This so-called "partnership" is an insult to U.S. workers. And it's especially bad news for women. (Photo: SumofUs/flickr/cc)
Nov 27, 2014
President Barack Obama has insisted up and down that he's willing to work with the Republicans who are taking over the Senate.
He proved it during his recent visit to Beijing, where he urged world leaders to come to agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a longtime priority of soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
What's the TPP, you ask?
It's a giant trade agreement between the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations -- including Australia, Japan, and Malaysia, among others -- now being negotiated in secret.
Well, mostly in secret. Around 600 corporations and a few labor unions with stakes in the talks have seen a draft. Except for a few chapters released by WikiLeaks last year, Congress and the public have not.
But here's what we do know: This so-called "partnership" is an insult to U.S. workers. And it's especially bad news for women.
According to Doctors Without Borders, for example, the agreement's intellectual property clauses could cut off access to generic drugs for people living with HIV/AIDS -- who are increasingly women and kids.
And the Communications Workers of America union says the pact will make it easier for corporations to outsource majority-female jobs -- not only in low-wage workplaces such as call centers, but also higher-wage sectors like human resources.
So it's no surprise that women in Congress have been leading the opposition to the TPP for some time.
In the House, Democrats Rosa DeLauro and Louise Slaughter pointed out in a forceful Los Angeles Times op-ed that the agreement would force Americans to compete against workers from extremely low-wage countries. It would also, they argued, roll back environmental standards and U.S. laws that protect food and drug safety.
In the Senate, Democrat Elizabeth Warren has expressed worries that the secretive agreement could weaken financial regulations. She opposed the appointment of Michael Froman as the U.S. trade representative -- a job that has made him the chief arbiter of the treaty-making process -- because he flatly stated his opposition to more transparency in the negotiations.
And there's another little-known provision.
Under the proposed rules, businesses incorporated in TPP countries -- any of them -- would be guaranteed equal treatment with U.S. firms when bidding on government contracts.
That means our tax dollars could go to underwriting companies in countries like Brunei, which imprisons unmarried women for getting pregnant and allows the stoning of gays and lesbians.
I'm all for cooperation in government, and I do hope President Obama and Mitch McConnell can agree on some things -- like a higher minimum wage for instance.
But the Trans-Pacific Partnership? Sink it.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Martha Burk
Martha Burk is a political psychologist, women's issues expert, and director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women's Organizations (NCWO) and the author of the "Your Voice, Your Vote" (2020). Follow Martha on Twitter @MarthaBurk.
barack obamadoctors without borderselizabeth warrenlgbtqmalaysiamitch mcconnellpublic healthtpptradewikileakswomen
President Barack Obama has insisted up and down that he's willing to work with the Republicans who are taking over the Senate.
He proved it during his recent visit to Beijing, where he urged world leaders to come to agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a longtime priority of soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
What's the TPP, you ask?
It's a giant trade agreement between the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations -- including Australia, Japan, and Malaysia, among others -- now being negotiated in secret.
Well, mostly in secret. Around 600 corporations and a few labor unions with stakes in the talks have seen a draft. Except for a few chapters released by WikiLeaks last year, Congress and the public have not.
But here's what we do know: This so-called "partnership" is an insult to U.S. workers. And it's especially bad news for women.
According to Doctors Without Borders, for example, the agreement's intellectual property clauses could cut off access to generic drugs for people living with HIV/AIDS -- who are increasingly women and kids.
And the Communications Workers of America union says the pact will make it easier for corporations to outsource majority-female jobs -- not only in low-wage workplaces such as call centers, but also higher-wage sectors like human resources.
So it's no surprise that women in Congress have been leading the opposition to the TPP for some time.
In the House, Democrats Rosa DeLauro and Louise Slaughter pointed out in a forceful Los Angeles Times op-ed that the agreement would force Americans to compete against workers from extremely low-wage countries. It would also, they argued, roll back environmental standards and U.S. laws that protect food and drug safety.
In the Senate, Democrat Elizabeth Warren has expressed worries that the secretive agreement could weaken financial regulations. She opposed the appointment of Michael Froman as the U.S. trade representative -- a job that has made him the chief arbiter of the treaty-making process -- because he flatly stated his opposition to more transparency in the negotiations.
And there's another little-known provision.
Under the proposed rules, businesses incorporated in TPP countries -- any of them -- would be guaranteed equal treatment with U.S. firms when bidding on government contracts.
That means our tax dollars could go to underwriting companies in countries like Brunei, which imprisons unmarried women for getting pregnant and allows the stoning of gays and lesbians.
I'm all for cooperation in government, and I do hope President Obama and Mitch McConnell can agree on some things -- like a higher minimum wage for instance.
But the Trans-Pacific Partnership? Sink it.
Martha Burk
Martha Burk is a political psychologist, women's issues expert, and director of the Corporate Accountability Project for the National Council of Women's Organizations (NCWO) and the author of the "Your Voice, Your Vote" (2020). Follow Martha on Twitter @MarthaBurk.
President Barack Obama has insisted up and down that he's willing to work with the Republicans who are taking over the Senate.
He proved it during his recent visit to Beijing, where he urged world leaders to come to agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a longtime priority of soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
What's the TPP, you ask?
It's a giant trade agreement between the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations -- including Australia, Japan, and Malaysia, among others -- now being negotiated in secret.
Well, mostly in secret. Around 600 corporations and a few labor unions with stakes in the talks have seen a draft. Except for a few chapters released by WikiLeaks last year, Congress and the public have not.
But here's what we do know: This so-called "partnership" is an insult to U.S. workers. And it's especially bad news for women.
According to Doctors Without Borders, for example, the agreement's intellectual property clauses could cut off access to generic drugs for people living with HIV/AIDS -- who are increasingly women and kids.
And the Communications Workers of America union says the pact will make it easier for corporations to outsource majority-female jobs -- not only in low-wage workplaces such as call centers, but also higher-wage sectors like human resources.
So it's no surprise that women in Congress have been leading the opposition to the TPP for some time.
In the House, Democrats Rosa DeLauro and Louise Slaughter pointed out in a forceful Los Angeles Times op-ed that the agreement would force Americans to compete against workers from extremely low-wage countries. It would also, they argued, roll back environmental standards and U.S. laws that protect food and drug safety.
In the Senate, Democrat Elizabeth Warren has expressed worries that the secretive agreement could weaken financial regulations. She opposed the appointment of Michael Froman as the U.S. trade representative -- a job that has made him the chief arbiter of the treaty-making process -- because he flatly stated his opposition to more transparency in the negotiations.
And there's another little-known provision.
Under the proposed rules, businesses incorporated in TPP countries -- any of them -- would be guaranteed equal treatment with U.S. firms when bidding on government contracts.
That means our tax dollars could go to underwriting companies in countries like Brunei, which imprisons unmarried women for getting pregnant and allows the stoning of gays and lesbians.
I'm all for cooperation in government, and I do hope President Obama and Mitch McConnell can agree on some things -- like a higher minimum wage for instance.
But the Trans-Pacific Partnership? Sink it.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.