SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'If somebody's struggling so much that they resort to crime, should we really punish them by denying them food?' (Image: Great Beyond/Flickr)
The Right To Eat (and Why Being Poor Isn't a Crime)
There's one group of people in this country who probably get less sympathy than anyone else: felons.
If you're a convicted felon, very few Americans care about your plight. Can't find a job or an apartment because of your record? Too bad, we tell them, you shouldn't have committed a crime.
Apr 09, 2015
There's one group of people in this country who probably get less sympathy than anyone else: felons.
If you're a convicted felon, very few Americans care about your plight. Can't find a job or an apartment because of your record? Too bad, we tell them, you shouldn't have committed a crime.
In addition to being denied jobs or housing, convicted felons lose some or all of their voting rights in every state except Maine and Vermont. Twelve states continue to deny felons voting rights even after they've served prison sentences and completed parole.
Most states deny drug felons eligibility for food stamps, too.
In some states, like Arizona, Florida, and Texas, the ban is across the board. Elsewhere, including in Colorado, New Jersey, and Wisconsin, drug felons can regain this right if they complete alcohol or drug treatment.
This boggles my mind.
If somebody's struggling so much that they resort to crime, should we really punish them by denying them food? They're still human beings, no matter what they've done in their lives.
Maybe they're dealing with an addiction or a mental health issue. As of 2009, about a third of felony arrests were for drug crimes.
Maybe they're trying to function in society as upstanding citizens after their incarceration. Maybe they're struggling to do so.
For former felons trying to lead an honest life -- but poor enough to qualify for food stamps -- wouldn't food assistance make it that much easier to get by without breaking the law again?
Wouldn't relieving them of the stress of affording food allow them to focus on other things -- like staying away from drugs, or working through the problems that led them to commit a crime in the first place?
Food stamps aren't a magic fix. You have to be desperately poor to qualify, and even then, Uncle Sam isn't exactly a generous benefactor. But they help. They take away stress and meet a need for people that don't live easy lives.
Society should do all it can to rehabilitate felons, rather than punishing them for the rest of their lives. No criminal record negates their right as human beings to eat.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
There's one group of people in this country who probably get less sympathy than anyone else: felons.
If you're a convicted felon, very few Americans care about your plight. Can't find a job or an apartment because of your record? Too bad, we tell them, you shouldn't have committed a crime.
In addition to being denied jobs or housing, convicted felons lose some or all of their voting rights in every state except Maine and Vermont. Twelve states continue to deny felons voting rights even after they've served prison sentences and completed parole.
Most states deny drug felons eligibility for food stamps, too.
In some states, like Arizona, Florida, and Texas, the ban is across the board. Elsewhere, including in Colorado, New Jersey, and Wisconsin, drug felons can regain this right if they complete alcohol or drug treatment.
This boggles my mind.
If somebody's struggling so much that they resort to crime, should we really punish them by denying them food? They're still human beings, no matter what they've done in their lives.
Maybe they're dealing with an addiction or a mental health issue. As of 2009, about a third of felony arrests were for drug crimes.
Maybe they're trying to function in society as upstanding citizens after their incarceration. Maybe they're struggling to do so.
For former felons trying to lead an honest life -- but poor enough to qualify for food stamps -- wouldn't food assistance make it that much easier to get by without breaking the law again?
Wouldn't relieving them of the stress of affording food allow them to focus on other things -- like staying away from drugs, or working through the problems that led them to commit a crime in the first place?
Food stamps aren't a magic fix. You have to be desperately poor to qualify, and even then, Uncle Sam isn't exactly a generous benefactor. But they help. They take away stress and meet a need for people that don't live easy lives.
Society should do all it can to rehabilitate felons, rather than punishing them for the rest of their lives. No criminal record negates their right as human beings to eat.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
There's one group of people in this country who probably get less sympathy than anyone else: felons.
If you're a convicted felon, very few Americans care about your plight. Can't find a job or an apartment because of your record? Too bad, we tell them, you shouldn't have committed a crime.
In addition to being denied jobs or housing, convicted felons lose some or all of their voting rights in every state except Maine and Vermont. Twelve states continue to deny felons voting rights even after they've served prison sentences and completed parole.
Most states deny drug felons eligibility for food stamps, too.
In some states, like Arizona, Florida, and Texas, the ban is across the board. Elsewhere, including in Colorado, New Jersey, and Wisconsin, drug felons can regain this right if they complete alcohol or drug treatment.
This boggles my mind.
If somebody's struggling so much that they resort to crime, should we really punish them by denying them food? They're still human beings, no matter what they've done in their lives.
Maybe they're dealing with an addiction or a mental health issue. As of 2009, about a third of felony arrests were for drug crimes.
Maybe they're trying to function in society as upstanding citizens after their incarceration. Maybe they're struggling to do so.
For former felons trying to lead an honest life -- but poor enough to qualify for food stamps -- wouldn't food assistance make it that much easier to get by without breaking the law again?
Wouldn't relieving them of the stress of affording food allow them to focus on other things -- like staying away from drugs, or working through the problems that led them to commit a crime in the first place?
Food stamps aren't a magic fix. You have to be desperately poor to qualify, and even then, Uncle Sam isn't exactly a generous benefactor. But they help. They take away stress and meet a need for people that don't live easy lives.
Society should do all it can to rehabilitate felons, rather than punishing them for the rest of their lives. No criminal record negates their right as human beings to eat.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.