Close the Wall Street CEO Bonus Loophole
A taxpayer-funded system of twisted rewards is propping up the same reckless pay system that caused one crash – and could cause more.
Over nine million American families lost their homes in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and millions watched their retirement savings evaporate. Meanwhile, the Wall Street banks that caused the crash were doling out executive stock options that would generate huge windfalls once bailout funds had pushed up their stock prices.
Then, thanks to a perverse loophole in the tax code, the banks could write off the entire cost of these options and other bonuses, leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
The origin of this loophole is a President Bill Clinton reform in 1993. After campaigning against the abuses of excessive CEO pay, he pushed Congress to cap the deductibility of pay at $1 million. But he included a huge loophole for so-called "performance-based" pay.
So what did companies do? They kept salaries around $1 million and labeled the rest "pay for performance."
This loophole applies to all companies, but it has been particularly obscene and even dangerous when it comes to the financial industry. In the run-up to the crash, the loophole helped fuel the "take the money and run" CEO pay practices on Wall Street. In the eight years before their firms collapsed, executives at Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns cashed out a combined $2.4 billion in bonuses and stock, most of it fully deductible "performance based" pay.
After the economic meltdown, Wall Street bailout recipients such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, PNC Financial, and SunTrust lost the privilege of deducting lucrative executive pay and bonus plans from their corporate taxes. But these banks rushed to escape from public bailout pay controls, some by borrowing in the private market to pay back Uncle Sam.
As a result, Wall Street banks quickly returned to their profligate ways, doling out massive bonuses to top managers, while deducting the cost and leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
According to a new Institute for Policy Studies report I co-authored, the top 20 U.S. banks paid out more than $2 billion in performance bonuses to their top five executives over the past four years. These payouts occurred after these banks were out from under bailout limits on deducting executive compensation. The taxpayer subsidy for these payouts was more than $725 million, or an average annual tax subsidy for the banks of $1.7 million per executive.
Between 2012 and 2015, Wells Fargo faced $10.4 billion in misconduct penalties for deceptive lending and other "bankers gone wild" behavior. During these same years, CEO John Stumpf pocketed $155 million in fully deductible performance pay at a cost to taxpayers of $54 million.
Between 2012 and 2015, American Express CEO Kenneth I. Chenault raked in over $123 million. The taxpayer subsidy for this payout was over $43 million. During the same period, taxpayers subsidized over $22 million for CEO pay at Capital One Financial and $17 million at Goldman Sachs.
Without a public intervention, we're setting ourselves up for the next risk-infused crash, driven in part by short-term pay incentives. The Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation prohibited Wall Street bonuses that encourage reckless behavior. Regulators need to stop dragging their feet on implementing this part of the law.
Eliminating the tax loophole for "performance pay" would also help discourage these risky payouts. A bill introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate, the "Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act," would do just that.
This reform would also generate an estimated $5 billion a year in revenue that could pay for urgent needs, such as affordable higher education and repairing vital infrastructure.
Taxpayers should not have to subsidize massive CEO bonuses at any firm. But such subsidies are particularly troubling when they are propping up a pay system that continues to encourage the high-risk, short-termist behavior which caused one devastating national crisis -- and could cause more in the future.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Over nine million American families lost their homes in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and millions watched their retirement savings evaporate. Meanwhile, the Wall Street banks that caused the crash were doling out executive stock options that would generate huge windfalls once bailout funds had pushed up their stock prices.
Then, thanks to a perverse loophole in the tax code, the banks could write off the entire cost of these options and other bonuses, leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
The origin of this loophole is a President Bill Clinton reform in 1993. After campaigning against the abuses of excessive CEO pay, he pushed Congress to cap the deductibility of pay at $1 million. But he included a huge loophole for so-called "performance-based" pay.
So what did companies do? They kept salaries around $1 million and labeled the rest "pay for performance."
This loophole applies to all companies, but it has been particularly obscene and even dangerous when it comes to the financial industry. In the run-up to the crash, the loophole helped fuel the "take the money and run" CEO pay practices on Wall Street. In the eight years before their firms collapsed, executives at Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns cashed out a combined $2.4 billion in bonuses and stock, most of it fully deductible "performance based" pay.
After the economic meltdown, Wall Street bailout recipients such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, PNC Financial, and SunTrust lost the privilege of deducting lucrative executive pay and bonus plans from their corporate taxes. But these banks rushed to escape from public bailout pay controls, some by borrowing in the private market to pay back Uncle Sam.
As a result, Wall Street banks quickly returned to their profligate ways, doling out massive bonuses to top managers, while deducting the cost and leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
According to a new Institute for Policy Studies report I co-authored, the top 20 U.S. banks paid out more than $2 billion in performance bonuses to their top five executives over the past four years. These payouts occurred after these banks were out from under bailout limits on deducting executive compensation. The taxpayer subsidy for these payouts was more than $725 million, or an average annual tax subsidy for the banks of $1.7 million per executive.
Between 2012 and 2015, Wells Fargo faced $10.4 billion in misconduct penalties for deceptive lending and other "bankers gone wild" behavior. During these same years, CEO John Stumpf pocketed $155 million in fully deductible performance pay at a cost to taxpayers of $54 million.
Between 2012 and 2015, American Express CEO Kenneth I. Chenault raked in over $123 million. The taxpayer subsidy for this payout was over $43 million. During the same period, taxpayers subsidized over $22 million for CEO pay at Capital One Financial and $17 million at Goldman Sachs.
Without a public intervention, we're setting ourselves up for the next risk-infused crash, driven in part by short-term pay incentives. The Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation prohibited Wall Street bonuses that encourage reckless behavior. Regulators need to stop dragging their feet on implementing this part of the law.
Eliminating the tax loophole for "performance pay" would also help discourage these risky payouts. A bill introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate, the "Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act," would do just that.
This reform would also generate an estimated $5 billion a year in revenue that could pay for urgent needs, such as affordable higher education and repairing vital infrastructure.
Taxpayers should not have to subsidize massive CEO bonuses at any firm. But such subsidies are particularly troubling when they are propping up a pay system that continues to encourage the high-risk, short-termist behavior which caused one devastating national crisis -- and could cause more in the future.
Over nine million American families lost their homes in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and millions watched their retirement savings evaporate. Meanwhile, the Wall Street banks that caused the crash were doling out executive stock options that would generate huge windfalls once bailout funds had pushed up their stock prices.
Then, thanks to a perverse loophole in the tax code, the banks could write off the entire cost of these options and other bonuses, leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
The origin of this loophole is a President Bill Clinton reform in 1993. After campaigning against the abuses of excessive CEO pay, he pushed Congress to cap the deductibility of pay at $1 million. But he included a huge loophole for so-called "performance-based" pay.
So what did companies do? They kept salaries around $1 million and labeled the rest "pay for performance."
This loophole applies to all companies, but it has been particularly obscene and even dangerous when it comes to the financial industry. In the run-up to the crash, the loophole helped fuel the "take the money and run" CEO pay practices on Wall Street. In the eight years before their firms collapsed, executives at Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns cashed out a combined $2.4 billion in bonuses and stock, most of it fully deductible "performance based" pay.
After the economic meltdown, Wall Street bailout recipients such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, PNC Financial, and SunTrust lost the privilege of deducting lucrative executive pay and bonus plans from their corporate taxes. But these banks rushed to escape from public bailout pay controls, some by borrowing in the private market to pay back Uncle Sam.
As a result, Wall Street banks quickly returned to their profligate ways, doling out massive bonuses to top managers, while deducting the cost and leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference.
According to a new Institute for Policy Studies report I co-authored, the top 20 U.S. banks paid out more than $2 billion in performance bonuses to their top five executives over the past four years. These payouts occurred after these banks were out from under bailout limits on deducting executive compensation. The taxpayer subsidy for these payouts was more than $725 million, or an average annual tax subsidy for the banks of $1.7 million per executive.
Between 2012 and 2015, Wells Fargo faced $10.4 billion in misconduct penalties for deceptive lending and other "bankers gone wild" behavior. During these same years, CEO John Stumpf pocketed $155 million in fully deductible performance pay at a cost to taxpayers of $54 million.
Between 2012 and 2015, American Express CEO Kenneth I. Chenault raked in over $123 million. The taxpayer subsidy for this payout was over $43 million. During the same period, taxpayers subsidized over $22 million for CEO pay at Capital One Financial and $17 million at Goldman Sachs.
Without a public intervention, we're setting ourselves up for the next risk-infused crash, driven in part by short-term pay incentives. The Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation prohibited Wall Street bonuses that encourage reckless behavior. Regulators need to stop dragging their feet on implementing this part of the law.
Eliminating the tax loophole for "performance pay" would also help discourage these risky payouts. A bill introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate, the "Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act," would do just that.
This reform would also generate an estimated $5 billion a year in revenue that could pay for urgent needs, such as affordable higher education and repairing vital infrastructure.
Taxpayers should not have to subsidize massive CEO bonuses at any firm. But such subsidies are particularly troubling when they are propping up a pay system that continues to encourage the high-risk, short-termist behavior which caused one devastating national crisis -- and could cause more in the future.