

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It tells you something about what's laughingly called the public debate, when the most dovish voice on the questions of terrorism and war comes from a leader of the military industrial complex.
Jens Stoltenberg is secretary general of NATO. He hasn't appeared in the US media in connection with the attacks in France, but he was there in Paris for the unity rally this month, and he was interviewed on the BBC soon after that.
To the BBC World Service he could be heard saying radical things like individual people should be held responsible for criminal acts, not groups.
It tells you something about what's laughingly called the public debate, when the most dovish voice on the questions of terrorism and war comes from a leader of the military industrial complex.
Jens Stoltenberg is secretary general of NATO. He hasn't appeared in the US media in connection with the attacks in France, but he was there in Paris for the unity rally this month, and he was interviewed on the BBC soon after that.
To the BBC World Service he could be heard saying radical things like individual people should be held responsible for criminal acts, not groups.
Stoltenberg knows whereof he speaks. He was Prime Minister of Norway in 2011 when madman Anders Breivik killed 77 mostly teenagers in the deadliest attack in that country since World War II. Instead of acting "tough" and calling for new powers to wage war, Stoltenberg at that time, called on Norwegians to quote: "counter blind hate with argument and education" . His words from then got a new life on social media this January.
On the BBC speaking about the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the kosher market, the NATO chief said crazy dove-ish things, like, "we have to distinguish between open debates and acts of violence."
He even implied there was a role for courts. "Criminal acts have to be prosecuted with means of police and bringing those responsible to justice..."
Clearly he didn't get the memo about assassination drones.
When UN human rights chief Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland, declined to call 9-11 an act of war, and suggested we capture and prosecute instead of summarily execute those responsible, she lost her post and her voice in the US media almost at once.
That's what I thought would happen to Stoltenberg. There's just no visible place for controversial views like these in the great free press we keep hearing about.
Luckily for Stoltenberg, there is one way back into the US media's good graces . Soon after the Paris unity rally, the new NATO chief announced NATO's latest high-ticket boondoggle - an "ultra-rapid-reaction force, " called "spearhead" and in speech in Berlin he stressed the need for members of the US-led alliance to bump up investments in security forces austerity be damned. You need to invest more, amid challenges such as jihadist group Islamic State or the Ukraine crisis he said. You could almost hear the military contractors salivate.
That did it. Within days, I could find half a dozen stories quoting the NATO Chief talking about that.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It tells you something about what's laughingly called the public debate, when the most dovish voice on the questions of terrorism and war comes from a leader of the military industrial complex.
Jens Stoltenberg is secretary general of NATO. He hasn't appeared in the US media in connection with the attacks in France, but he was there in Paris for the unity rally this month, and he was interviewed on the BBC soon after that.
To the BBC World Service he could be heard saying radical things like individual people should be held responsible for criminal acts, not groups.
Stoltenberg knows whereof he speaks. He was Prime Minister of Norway in 2011 when madman Anders Breivik killed 77 mostly teenagers in the deadliest attack in that country since World War II. Instead of acting "tough" and calling for new powers to wage war, Stoltenberg at that time, called on Norwegians to quote: "counter blind hate with argument and education" . His words from then got a new life on social media this January.
On the BBC speaking about the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the kosher market, the NATO chief said crazy dove-ish things, like, "we have to distinguish between open debates and acts of violence."
He even implied there was a role for courts. "Criminal acts have to be prosecuted with means of police and bringing those responsible to justice..."
Clearly he didn't get the memo about assassination drones.
When UN human rights chief Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland, declined to call 9-11 an act of war, and suggested we capture and prosecute instead of summarily execute those responsible, she lost her post and her voice in the US media almost at once.
That's what I thought would happen to Stoltenberg. There's just no visible place for controversial views like these in the great free press we keep hearing about.
Luckily for Stoltenberg, there is one way back into the US media's good graces . Soon after the Paris unity rally, the new NATO chief announced NATO's latest high-ticket boondoggle - an "ultra-rapid-reaction force, " called "spearhead" and in speech in Berlin he stressed the need for members of the US-led alliance to bump up investments in security forces austerity be damned. You need to invest more, amid challenges such as jihadist group Islamic State or the Ukraine crisis he said. You could almost hear the military contractors salivate.
That did it. Within days, I could find half a dozen stories quoting the NATO Chief talking about that.
It tells you something about what's laughingly called the public debate, when the most dovish voice on the questions of terrorism and war comes from a leader of the military industrial complex.
Jens Stoltenberg is secretary general of NATO. He hasn't appeared in the US media in connection with the attacks in France, but he was there in Paris for the unity rally this month, and he was interviewed on the BBC soon after that.
To the BBC World Service he could be heard saying radical things like individual people should be held responsible for criminal acts, not groups.
Stoltenberg knows whereof he speaks. He was Prime Minister of Norway in 2011 when madman Anders Breivik killed 77 mostly teenagers in the deadliest attack in that country since World War II. Instead of acting "tough" and calling for new powers to wage war, Stoltenberg at that time, called on Norwegians to quote: "counter blind hate with argument and education" . His words from then got a new life on social media this January.
On the BBC speaking about the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the kosher market, the NATO chief said crazy dove-ish things, like, "we have to distinguish between open debates and acts of violence."
He even implied there was a role for courts. "Criminal acts have to be prosecuted with means of police and bringing those responsible to justice..."
Clearly he didn't get the memo about assassination drones.
When UN human rights chief Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland, declined to call 9-11 an act of war, and suggested we capture and prosecute instead of summarily execute those responsible, she lost her post and her voice in the US media almost at once.
That's what I thought would happen to Stoltenberg. There's just no visible place for controversial views like these in the great free press we keep hearing about.
Luckily for Stoltenberg, there is one way back into the US media's good graces . Soon after the Paris unity rally, the new NATO chief announced NATO's latest high-ticket boondoggle - an "ultra-rapid-reaction force, " called "spearhead" and in speech in Berlin he stressed the need for members of the US-led alliance to bump up investments in security forces austerity be damned. You need to invest more, amid challenges such as jihadist group Islamic State or the Ukraine crisis he said. You could almost hear the military contractors salivate.
That did it. Within days, I could find half a dozen stories quoting the NATO Chief talking about that.