SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Teachers rally in Chicago, 2012 (Rachel Docherty / Flickr)
Teacher Strikes Are About a Lot More Than Paychecks
Educators aren't just fighting for their own salaries. They're fighting to make life better for their entire communities.
Apr 12, 2018
Teachers across the United States are having a moment.
Educators are building on the momentum from West Virginia, where striking teachers won a 5 percent pay raise for state employees. Now the protests have spread to Arizona, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and the nation's capital.
The educators are winning broad public support, but some politicians aren't pleased.
Teachers are displaying a "thug mentality," Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin complained. They're asking for too much, like a "teenager wanting a better car," according to Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin.
Is it really "selfish and short-sighted," as Bevin put it, to demand a livable wage?
Teachers have long lived on austerity salaries while seeing their benefits, from pensions to health care, come under attack. They make less than other college graduates in all 50 states, and they're more likely than other workers to hold a second job.
But better pay isn't all that's compelling educators to act. Teachers are using the classroom to fight for their entire communities.
In Kentucky, teachers had to protest to save a critical social service program, which nearly fell victim to state tax cuts for the wealthy.
Politicians in Oklahoma spent years following the same path, slashing taxes for oil and gas companies while letting schools suffer. Thousands of Oklahomans have shared now-viral photos of the battered textbooks used by the state's students.
The problem isn't confined to a few bad actors. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 29 states provided less overall state funding per student in 2015 than they did before the 2008 recession. The result: school conditions so poor that they're forcing teachers to stand up and demand better.
These teachers are taking notes from Chicago. In 2012, when teachers there launched their first strike since 1987, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said it was a "strike by choice" that Chicago's kids didn't deserve. Teachers countered that the real choices harming the city's kids came from government officials and their corporate backers.
The union released a report pushing for proven reforms that would allow teachers to improve education while reducing inequality. And they proposed progressive taxation measures and closing corporate loopholes to help pay for the services their students needed most.
Chicago's teachers weren't just bargaining for their own paychecks and benefits. They were demanding justice for everyone in their classrooms -- and for the community as a whole.
Labor leaders elsewhere are following that model.
Detroit teachers made national headlines in 2016 with "sickouts" in protest of the poor conditions in public schools -- including black mold, rats, and lack of heat. The city teachers argued that suburban schools in the state would never be left to deteriorate in the same way.
In St. Paul, teachers included demands for racial equity in the classroom in their collective bargaining negotiations, which took place right as Super Bowl festivities kicked off there. How could the state's corporations fund the Super Bowl, teachers argued, yet not pay enough in taxes to fully fund school districts?
The teachers striking today are using the same arguments. The Oklahoma Education Association has proposed several revenue-raising options, like eliminating deductions for wealthy investors and increasing production taxes on oil and gas companies. All told their ideas would add more than $900 million to state coffers.
Just like the Chicago strike of 2012, the teacher protests taking place today aren't a "choice," but a response to one. Politicians chose to slash funding for public schools. Teachers are fighting that decision -- and for their communities.
The only selfish and short-sighted thing to do is continue with a broken status quo.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Negin Owliaei
Negin Owliaei is a co-editor and researcher at IPS's Inequality.org. Before joining IPS, she worked as a journalist and digital producer at Al Jazeera Media Network, where she covered social movements and the internet for the award-winning program The Stream.
Teachers across the United States are having a moment.
Educators are building on the momentum from West Virginia, where striking teachers won a 5 percent pay raise for state employees. Now the protests have spread to Arizona, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and the nation's capital.
The educators are winning broad public support, but some politicians aren't pleased.
Teachers are displaying a "thug mentality," Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin complained. They're asking for too much, like a "teenager wanting a better car," according to Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin.
Is it really "selfish and short-sighted," as Bevin put it, to demand a livable wage?
Teachers have long lived on austerity salaries while seeing their benefits, from pensions to health care, come under attack. They make less than other college graduates in all 50 states, and they're more likely than other workers to hold a second job.
But better pay isn't all that's compelling educators to act. Teachers are using the classroom to fight for their entire communities.
In Kentucky, teachers had to protest to save a critical social service program, which nearly fell victim to state tax cuts for the wealthy.
Politicians in Oklahoma spent years following the same path, slashing taxes for oil and gas companies while letting schools suffer. Thousands of Oklahomans have shared now-viral photos of the battered textbooks used by the state's students.
The problem isn't confined to a few bad actors. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 29 states provided less overall state funding per student in 2015 than they did before the 2008 recession. The result: school conditions so poor that they're forcing teachers to stand up and demand better.
These teachers are taking notes from Chicago. In 2012, when teachers there launched their first strike since 1987, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said it was a "strike by choice" that Chicago's kids didn't deserve. Teachers countered that the real choices harming the city's kids came from government officials and their corporate backers.
The union released a report pushing for proven reforms that would allow teachers to improve education while reducing inequality. And they proposed progressive taxation measures and closing corporate loopholes to help pay for the services their students needed most.
Chicago's teachers weren't just bargaining for their own paychecks and benefits. They were demanding justice for everyone in their classrooms -- and for the community as a whole.
Labor leaders elsewhere are following that model.
Detroit teachers made national headlines in 2016 with "sickouts" in protest of the poor conditions in public schools -- including black mold, rats, and lack of heat. The city teachers argued that suburban schools in the state would never be left to deteriorate in the same way.
In St. Paul, teachers included demands for racial equity in the classroom in their collective bargaining negotiations, which took place right as Super Bowl festivities kicked off there. How could the state's corporations fund the Super Bowl, teachers argued, yet not pay enough in taxes to fully fund school districts?
The teachers striking today are using the same arguments. The Oklahoma Education Association has proposed several revenue-raising options, like eliminating deductions for wealthy investors and increasing production taxes on oil and gas companies. All told their ideas would add more than $900 million to state coffers.
Just like the Chicago strike of 2012, the teacher protests taking place today aren't a "choice," but a response to one. Politicians chose to slash funding for public schools. Teachers are fighting that decision -- and for their communities.
The only selfish and short-sighted thing to do is continue with a broken status quo.
Negin Owliaei
Negin Owliaei is a co-editor and researcher at IPS's Inequality.org. Before joining IPS, she worked as a journalist and digital producer at Al Jazeera Media Network, where she covered social movements and the internet for the award-winning program The Stream.
Teachers across the United States are having a moment.
Educators are building on the momentum from West Virginia, where striking teachers won a 5 percent pay raise for state employees. Now the protests have spread to Arizona, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and the nation's capital.
The educators are winning broad public support, but some politicians aren't pleased.
Teachers are displaying a "thug mentality," Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin complained. They're asking for too much, like a "teenager wanting a better car," according to Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin.
Is it really "selfish and short-sighted," as Bevin put it, to demand a livable wage?
Teachers have long lived on austerity salaries while seeing their benefits, from pensions to health care, come under attack. They make less than other college graduates in all 50 states, and they're more likely than other workers to hold a second job.
But better pay isn't all that's compelling educators to act. Teachers are using the classroom to fight for their entire communities.
In Kentucky, teachers had to protest to save a critical social service program, which nearly fell victim to state tax cuts for the wealthy.
Politicians in Oklahoma spent years following the same path, slashing taxes for oil and gas companies while letting schools suffer. Thousands of Oklahomans have shared now-viral photos of the battered textbooks used by the state's students.
The problem isn't confined to a few bad actors. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 29 states provided less overall state funding per student in 2015 than they did before the 2008 recession. The result: school conditions so poor that they're forcing teachers to stand up and demand better.
These teachers are taking notes from Chicago. In 2012, when teachers there launched their first strike since 1987, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said it was a "strike by choice" that Chicago's kids didn't deserve. Teachers countered that the real choices harming the city's kids came from government officials and their corporate backers.
The union released a report pushing for proven reforms that would allow teachers to improve education while reducing inequality. And they proposed progressive taxation measures and closing corporate loopholes to help pay for the services their students needed most.
Chicago's teachers weren't just bargaining for their own paychecks and benefits. They were demanding justice for everyone in their classrooms -- and for the community as a whole.
Labor leaders elsewhere are following that model.
Detroit teachers made national headlines in 2016 with "sickouts" in protest of the poor conditions in public schools -- including black mold, rats, and lack of heat. The city teachers argued that suburban schools in the state would never be left to deteriorate in the same way.
In St. Paul, teachers included demands for racial equity in the classroom in their collective bargaining negotiations, which took place right as Super Bowl festivities kicked off there. How could the state's corporations fund the Super Bowl, teachers argued, yet not pay enough in taxes to fully fund school districts?
The teachers striking today are using the same arguments. The Oklahoma Education Association has proposed several revenue-raising options, like eliminating deductions for wealthy investors and increasing production taxes on oil and gas companies. All told their ideas would add more than $900 million to state coffers.
Just like the Chicago strike of 2012, the teacher protests taking place today aren't a "choice," but a response to one. Politicians chose to slash funding for public schools. Teachers are fighting that decision -- and for their communities.
The only selfish and short-sighted thing to do is continue with a broken status quo.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.