoid thinking about the devastating possibility of an earthquake that would render a major population center uninhabitable and its agricultural economy barren. Why kick up a fuss if the problem's going away in five years?

Here's why: The same pattern of lethal neglect and deferred maintenance that made PG&E the proven culprit in murderous wildfires is being repeated at Diablo Canyon. But the nuclear reactor units are more than thirty years old. Diablo Unit One was long ago found to be seriously embrittled, which means its piping is almost certainly cracked due to age. Its list of deferred maintenance procedures is a by-now notorious PG&E trademark. Its waste management procedures are suspect. The site is surrounded by more than a dozen interlinked earthquake faults.

Can we really trust the operation of these immensely complex machines over the coming sixty months to a company we don't trust to safely deliver electricity in a light breeze?

We don't need to: the power Diablo generates can be made up for by truly renewable energy sources.

Now is the time--before PG&E's bankruptcy is resolved--for the governor, the California Public Utilities Commission, and other public authorities to conduct a transparent inspection of PG&E's nuclear facility at Diablo. A truthful appraisal of the reactors--what PG&E might claim as its biggest single asset--is impossible without a thorough inventory of the reactors' structural liabilities

Technically, such inspections are the bailiwick of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC is currently a captive agency, with three of its five commissioners appointed by Trump. They have advocated a drastic scale-back of on-site safety inspections, allowing the nation's 96 aging reactors to become progressively more dangerous to our population.

But PG&E's bankruptcy creates a condition outside the NRC's purview: the court must ensure that the aggrieved parties are given a full understanding of the financial value and risks of the assets at stake.

All US reactors, Diablo among them, lack private insurance. A federal fund to which providers contribute to cover their liability for catastrophic accidents contains less than $13 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to what even one such accident would cost.

And who will run these two hotly contested nukes after the bankruptcy settlement? Public ownership is being hailed as a possible, progressive solution. Does that mean We the People unwittingly assume liability for the incalculable health, ecological, and property damages if the San Andreas fault (or any other) reduces Diablo to radioactive rubble and sends an apocalyptic Chernobyl cloud through the central valley, down to Los Angeles, up to the Bay Area, and into Northern California, so recently reduced to ash by PG&E?

The high-stakes debate over what to do with what was once the world's largest electric utility has been suspiciously silent on Diablo's two 800-pound gorillas. So hear this scream: The question of ownership - private or public - cannot be answered without accounting for the structural safety and potential liabilities of the two decrepit megaliths at San Luis Obispo.

The governor, the CPUC, the courts, and the company must provide the public with a detailed, independent, and credible look at the innards of these two immense machines before any bankruptcy proceedings can conclude or any future for California's electric supply can be mapped out. Call them all now!!!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
californiaenvironmentextreme weathergavin newsomnuclear power

Powerful forces are quickly moving Pacific Gas & Electric toward a settlement on its hideously complex multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy case. Thankfully, Governor Gavin Newsom has put at least a temporary hold on a final agreement.

But in the interim, it must be brought to light that no squaring of PG&E's accounts--with the people of California, the utility's fire victims, the governor, the Public Utilities Commission, the banks, or the planet - will be complete unless there is a transparent public inspection of, and credible mechanical and fiscal accounting for, Diablo Canyon's two aging reactors (see our petition at www.solartopia.org).

The two central coast nukes are scheduled to shut by 2025, a fact that gives some policymakers a false sense of safety and a convenient cover to avoid thinking about the devastating possibility of an earthquake that would render a major population center uninhabitable and its agricultural economy barren. Why kick up a fuss if the problem's going away in five years?

Here's why: The same pattern of lethal neglect and deferred maintenance that made PG&E the proven culprit in murderous wildfires is being repeated at Diablo Canyon. But the nuclear reactor units are more than thirty years old. Diablo Unit One was long ago found to be seriously embrittled, which means its piping is almost certainly cracked due to age. Its list of deferred maintenance procedures is a by-now notorious PG&E trademark. Its waste management procedures are suspect. The site is surrounded by more than a dozen interlinked earthquake faults.

Can we really trust the operation of these immensely complex machines over the coming sixty months to a company we don't trust to safely deliver electricity in a light breeze?

We don't need to: the power Diablo generates can be made up for by truly renewable energy sources.

Now is the time--before PG&E's bankruptcy is resolved--for the governor, the California Public Utilities Commission, and other public authorities to conduct a transparent inspection of PG&E's nuclear facility at Diablo. A truthful appraisal of the reactors--what PG&E might claim as its biggest single asset--is impossible without a thorough inventory of the reactors' structural liabilities

Technically, such inspections are the bailiwick of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC is currently a captive agency, with three of its five commissioners appointed by Trump. They have advocated a drastic scale-back of on-site safety inspections, allowing the nation's 96 aging reactors to become progressively more dangerous to our population.

But PG&E's bankruptcy creates a condition outside the NRC's purview: the court must ensure that the aggrieved parties are given a full understanding of the financial value and risks of the assets at stake.

All US reactors, Diablo among them, lack private insurance. A federal fund to which providers contribute to cover their liability for catastrophic accidents contains less than $13 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to what even one such accident would cost.

And who will run these two hotly contested nukes after the bankruptcy settlement? Public ownership is being hailed as a possible, progressive solution. Does that mean We the People unwittingly assume liability for the incalculable health, ecological, and property damages if the San Andreas fault (or any other) reduces Diablo to radioactive rubble and sends an apocalyptic Chernobyl cloud through the central valley, down to Los Angeles, up to the Bay Area, and into Northern California, so recently reduced to ash by PG&E?

The high-stakes debate over what to do with what was once the world's largest electric utility has been suspiciously silent on Diablo's two 800-pound gorillas. So hear this scream: The question of ownership - private or public - cannot be answered without accounting for the structural safety and potential liabilities of the two decrepit megaliths at San Luis Obispo.

The governor, the CPUC, the courts, and the company must provide the public with a detailed, independent, and credible look at the innards of these two immense machines before any bankruptcy proceedings can conclude or any future for California's electric supply can be mapped out. Call them all now!!!

Powerful forces are quickly moving Pacific Gas & Electric toward a settlement on its hideously complex multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy case. Thankfully, Governor Gavin Newsom has put at least a temporary hold on a final agreement.

But in the interim, it must be brought to light that no squaring of PG&E's accounts--with the people of California, the utility's fire victims, the governor, the Public Utilities Commission, the banks, or the planet - will be complete unless there is a transparent public inspection of, and credible mechanical and fiscal accounting for, Diablo Canyon's two aging reactors (see our petition at www.solartopia.org).

The two central coast nukes are scheduled to shut by 2025, a fact that gives some policymakers a false sense of safety and a convenient cover to avoid thinking about the devastating possibility of an earthquake that would render a major population center uninhabitable and its agricultural economy barren. Why kick up a fuss if the problem's going away in five years?

Here's why: The same pattern of lethal neglect and deferred maintenance that made PG&E the proven culprit in murderous wildfires is being repeated at Diablo Canyon. But the nuclear reactor units are more than thirty years old. Diablo Unit One was long ago found to be seriously embrittled, which means its piping is almost certainly cracked due to age. Its list of deferred maintenance procedures is a by-now notorious PG&E trademark. Its waste management procedures are suspect. The site is surrounded by more than a dozen interlinked earthquake faults.

Can we really trust the operation of these immensely complex machines over the coming sixty months to a company we don't trust to safely deliver electricity in a light breeze?

We don't need to: the power Diablo generates can be made up for by truly renewable energy sources.

Now is the time--before PG&E's bankruptcy is resolved--for the governor, the California Public Utilities Commission, and other public authorities to conduct a transparent inspection of PG&E's nuclear facility at Diablo. A truthful appraisal of the reactors--what PG&E might claim as its biggest single asset--is impossible without a thorough inventory of the reactors' structural liabilities

Technically, such inspections are the bailiwick of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC is currently a captive agency, with three of its five commissioners appointed by Trump. They have advocated a drastic scale-back of on-site safety inspections, allowing the nation's 96 aging reactors to become progressively more dangerous to our population.

But PG&E's bankruptcy creates a condition outside the NRC's purview: the court must ensure that the aggrieved parties are given a full understanding of the financial value and risks of the assets at stake.

All US reactors, Diablo among them, lack private insurance. A federal fund to which providers contribute to cover their liability for catastrophic accidents contains less than $13 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to what even one such accident would cost.

And who will run these two hotly contested nukes after the bankruptcy settlement? Public ownership is being hailed as a possible, progressive solution. Does that mean We the People unwittingly assume liability for the incalculable health, ecological, and property damages if the San Andreas fault (or any other) reduces Diablo to radioactive rubble and sends an apocalyptic Chernobyl cloud through the central valley, down to Los Angeles, up to the Bay Area, and into Northern California, so recently reduced to ash by PG&E?

The high-stakes debate over what to do with what was once the world's largest electric utility has been suspiciously silent on Diablo's two 800-pound gorillas. So hear this scream: The question of ownership - private or public - cannot be answered without accounting for the structural safety and potential liabilities of the two decrepit megaliths at San Luis Obispo.

The governor, the CPUC, the courts, and the company must provide the public with a detailed, independent, and credible look at the innards of these two immense machines before any bankruptcy proceedings can conclude or any future for California's electric supply can be mapped out. Call them all now!!!

californiaenvironmentextreme weathergavin newsomnuclear power