Trump's TANF Cut Would Hurt the Poorest Families, and States Might Make Them Worse
President Trump's proposed $2.2 billion cut to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in 2018 would reduce states' federal TANF funds by 10 to 18 percent (depending on whether a state receives TANF Contingency Funds), as the table below shows. Over the next decade, the TANF cut would total $22 billion.
President Trump's proposed $2.2 billion cut to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in 2018 would reduce states' federal TANF funds by 10 to 18 percent (depending on whether a state receives TANF Contingency Funds), as the table below shows. Over the next decade, the TANF cut would total $22 billion.
Moreover, states have great flexibility to spend TANF funds as they wish, and they might be pressured to use some of their reduced TANF funds to plug their budget holes. That's because the Trump budget proposes to cut some $2.5 trillion over the next decade across programs for low- and moderate-income people, including a range of important programs for which the states receive significant federal funds.
To understand the magnitude of the TANF cuts in 2018 alone, consider:
- The cuts would total more than the amount that all states combined spendon work programs.
- In 11 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on basic assistance.
- In 18 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on child care assistance.
With their flexibility under TANF, states could respond to the cuts in a number of ways. They could, for instance, cut all of their TANF-funded programs by an equal percentage, or they could target the cuts in one area such as basic assistance.
Several states face budget shortfalls, they often look first to core TANF activities, like basic assistance, for savings. In response to increased need and budget shortfalls caused by the Great Recession, several states made disproportionate cuts to cash assistance by tightening time limits, reducing benefits, or scaling back eligibility. Still, because many states already spend so little on basic assistance, they likely would also have to cut popular programs like child care, state earned income tax credit programs that support working families, and child welfare programs that provide services to some of the most vulnerable children.
Several states face budget shortfalls this year and are already making tough decisions about how to balance their budgets. Some are considering cutting TANF basic assistance programs. The President's proposals would make it harder for states to fulfill TANF's core purpose: to provide financial support for families in need and help parents find work.
Fourteen states already have ten or fewer families on TANF for every 100 families in poverty. The President's TANF cuts would force states to push more families off assistance and deeper into poverty.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
President Trump's proposed $2.2 billion cut to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in 2018 would reduce states' federal TANF funds by 10 to 18 percent (depending on whether a state receives TANF Contingency Funds), as the table below shows. Over the next decade, the TANF cut would total $22 billion.
Moreover, states have great flexibility to spend TANF funds as they wish, and they might be pressured to use some of their reduced TANF funds to plug their budget holes. That's because the Trump budget proposes to cut some $2.5 trillion over the next decade across programs for low- and moderate-income people, including a range of important programs for which the states receive significant federal funds.
To understand the magnitude of the TANF cuts in 2018 alone, consider:
- The cuts would total more than the amount that all states combined spendon work programs.
- In 11 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on basic assistance.
- In 18 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on child care assistance.
With their flexibility under TANF, states could respond to the cuts in a number of ways. They could, for instance, cut all of their TANF-funded programs by an equal percentage, or they could target the cuts in one area such as basic assistance.
Several states face budget shortfalls, they often look first to core TANF activities, like basic assistance, for savings. In response to increased need and budget shortfalls caused by the Great Recession, several states made disproportionate cuts to cash assistance by tightening time limits, reducing benefits, or scaling back eligibility. Still, because many states already spend so little on basic assistance, they likely would also have to cut popular programs like child care, state earned income tax credit programs that support working families, and child welfare programs that provide services to some of the most vulnerable children.
Several states face budget shortfalls this year and are already making tough decisions about how to balance their budgets. Some are considering cutting TANF basic assistance programs. The President's proposals would make it harder for states to fulfill TANF's core purpose: to provide financial support for families in need and help parents find work.
Fourteen states already have ten or fewer families on TANF for every 100 families in poverty. The President's TANF cuts would force states to push more families off assistance and deeper into poverty.
President Trump's proposed $2.2 billion cut to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in 2018 would reduce states' federal TANF funds by 10 to 18 percent (depending on whether a state receives TANF Contingency Funds), as the table below shows. Over the next decade, the TANF cut would total $22 billion.
Moreover, states have great flexibility to spend TANF funds as they wish, and they might be pressured to use some of their reduced TANF funds to plug their budget holes. That's because the Trump budget proposes to cut some $2.5 trillion over the next decade across programs for low- and moderate-income people, including a range of important programs for which the states receive significant federal funds.
To understand the magnitude of the TANF cuts in 2018 alone, consider:
- The cuts would total more than the amount that all states combined spendon work programs.
- In 11 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on basic assistance.
- In 18 states, the cuts would be more than half of what the states spend on child care assistance.
With their flexibility under TANF, states could respond to the cuts in a number of ways. They could, for instance, cut all of their TANF-funded programs by an equal percentage, or they could target the cuts in one area such as basic assistance.
Several states face budget shortfalls, they often look first to core TANF activities, like basic assistance, for savings. In response to increased need and budget shortfalls caused by the Great Recession, several states made disproportionate cuts to cash assistance by tightening time limits, reducing benefits, or scaling back eligibility. Still, because many states already spend so little on basic assistance, they likely would also have to cut popular programs like child care, state earned income tax credit programs that support working families, and child welfare programs that provide services to some of the most vulnerable children.
Several states face budget shortfalls this year and are already making tough decisions about how to balance their budgets. Some are considering cutting TANF basic assistance programs. The President's proposals would make it harder for states to fulfill TANF's core purpose: to provide financial support for families in need and help parents find work.
Fourteen states already have ten or fewer families on TANF for every 100 families in poverty. The President's TANF cuts would force states to push more families off assistance and deeper into poverty.