SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The president's apparent idea of what "winning" means... is a total loser. (Image: Shutterstock)
Are We Tired of 'Winning' Yet?
It's hard to see how anything the president would call a "win" would be good for his voters, or for any of us.
Jul 05, 2017
Can we stop pretending that leading Republicans care about anything beyond winning and power?
To be sure, there are some in the party who are guided by conservative "principles." House Speaker Paul Ryan said he's been "dreaming" of gutting Medicaid -- the program that provides health care to the poorest Americans -- since his college days.
No doubt that goal came from some ideological notion of cutting government programs in order to lower taxes on the wealthiest Americans, presumably because the poor are "lazy" or "undeserving."
Trump, for his part, just wants to win. Remember how he promised we'd all be "tired of winning" if he became president?
He didn't mean we'd "win" by having the best, most comprehensive health care system in the world. Or the best education system in the world. (If he cared one bit about education, he would've picked a secretary of education who had any qualifications to hold that job at all. But he didn't.)
Trump isn't interested in policy. Trump is interested in Trump.
At every step, his record proves he doesn't know or care much about the particulars of any health care bill Republicans in Congress write. He cares simply about getting it passed. He just wants to declare a "win" by repealing Obamacare. He wants to make the Democrats "lose."
If 22 million Americans lose their health care in the process, as the Congressional Budget Office predicts, so what? If people with cancer literally die when their health insurance is yanked out from under them, so what?
Case in point: After the House passed its version of the health care bill, Trump held an event in the Rose Garden for it. Normally such a ceremony is reserved for when a president signs a bill.
In this case, the Senate hadn't even considered it yet. Trump just wanted the optics of having a win.
Remember, this is the very same bill he later called "mean."
Trump gets a high from holding rallies where he speaks off the cuff to crowds that cheer and chant his name. It makes him feel loved and important. Plus, he doesn't have to prepare that much, always a plus.
Yet he's never learned that much about policy. He just promises that everything he does will be "tremendous" without giving any details, because he doesn't have any. If he gets a big cheer for something, like building a border wall, he'll keep it in his repertoire and ham it up even more.
No wonder he came to believe that solving the most difficult problems on earth -- North Korea, health care, terrorism -- would be easy.
There are two problems with Trump's win-at-all-cost ideology.
One is a practical problem for Republicans. Congressional Republicans have enough principles (if you count cutting programs for the poor as a principle) that it's near impossible to pass a health care bill that unites all of them.
The bigger problem is for Americans. We don't win when Republicans or Donald Trump crush the Democrats for the sake of looking like winners. We win when our leaders carefully analyze the nation's problems and craft legislation that solves them.
Republicans don't want to lose face by keeping Obamacare, or even by reforming its shortcomings, after promising to repeal it for years. Even though their proposals to replace it are unpopular and awful, they're willing to push them through out of fear their base -- or their donors -- will turn on them.
Republicans in Congress would rather millions of Americans lose health insurance than risk losing their own jobs. Apparently that's what "winning" looks like to them.
Americans won't win unless their leaders' goal is to help the American people instead of only helping themselves. Otherwise, Trump's right: I am tired of winning.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
Can we stop pretending that leading Republicans care about anything beyond winning and power?
To be sure, there are some in the party who are guided by conservative "principles." House Speaker Paul Ryan said he's been "dreaming" of gutting Medicaid -- the program that provides health care to the poorest Americans -- since his college days.
No doubt that goal came from some ideological notion of cutting government programs in order to lower taxes on the wealthiest Americans, presumably because the poor are "lazy" or "undeserving."
Trump, for his part, just wants to win. Remember how he promised we'd all be "tired of winning" if he became president?
He didn't mean we'd "win" by having the best, most comprehensive health care system in the world. Or the best education system in the world. (If he cared one bit about education, he would've picked a secretary of education who had any qualifications to hold that job at all. But he didn't.)
Trump isn't interested in policy. Trump is interested in Trump.
At every step, his record proves he doesn't know or care much about the particulars of any health care bill Republicans in Congress write. He cares simply about getting it passed. He just wants to declare a "win" by repealing Obamacare. He wants to make the Democrats "lose."
If 22 million Americans lose their health care in the process, as the Congressional Budget Office predicts, so what? If people with cancer literally die when their health insurance is yanked out from under them, so what?
Case in point: After the House passed its version of the health care bill, Trump held an event in the Rose Garden for it. Normally such a ceremony is reserved for when a president signs a bill.
In this case, the Senate hadn't even considered it yet. Trump just wanted the optics of having a win.
Remember, this is the very same bill he later called "mean."
Trump gets a high from holding rallies where he speaks off the cuff to crowds that cheer and chant his name. It makes him feel loved and important. Plus, he doesn't have to prepare that much, always a plus.
Yet he's never learned that much about policy. He just promises that everything he does will be "tremendous" without giving any details, because he doesn't have any. If he gets a big cheer for something, like building a border wall, he'll keep it in his repertoire and ham it up even more.
No wonder he came to believe that solving the most difficult problems on earth -- North Korea, health care, terrorism -- would be easy.
There are two problems with Trump's win-at-all-cost ideology.
One is a practical problem for Republicans. Congressional Republicans have enough principles (if you count cutting programs for the poor as a principle) that it's near impossible to pass a health care bill that unites all of them.
The bigger problem is for Americans. We don't win when Republicans or Donald Trump crush the Democrats for the sake of looking like winners. We win when our leaders carefully analyze the nation's problems and craft legislation that solves them.
Republicans don't want to lose face by keeping Obamacare, or even by reforming its shortcomings, after promising to repeal it for years. Even though their proposals to replace it are unpopular and awful, they're willing to push them through out of fear their base -- or their donors -- will turn on them.
Republicans in Congress would rather millions of Americans lose health insurance than risk losing their own jobs. Apparently that's what "winning" looks like to them.
Americans won't win unless their leaders' goal is to help the American people instead of only helping themselves. Otherwise, Trump's right: I am tired of winning.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
Can we stop pretending that leading Republicans care about anything beyond winning and power?
To be sure, there are some in the party who are guided by conservative "principles." House Speaker Paul Ryan said he's been "dreaming" of gutting Medicaid -- the program that provides health care to the poorest Americans -- since his college days.
No doubt that goal came from some ideological notion of cutting government programs in order to lower taxes on the wealthiest Americans, presumably because the poor are "lazy" or "undeserving."
Trump, for his part, just wants to win. Remember how he promised we'd all be "tired of winning" if he became president?
He didn't mean we'd "win" by having the best, most comprehensive health care system in the world. Or the best education system in the world. (If he cared one bit about education, he would've picked a secretary of education who had any qualifications to hold that job at all. But he didn't.)
Trump isn't interested in policy. Trump is interested in Trump.
At every step, his record proves he doesn't know or care much about the particulars of any health care bill Republicans in Congress write. He cares simply about getting it passed. He just wants to declare a "win" by repealing Obamacare. He wants to make the Democrats "lose."
If 22 million Americans lose their health care in the process, as the Congressional Budget Office predicts, so what? If people with cancer literally die when their health insurance is yanked out from under them, so what?
Case in point: After the House passed its version of the health care bill, Trump held an event in the Rose Garden for it. Normally such a ceremony is reserved for when a president signs a bill.
In this case, the Senate hadn't even considered it yet. Trump just wanted the optics of having a win.
Remember, this is the very same bill he later called "mean."
Trump gets a high from holding rallies where he speaks off the cuff to crowds that cheer and chant his name. It makes him feel loved and important. Plus, he doesn't have to prepare that much, always a plus.
Yet he's never learned that much about policy. He just promises that everything he does will be "tremendous" without giving any details, because he doesn't have any. If he gets a big cheer for something, like building a border wall, he'll keep it in his repertoire and ham it up even more.
No wonder he came to believe that solving the most difficult problems on earth -- North Korea, health care, terrorism -- would be easy.
There are two problems with Trump's win-at-all-cost ideology.
One is a practical problem for Republicans. Congressional Republicans have enough principles (if you count cutting programs for the poor as a principle) that it's near impossible to pass a health care bill that unites all of them.
The bigger problem is for Americans. We don't win when Republicans or Donald Trump crush the Democrats for the sake of looking like winners. We win when our leaders carefully analyze the nation's problems and craft legislation that solves them.
Republicans don't want to lose face by keeping Obamacare, or even by reforming its shortcomings, after promising to repeal it for years. Even though their proposals to replace it are unpopular and awful, they're willing to push them through out of fear their base -- or their donors -- will turn on them.
Republicans in Congress would rather millions of Americans lose health insurance than risk losing their own jobs. Apparently that's what "winning" looks like to them.
Americans won't win unless their leaders' goal is to help the American people instead of only helping themselves. Otherwise, Trump's right: I am tired of winning.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.