

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

'Senators face a fundamental choice,' writes Clement. 'Will they back a plan that imperils the health care of millions of hard-working Americans to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations?' (Photo: OverpassLightBrigade/flickr/cc)
Despite slight differences, the health-care legislation under consideration in the Senate retains the same sickening goal of its House counterpart: cutting taxes for millionaires, billionaires and big corporations at the expense of working families. These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few.
Twenty-two million people would lose health coverage under the Senate plan, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The savings would pay for tax cuts of $570 billion, mostly for high-income individuals and big health care companies. Both the Senate and House bills are meant to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), which extended health coverage to 20 million previously uninsured Americans.
"These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few."
The Senate bill slashes Medicaid by $772 billion over 10 years. In 2026, 15 million fewer Americans would be covered--mostly people with disabilities, kids from working families, and the elderly poor.
Medicaid is central to America's health care system. It pays for half the nation's births and nearly two-thirds of all nursing home care.
The Senate plan also punishes patients by reducing subsidies to help them buy private insurance. For example, the average monthly premium for a 64-old making $56,800 a year will go up by up to $13,700 compared to what they will pay under the Affordable Care Act. Such price hikes will put health-care coverage out of reach for 7 million. Especially hard hit will be older Americans living in rural areas.
While those who are most vulnerable lose health coverage, the wealthy and corporations reap huge tax savings. Millionaires would get a tax break averaging $50,000 a year. Each of the 400 richest families in America would receive an average annual tax cut of $7 million.
Health care corporations share in the tax-cut spoils too. Insurers will get $145 billion over 10 years--as well as a change in tax rules to let them overpay their top executives at taxpayer expense. Prescription drug companies will get $26 billion in tax cuts over the next decade.
Health insurers and pharmaceutical firms don't need tax cuts. Profits of the eight biggest health insurance companies jumped by a third over a recent four-year span, to more than $25 billion. Last year the top ten drug companies had combined earnings of over $83 billion.
Drug company profits keep getting bigger because drug companies keep price gouging. Over the past 10 years, drug prices have grown eight times faster than the general rate of inflation. Drug companies also stash hundreds of billions of dollars in profits offshore to dodge U.S. taxes.
Rich people never have to worry about losing their health care. They also benefit from a tax code that favors wealth over work: investment income in the form of dividends and capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than a lot of wage and salary income. The ACA addresses some of that injustice by placing a small tax on investment income for people making over $250,000 a year, using the revenue to expand health-care coverage to millions of lower-income Americans.
The Senate bill would reverse this advance, handing the wealthy a tax cut of over $170 billion over 10 years while undermining health care for working families. The Senate plan would also weaken Medicare by repealing an extra payroll tax on employees making over a quarter million dollars a year. This surtax has strengthened the Medicare hospital fund--eliminating it will shorten by two years its ability to pay full benefits. But the wealthy will get a $59 billion tax cut.
Senators face a fundamental choice. Will they back a plan that imperils the health care of millions of hard-working Americans to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations? Or will they reject this assault not only on our nation's health care but on its core values of fairness, compassion and common sense?
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Despite slight differences, the health-care legislation under consideration in the Senate retains the same sickening goal of its House counterpart: cutting taxes for millionaires, billionaires and big corporations at the expense of working families. These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few.
Twenty-two million people would lose health coverage under the Senate plan, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The savings would pay for tax cuts of $570 billion, mostly for high-income individuals and big health care companies. Both the Senate and House bills are meant to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), which extended health coverage to 20 million previously uninsured Americans.
"These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few."
The Senate bill slashes Medicaid by $772 billion over 10 years. In 2026, 15 million fewer Americans would be covered--mostly people with disabilities, kids from working families, and the elderly poor.
Medicaid is central to America's health care system. It pays for half the nation's births and nearly two-thirds of all nursing home care.
The Senate plan also punishes patients by reducing subsidies to help them buy private insurance. For example, the average monthly premium for a 64-old making $56,800 a year will go up by up to $13,700 compared to what they will pay under the Affordable Care Act. Such price hikes will put health-care coverage out of reach for 7 million. Especially hard hit will be older Americans living in rural areas.
While those who are most vulnerable lose health coverage, the wealthy and corporations reap huge tax savings. Millionaires would get a tax break averaging $50,000 a year. Each of the 400 richest families in America would receive an average annual tax cut of $7 million.
Health care corporations share in the tax-cut spoils too. Insurers will get $145 billion over 10 years--as well as a change in tax rules to let them overpay their top executives at taxpayer expense. Prescription drug companies will get $26 billion in tax cuts over the next decade.
Health insurers and pharmaceutical firms don't need tax cuts. Profits of the eight biggest health insurance companies jumped by a third over a recent four-year span, to more than $25 billion. Last year the top ten drug companies had combined earnings of over $83 billion.
Drug company profits keep getting bigger because drug companies keep price gouging. Over the past 10 years, drug prices have grown eight times faster than the general rate of inflation. Drug companies also stash hundreds of billions of dollars in profits offshore to dodge U.S. taxes.
Rich people never have to worry about losing their health care. They also benefit from a tax code that favors wealth over work: investment income in the form of dividends and capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than a lot of wage and salary income. The ACA addresses some of that injustice by placing a small tax on investment income for people making over $250,000 a year, using the revenue to expand health-care coverage to millions of lower-income Americans.
The Senate bill would reverse this advance, handing the wealthy a tax cut of over $170 billion over 10 years while undermining health care for working families. The Senate plan would also weaken Medicare by repealing an extra payroll tax on employees making over a quarter million dollars a year. This surtax has strengthened the Medicare hospital fund--eliminating it will shorten by two years its ability to pay full benefits. But the wealthy will get a $59 billion tax cut.
Senators face a fundamental choice. Will they back a plan that imperils the health care of millions of hard-working Americans to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations? Or will they reject this assault not only on our nation's health care but on its core values of fairness, compassion and common sense?
Despite slight differences, the health-care legislation under consideration in the Senate retains the same sickening goal of its House counterpart: cutting taxes for millionaires, billionaires and big corporations at the expense of working families. These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few.
Twenty-two million people would lose health coverage under the Senate plan, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The savings would pay for tax cuts of $570 billion, mostly for high-income individuals and big health care companies. Both the Senate and House bills are meant to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), which extended health coverage to 20 million previously uninsured Americans.
"These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families, they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few."
The Senate bill slashes Medicaid by $772 billion over 10 years. In 2026, 15 million fewer Americans would be covered--mostly people with disabilities, kids from working families, and the elderly poor.
Medicaid is central to America's health care system. It pays for half the nation's births and nearly two-thirds of all nursing home care.
The Senate plan also punishes patients by reducing subsidies to help them buy private insurance. For example, the average monthly premium for a 64-old making $56,800 a year will go up by up to $13,700 compared to what they will pay under the Affordable Care Act. Such price hikes will put health-care coverage out of reach for 7 million. Especially hard hit will be older Americans living in rural areas.
While those who are most vulnerable lose health coverage, the wealthy and corporations reap huge tax savings. Millionaires would get a tax break averaging $50,000 a year. Each of the 400 richest families in America would receive an average annual tax cut of $7 million.
Health care corporations share in the tax-cut spoils too. Insurers will get $145 billion over 10 years--as well as a change in tax rules to let them overpay their top executives at taxpayer expense. Prescription drug companies will get $26 billion in tax cuts over the next decade.
Health insurers and pharmaceutical firms don't need tax cuts. Profits of the eight biggest health insurance companies jumped by a third over a recent four-year span, to more than $25 billion. Last year the top ten drug companies had combined earnings of over $83 billion.
Drug company profits keep getting bigger because drug companies keep price gouging. Over the past 10 years, drug prices have grown eight times faster than the general rate of inflation. Drug companies also stash hundreds of billions of dollars in profits offshore to dodge U.S. taxes.
Rich people never have to worry about losing their health care. They also benefit from a tax code that favors wealth over work: investment income in the form of dividends and capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than a lot of wage and salary income. The ACA addresses some of that injustice by placing a small tax on investment income for people making over $250,000 a year, using the revenue to expand health-care coverage to millions of lower-income Americans.
The Senate bill would reverse this advance, handing the wealthy a tax cut of over $170 billion over 10 years while undermining health care for working families. The Senate plan would also weaken Medicare by repealing an extra payroll tax on employees making over a quarter million dollars a year. This surtax has strengthened the Medicare hospital fund--eliminating it will shorten by two years its ability to pay full benefits. But the wealthy will get a $59 billion tax cut.
Senators face a fundamental choice. Will they back a plan that imperils the health care of millions of hard-working Americans to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations? Or will they reject this assault not only on our nation's health care but on its core values of fairness, compassion and common sense?