SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The War on Leaks Has Gone Way Too Far When Journalists' Emails Are Under Surveillance
The US government’s demands for the private emails of WikiLeaks staffers is outrageous. Disliking Julian Assange is a disgraceful reason for anyone to stay silent
Jan 26, 2015
The outrageous legal attack on WikiLeaks and its staffers, who are exercising their First Amendment rights to publish classified information in the public interest--just like virtually every other major news organization in this country--is an attack on freedom of the press itself, and it's shocking that more people aren't raising their voices (and pens, and keyboards) in protest.
In the past four years, WikiLeaks has had their Twitter accounts secretly spied on, been forced to forfeit most of their funding after credit card companies unilaterally cut them off, had the FBI place an informant inside their news organization, watched their supporters hauled before a grand jury, and been the victim of the UK spy agency GCHQ hacking of their website and spying on their readers.
Now we've learned that, as The Guardian reported on Sunday, the Justice Department got a warrant in 2012 to seize the contents - plus the metadata on emails received, sent, drafted and deleted - of three WikiLeaks' staffers personal Gmail accounts, which was inexplicably kept secret from them for almost two and a half years.
The warrant for WikiLeaks staffers' email is likely connected to the grand jury the government convened in 2010 to investigate the WikiLeaks' publication of leaked State Department cables, along with the Afghan and Iraq war logs. As The Guardian reports:
The warrants were issued by a federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia - the same jurisdiction in which a grand jury was set up under the criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. The investigation was confirmed to be still active and ongoing as recently as May last year. [Emphasis mine.]
Most journalists and press freedom groups have been inexplicably quiet about the Justice Department's treatment of WikiLeaks and its staffers ever since, despite the fact that there has been a (justified) backlash against the rest of the Justice Department's attempt to subpoena reporters' phone call records and spy on their emails. But almost all of the tactics used against WikiLeaks by the Justice Department in their war on leakswere also used against mainstream news organizations.
Read the full article at The Guardian.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Guardian
Trevor Timm
Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and legal analyst who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He writes a weekly column for The Guardian and has also contributed to The Atlantic, Al Jazeera, Foreign Policy, Harvard Law and Policy Review, PBS MediaShift, and Politico.
The outrageous legal attack on WikiLeaks and its staffers, who are exercising their First Amendment rights to publish classified information in the public interest--just like virtually every other major news organization in this country--is an attack on freedom of the press itself, and it's shocking that more people aren't raising their voices (and pens, and keyboards) in protest.
In the past four years, WikiLeaks has had their Twitter accounts secretly spied on, been forced to forfeit most of their funding after credit card companies unilaterally cut them off, had the FBI place an informant inside their news organization, watched their supporters hauled before a grand jury, and been the victim of the UK spy agency GCHQ hacking of their website and spying on their readers.
Now we've learned that, as The Guardian reported on Sunday, the Justice Department got a warrant in 2012 to seize the contents - plus the metadata on emails received, sent, drafted and deleted - of three WikiLeaks' staffers personal Gmail accounts, which was inexplicably kept secret from them for almost two and a half years.
The warrant for WikiLeaks staffers' email is likely connected to the grand jury the government convened in 2010 to investigate the WikiLeaks' publication of leaked State Department cables, along with the Afghan and Iraq war logs. As The Guardian reports:
The warrants were issued by a federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia - the same jurisdiction in which a grand jury was set up under the criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. The investigation was confirmed to be still active and ongoing as recently as May last year. [Emphasis mine.]
Most journalists and press freedom groups have been inexplicably quiet about the Justice Department's treatment of WikiLeaks and its staffers ever since, despite the fact that there has been a (justified) backlash against the rest of the Justice Department's attempt to subpoena reporters' phone call records and spy on their emails. But almost all of the tactics used against WikiLeaks by the Justice Department in their war on leakswere also used against mainstream news organizations.
Read the full article at The Guardian.
Trevor Timm
Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and legal analyst who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He writes a weekly column for The Guardian and has also contributed to The Atlantic, Al Jazeera, Foreign Policy, Harvard Law and Policy Review, PBS MediaShift, and Politico.
The outrageous legal attack on WikiLeaks and its staffers, who are exercising their First Amendment rights to publish classified information in the public interest--just like virtually every other major news organization in this country--is an attack on freedom of the press itself, and it's shocking that more people aren't raising their voices (and pens, and keyboards) in protest.
In the past four years, WikiLeaks has had their Twitter accounts secretly spied on, been forced to forfeit most of their funding after credit card companies unilaterally cut them off, had the FBI place an informant inside their news organization, watched their supporters hauled before a grand jury, and been the victim of the UK spy agency GCHQ hacking of their website and spying on their readers.
Now we've learned that, as The Guardian reported on Sunday, the Justice Department got a warrant in 2012 to seize the contents - plus the metadata on emails received, sent, drafted and deleted - of three WikiLeaks' staffers personal Gmail accounts, which was inexplicably kept secret from them for almost two and a half years.
The warrant for WikiLeaks staffers' email is likely connected to the grand jury the government convened in 2010 to investigate the WikiLeaks' publication of leaked State Department cables, along with the Afghan and Iraq war logs. As The Guardian reports:
The warrants were issued by a federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia - the same jurisdiction in which a grand jury was set up under the criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. The investigation was confirmed to be still active and ongoing as recently as May last year. [Emphasis mine.]
Most journalists and press freedom groups have been inexplicably quiet about the Justice Department's treatment of WikiLeaks and its staffers ever since, despite the fact that there has been a (justified) backlash against the rest of the Justice Department's attempt to subpoena reporters' phone call records and spy on their emails. But almost all of the tactics used against WikiLeaks by the Justice Department in their war on leakswere also used against mainstream news organizations.
Read the full article at The Guardian.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.