

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Last night, the Republican leadership agreed to release their hostages: the need to raise the debt limit, keep the government operating and ensure that all Social Security benefits can continue to be paid in full and on time beyond 2016.
When hostage takers release their hostages, we are, of course, relieved that the hostages are no longer in harm's way, but this is nothing to celebrate. That the ransom isn't steeper is also not something to celebrate.
Among the ransom is a diversion of Social Security resources towards virtually nonexistent fraud. Those provisions will likely require workers with disabilities to wait longer to receive their earned benefits and may prevent some from receiving them completely. That is wrong.
The legislation, along with the ransom, has some good provisions. It ensures that Medicare beneficiaries will not experience drastically large premium increases. It also closes a relatively recent loophole that allows wealthier Americans to game the system by claiming extra benefits inconsistent with the program's goals.
Though some provisions are positive, Social Security legislation, as a matter of principle, should go through regular order in the light of day.
If that were done, Social Security would be expanded. As the overwhelming majority of Americans recognize, Social Security's one shortcoming is that its benefits are too low. Congress should follow the people's will by expanding those modest but vital benefits and restoring the program to a long-range actuarial balance by requiring the wealthiest among us to pay their fair share.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last night, the Republican leadership agreed to release their hostages: the need to raise the debt limit, keep the government operating and ensure that all Social Security benefits can continue to be paid in full and on time beyond 2016.
When hostage takers release their hostages, we are, of course, relieved that the hostages are no longer in harm's way, but this is nothing to celebrate. That the ransom isn't steeper is also not something to celebrate.
Among the ransom is a diversion of Social Security resources towards virtually nonexistent fraud. Those provisions will likely require workers with disabilities to wait longer to receive their earned benefits and may prevent some from receiving them completely. That is wrong.
The legislation, along with the ransom, has some good provisions. It ensures that Medicare beneficiaries will not experience drastically large premium increases. It also closes a relatively recent loophole that allows wealthier Americans to game the system by claiming extra benefits inconsistent with the program's goals.
Though some provisions are positive, Social Security legislation, as a matter of principle, should go through regular order in the light of day.
If that were done, Social Security would be expanded. As the overwhelming majority of Americans recognize, Social Security's one shortcoming is that its benefits are too low. Congress should follow the people's will by expanding those modest but vital benefits and restoring the program to a long-range actuarial balance by requiring the wealthiest among us to pay their fair share.
Last night, the Republican leadership agreed to release their hostages: the need to raise the debt limit, keep the government operating and ensure that all Social Security benefits can continue to be paid in full and on time beyond 2016.
When hostage takers release their hostages, we are, of course, relieved that the hostages are no longer in harm's way, but this is nothing to celebrate. That the ransom isn't steeper is also not something to celebrate.
Among the ransom is a diversion of Social Security resources towards virtually nonexistent fraud. Those provisions will likely require workers with disabilities to wait longer to receive their earned benefits and may prevent some from receiving them completely. That is wrong.
The legislation, along with the ransom, has some good provisions. It ensures that Medicare beneficiaries will not experience drastically large premium increases. It also closes a relatively recent loophole that allows wealthier Americans to game the system by claiming extra benefits inconsistent with the program's goals.
Though some provisions are positive, Social Security legislation, as a matter of principle, should go through regular order in the light of day.
If that were done, Social Security would be expanded. As the overwhelming majority of Americans recognize, Social Security's one shortcoming is that its benefits are too low. Congress should follow the people's will by expanding those modest but vital benefits and restoring the program to a long-range actuarial balance by requiring the wealthiest among us to pay their fair share.