

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

If love is indeed an indicator of true religion, then let us choose love. (Photo: Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
At the dividing line between the U.S. and Mexico, two very different visions of God meet. As an expat living in San Miguel de Allende, I hear both the rhetoric of the religious right that rails against immigration, and also the pleas of the Central American immigrants who claim faith as the backbone for their journey north.
I recently met San Miguel-based immigration lawyer Rebecca Eichler who counsels immigrants seeking asylum in the U.S. She reports that the immigrants' strong faith surfaces again and again when they explain why they want to continue heading towards the border. They resolutely believe God will protect them. One immigrant man, after being informed of the reality of the border situation between Mexico and the U.S., said "With God, there are no borders." Other immigration volunteers also report that while the immigrants understand the dire conditions they will face, "without exception, their motivation for continuing on is an unbending belief in God."
As the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation.
Eichler notes, it is "striking that the God of the migrants is so at odds with the God who blesses America." While much could be said about this profound statement, it would seem that "the God who blesses America," at least the one called upon by politicians in recent years, comes with many strings attached and a well-entrenched belief system designed to protect those who already possess the most. The underlying conviction of this God is that the poor and most vulnerable are only worthy of assistance if they stay far away from our own backyard. As soon as they begin to flee the violence and unrest in their home countries, they become unworthy criminals.
However, according to the Sunday school classes of my youth, it is our treatment of "the least of these" that is the gold standard by which our actions are be measured. For compassion isn't dependent upon the recipient's behavior, last I checked. It is dependent upon the condition of our hearts. True religion necessitates both compassion for those in need and a willingness to set aside our own comfort, preference, and agenda to assist those less fortunate. It means identifying the true nature of love and extending kindness to suffering beings - no matter where on the planet they reside, no matter their nationality, what they are fleeing, or what borders they cross. On this, all world religions seem to agree. Helping those in need is a core tenet of every major faith system around the globe.
A fellow American volunteer helping the immigrants expressed that while he fears for them and what they may encounter as they head north, he respects their self-determination and only knows that "in my moment with them I can treat them with dignity." Not only are these words a poignant example of serving as a bridge between divided populations, they are also an indicator of real love - giving something away freely with no strings attached.
One immigrant stated, "We plan to get in line at the border... hopefully, the American president will find it in his heart to let us in." Although I am skeptical of the immigrant's hope for a change of heart in President Trump, surely a country of such great wealth can work towards compassionate solutions for the world's poor who are congregating at its doorstep. After all, the Statue of Liberty herself says, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...I lift my lamp beside the golden door."
Religious views may continue to create more divides than they heal. But as the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation. If love is indeed an indicator of true religion, then let us choose love.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At the dividing line between the U.S. and Mexico, two very different visions of God meet. As an expat living in San Miguel de Allende, I hear both the rhetoric of the religious right that rails against immigration, and also the pleas of the Central American immigrants who claim faith as the backbone for their journey north.
I recently met San Miguel-based immigration lawyer Rebecca Eichler who counsels immigrants seeking asylum in the U.S. She reports that the immigrants' strong faith surfaces again and again when they explain why they want to continue heading towards the border. They resolutely believe God will protect them. One immigrant man, after being informed of the reality of the border situation between Mexico and the U.S., said "With God, there are no borders." Other immigration volunteers also report that while the immigrants understand the dire conditions they will face, "without exception, their motivation for continuing on is an unbending belief in God."
As the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation.
Eichler notes, it is "striking that the God of the migrants is so at odds with the God who blesses America." While much could be said about this profound statement, it would seem that "the God who blesses America," at least the one called upon by politicians in recent years, comes with many strings attached and a well-entrenched belief system designed to protect those who already possess the most. The underlying conviction of this God is that the poor and most vulnerable are only worthy of assistance if they stay far away from our own backyard. As soon as they begin to flee the violence and unrest in their home countries, they become unworthy criminals.
However, according to the Sunday school classes of my youth, it is our treatment of "the least of these" that is the gold standard by which our actions are be measured. For compassion isn't dependent upon the recipient's behavior, last I checked. It is dependent upon the condition of our hearts. True religion necessitates both compassion for those in need and a willingness to set aside our own comfort, preference, and agenda to assist those less fortunate. It means identifying the true nature of love and extending kindness to suffering beings - no matter where on the planet they reside, no matter their nationality, what they are fleeing, or what borders they cross. On this, all world religions seem to agree. Helping those in need is a core tenet of every major faith system around the globe.
A fellow American volunteer helping the immigrants expressed that while he fears for them and what they may encounter as they head north, he respects their self-determination and only knows that "in my moment with them I can treat them with dignity." Not only are these words a poignant example of serving as a bridge between divided populations, they are also an indicator of real love - giving something away freely with no strings attached.
One immigrant stated, "We plan to get in line at the border... hopefully, the American president will find it in his heart to let us in." Although I am skeptical of the immigrant's hope for a change of heart in President Trump, surely a country of such great wealth can work towards compassionate solutions for the world's poor who are congregating at its doorstep. After all, the Statue of Liberty herself says, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...I lift my lamp beside the golden door."
Religious views may continue to create more divides than they heal. But as the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation. If love is indeed an indicator of true religion, then let us choose love.
At the dividing line between the U.S. and Mexico, two very different visions of God meet. As an expat living in San Miguel de Allende, I hear both the rhetoric of the religious right that rails against immigration, and also the pleas of the Central American immigrants who claim faith as the backbone for their journey north.
I recently met San Miguel-based immigration lawyer Rebecca Eichler who counsels immigrants seeking asylum in the U.S. She reports that the immigrants' strong faith surfaces again and again when they explain why they want to continue heading towards the border. They resolutely believe God will protect them. One immigrant man, after being informed of the reality of the border situation between Mexico and the U.S., said "With God, there are no borders." Other immigration volunteers also report that while the immigrants understand the dire conditions they will face, "without exception, their motivation for continuing on is an unbending belief in God."
As the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation.
Eichler notes, it is "striking that the God of the migrants is so at odds with the God who blesses America." While much could be said about this profound statement, it would seem that "the God who blesses America," at least the one called upon by politicians in recent years, comes with many strings attached and a well-entrenched belief system designed to protect those who already possess the most. The underlying conviction of this God is that the poor and most vulnerable are only worthy of assistance if they stay far away from our own backyard. As soon as they begin to flee the violence and unrest in their home countries, they become unworthy criminals.
However, according to the Sunday school classes of my youth, it is our treatment of "the least of these" that is the gold standard by which our actions are be measured. For compassion isn't dependent upon the recipient's behavior, last I checked. It is dependent upon the condition of our hearts. True religion necessitates both compassion for those in need and a willingness to set aside our own comfort, preference, and agenda to assist those less fortunate. It means identifying the true nature of love and extending kindness to suffering beings - no matter where on the planet they reside, no matter their nationality, what they are fleeing, or what borders they cross. On this, all world religions seem to agree. Helping those in need is a core tenet of every major faith system around the globe.
A fellow American volunteer helping the immigrants expressed that while he fears for them and what they may encounter as they head north, he respects their self-determination and only knows that "in my moment with them I can treat them with dignity." Not only are these words a poignant example of serving as a bridge between divided populations, they are also an indicator of real love - giving something away freely with no strings attached.
One immigrant stated, "We plan to get in line at the border... hopefully, the American president will find it in his heart to let us in." Although I am skeptical of the immigrant's hope for a change of heart in President Trump, surely a country of such great wealth can work towards compassionate solutions for the world's poor who are congregating at its doorstep. After all, the Statue of Liberty herself says, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...I lift my lamp beside the golden door."
Religious views may continue to create more divides than they heal. But as the conditions at the border continue to deteriorate, if the United States fails to act with benevolence, then it will have failed morally as a nation. If love is indeed an indicator of true religion, then let us choose love.