A recent study conducted by Australian climate experts has forecasted that rapidly warming global temperatures could cause human civilization to collapse as early as 2050. (Photo: GRIDArendal)
Trump's War on Science Is Grounds to Impeach
There are fresh signs that the Trump Administration intends to actively interfere in research by federal scientists
Since the earliest days of the Trump Administration, we've heard how Trump and his allies may have covered up evidence and obstructed investigations into Russiagate and other improprieties. Unsurprisingly, this has led to calls for the President's impeachment.
But there are other, more serious forms of obstruction that haven't generated anywhere near as much attention, despite potentially catastrophic consequences for the country and the world. And the most dangerous of these has been the Trump administration's near-constant war on science.
Trump and his administration are slashing common-sense regulations and censoring science to enrich their fossil fuel industry backers, exposing the country and the whole world to potentially catastrophic consequences. They are literally willing to endanger human lives and the very future of humanity for corporate profit.
A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, "Science under Siege at the Department of the Interior," documents how the Trump team has set out to obfuscate the findings of scientists through the use of censorship and distortion. And just this month, the State Department blocked a State Department official from testifying to Congress on the "possibly catastrophic" security impacts of climate change, even as an Australian study warned that civilization itself could be under dire threat by 2050.
Recently, the Department of Energy began referring to natural gas as "freedom gas," which sounds like something straight out of satire site The Onion. Unintentional humor aside, this choice of terminology resembles the calculated debasement of language by totalitarian states.
If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?
Last November, when a report by government scientists contradicted Trump's position and showed that the United States will suffer devastating consequences from climate change, the president simply declared that reality was irrelevant. "I don't believe it" was his response.
Now there are fresh signs that the Trump Administration intends to actively interfere in research by federal scientists. The New York Times reports that scientists who prepare the National Climate Assessment will now be instructed not to include the worst-case scenarios of climate change in their reports, so the full extent of potential impacts will be hidden from readers. They will also be asked to project their model results through 2040 instead of the end of the century, masking some of the most dire effects of climate change.
The administration is also reportedly setting up a "review panel" to publicly scrutinize the conclusions of the National Climate Assessment. Given the administration's track record, it wouldn't be surprising if the "review panel" is stacked with industry hacks or scientific outcasts like William Happer--Trump's reported choice for chair, who has likened what he termed the "demonization" of carbon emissions to the Holocaust.
Governments that respect democracy, transparency and truth don't systematically obstruct scientific research and harass scientists. Nor do they resort to crude propagandistic terms like "freedom gas" to mask the truth about their agenda.
This is obstruction and collusion of the worst and highest order. If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Since the earliest days of the Trump Administration, we've heard how Trump and his allies may have covered up evidence and obstructed investigations into Russiagate and other improprieties. Unsurprisingly, this has led to calls for the President's impeachment.
But there are other, more serious forms of obstruction that haven't generated anywhere near as much attention, despite potentially catastrophic consequences for the country and the world. And the most dangerous of these has been the Trump administration's near-constant war on science.
Trump and his administration are slashing common-sense regulations and censoring science to enrich their fossil fuel industry backers, exposing the country and the whole world to potentially catastrophic consequences. They are literally willing to endanger human lives and the very future of humanity for corporate profit.
A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, "Science under Siege at the Department of the Interior," documents how the Trump team has set out to obfuscate the findings of scientists through the use of censorship and distortion. And just this month, the State Department blocked a State Department official from testifying to Congress on the "possibly catastrophic" security impacts of climate change, even as an Australian study warned that civilization itself could be under dire threat by 2050.
Recently, the Department of Energy began referring to natural gas as "freedom gas," which sounds like something straight out of satire site The Onion. Unintentional humor aside, this choice of terminology resembles the calculated debasement of language by totalitarian states.
If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?
Last November, when a report by government scientists contradicted Trump's position and showed that the United States will suffer devastating consequences from climate change, the president simply declared that reality was irrelevant. "I don't believe it" was his response.
Now there are fresh signs that the Trump Administration intends to actively interfere in research by federal scientists. The New York Times reports that scientists who prepare the National Climate Assessment will now be instructed not to include the worst-case scenarios of climate change in their reports, so the full extent of potential impacts will be hidden from readers. They will also be asked to project their model results through 2040 instead of the end of the century, masking some of the most dire effects of climate change.
The administration is also reportedly setting up a "review panel" to publicly scrutinize the conclusions of the National Climate Assessment. Given the administration's track record, it wouldn't be surprising if the "review panel" is stacked with industry hacks or scientific outcasts like William Happer--Trump's reported choice for chair, who has likened what he termed the "demonization" of carbon emissions to the Holocaust.
Governments that respect democracy, transparency and truth don't systematically obstruct scientific research and harass scientists. Nor do they resort to crude propagandistic terms like "freedom gas" to mask the truth about their agenda.
This is obstruction and collusion of the worst and highest order. If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?
Since the earliest days of the Trump Administration, we've heard how Trump and his allies may have covered up evidence and obstructed investigations into Russiagate and other improprieties. Unsurprisingly, this has led to calls for the President's impeachment.
But there are other, more serious forms of obstruction that haven't generated anywhere near as much attention, despite potentially catastrophic consequences for the country and the world. And the most dangerous of these has been the Trump administration's near-constant war on science.
Trump and his administration are slashing common-sense regulations and censoring science to enrich their fossil fuel industry backers, exposing the country and the whole world to potentially catastrophic consequences. They are literally willing to endanger human lives and the very future of humanity for corporate profit.
A recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, "Science under Siege at the Department of the Interior," documents how the Trump team has set out to obfuscate the findings of scientists through the use of censorship and distortion. And just this month, the State Department blocked a State Department official from testifying to Congress on the "possibly catastrophic" security impacts of climate change, even as an Australian study warned that civilization itself could be under dire threat by 2050.
Recently, the Department of Energy began referring to natural gas as "freedom gas," which sounds like something straight out of satire site The Onion. Unintentional humor aside, this choice of terminology resembles the calculated debasement of language by totalitarian states.
If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?
Last November, when a report by government scientists contradicted Trump's position and showed that the United States will suffer devastating consequences from climate change, the president simply declared that reality was irrelevant. "I don't believe it" was his response.
Now there are fresh signs that the Trump Administration intends to actively interfere in research by federal scientists. The New York Times reports that scientists who prepare the National Climate Assessment will now be instructed not to include the worst-case scenarios of climate change in their reports, so the full extent of potential impacts will be hidden from readers. They will also be asked to project their model results through 2040 instead of the end of the century, masking some of the most dire effects of climate change.
The administration is also reportedly setting up a "review panel" to publicly scrutinize the conclusions of the National Climate Assessment. Given the administration's track record, it wouldn't be surprising if the "review panel" is stacked with industry hacks or scientific outcasts like William Happer--Trump's reported choice for chair, who has likened what he termed the "demonization" of carbon emissions to the Holocaust.
Governments that respect democracy, transparency and truth don't systematically obstruct scientific research and harass scientists. Nor do they resort to crude propagandistic terms like "freedom gas" to mask the truth about their agenda.
This is obstruction and collusion of the worst and highest order. If the comparatively venal case of Russiagate is grounds for impeachment, why isn't this?