US Financial Transactions Tax Would Bring Financial Markets into 21st Century
Representative Chris Van Hollen's proposal for a financial transactions tax, a key part of the new tax plan that he revealed this morning, is a move towards establishing a 21st century structure for financial markets. In the last four decades there has been an enormous reduction in the cost of financial transactions due to the development of computers and information technology. This has led to an explosion in trading volume.
Representative Chris Van Hollen's proposal for a financial transactions tax, a key part of the new tax plan that he revealed this morning, is a move towards establishing a 21st century structure for financial markets. In the last four decades there has been an enormous reduction in the cost of financial transactions due to the development of computers and information technology. This has led to an explosion in trading volume. Much of this trading volume serves no purpose from the standpoint of the productive economy, yet it generates enormous incomes for the financial industry.
Representative Van Hollen's proposal is a step to reduce this source of economic waste. As even the International Monetary Fund has recognized, the financial sector is a grossly under-taxed sector in the United States and other wealthy countries. So rather than 'picking winners and losers,' this tax would help even the playing field between the Wall Street and Main Street.
While it will be important to see the specifics of the proposal, even a modest tax on financial transactions can raise a substantial amount of money almost exclusively by eliminating waste in the financial industry. Many analysts have noted that the 0.1 percent fee on stock trades in the Van Hollen proposal will imply a small cost to the vast majority of middle income savers. However, their assessment generally fails to note the decline in trading volume that would be expected to result from a rise in trading costs.
Most research shows that the elasticity of trading volume to trading costs is close to one, which means that trading will decline in roughly the same proportion to the increase in trading costs. This means that if per-trade costs were to increase by 50 percent as a result of the proposed tax, then the typical 401(k) holder would reduce their number of trades by roughly 50 percent, leaving their total trading costs little changed. This means that virtually all of the cost of the tax free up resources for the productive sectors of the economy. In addition to reducing inequality, this should provide a boost to economic growth.
It is important that Representative Van Hollen and the rest of the Democratic leadership have shown the courage to raise this issue. It can have a substantial impact in making a stronger economy with more widely shared prosperity.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Representative Chris Van Hollen's proposal for a financial transactions tax, a key part of the new tax plan that he revealed this morning, is a move towards establishing a 21st century structure for financial markets. In the last four decades there has been an enormous reduction in the cost of financial transactions due to the development of computers and information technology. This has led to an explosion in trading volume. Much of this trading volume serves no purpose from the standpoint of the productive economy, yet it generates enormous incomes for the financial industry.
Representative Van Hollen's proposal is a step to reduce this source of economic waste. As even the International Monetary Fund has recognized, the financial sector is a grossly under-taxed sector in the United States and other wealthy countries. So rather than 'picking winners and losers,' this tax would help even the playing field between the Wall Street and Main Street.
While it will be important to see the specifics of the proposal, even a modest tax on financial transactions can raise a substantial amount of money almost exclusively by eliminating waste in the financial industry. Many analysts have noted that the 0.1 percent fee on stock trades in the Van Hollen proposal will imply a small cost to the vast majority of middle income savers. However, their assessment generally fails to note the decline in trading volume that would be expected to result from a rise in trading costs.
Most research shows that the elasticity of trading volume to trading costs is close to one, which means that trading will decline in roughly the same proportion to the increase in trading costs. This means that if per-trade costs were to increase by 50 percent as a result of the proposed tax, then the typical 401(k) holder would reduce their number of trades by roughly 50 percent, leaving their total trading costs little changed. This means that virtually all of the cost of the tax free up resources for the productive sectors of the economy. In addition to reducing inequality, this should provide a boost to economic growth.
It is important that Representative Van Hollen and the rest of the Democratic leadership have shown the courage to raise this issue. It can have a substantial impact in making a stronger economy with more widely shared prosperity.
Representative Chris Van Hollen's proposal for a financial transactions tax, a key part of the new tax plan that he revealed this morning, is a move towards establishing a 21st century structure for financial markets. In the last four decades there has been an enormous reduction in the cost of financial transactions due to the development of computers and information technology. This has led to an explosion in trading volume. Much of this trading volume serves no purpose from the standpoint of the productive economy, yet it generates enormous incomes for the financial industry.
Representative Van Hollen's proposal is a step to reduce this source of economic waste. As even the International Monetary Fund has recognized, the financial sector is a grossly under-taxed sector in the United States and other wealthy countries. So rather than 'picking winners and losers,' this tax would help even the playing field between the Wall Street and Main Street.
While it will be important to see the specifics of the proposal, even a modest tax on financial transactions can raise a substantial amount of money almost exclusively by eliminating waste in the financial industry. Many analysts have noted that the 0.1 percent fee on stock trades in the Van Hollen proposal will imply a small cost to the vast majority of middle income savers. However, their assessment generally fails to note the decline in trading volume that would be expected to result from a rise in trading costs.
Most research shows that the elasticity of trading volume to trading costs is close to one, which means that trading will decline in roughly the same proportion to the increase in trading costs. This means that if per-trade costs were to increase by 50 percent as a result of the proposed tax, then the typical 401(k) holder would reduce their number of trades by roughly 50 percent, leaving their total trading costs little changed. This means that virtually all of the cost of the tax free up resources for the productive sectors of the economy. In addition to reducing inequality, this should provide a boost to economic growth.
It is important that Representative Van Hollen and the rest of the Democratic leadership have shown the courage to raise this issue. It can have a substantial impact in making a stronger economy with more widely shared prosperity.