SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Investing in a Sustainable Food and Farm Future
Sep 15, 2014
This week, state agriculture officials from across the country have gathered on the shores of Lake Champlain for the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) annual meeting in Burlington, Vermont. These leaders have a unique opportunity to increase collaboration aimed at ensuring an abundant, nutritious food supply that promotes environmental stewardship and community health.
With numerous small dairies and diversified and organic farms, New England may appear to have little in common with farming regions in the Midwest and Pacific coast. But they all share a number of challenges and opportunities that call for collaborative action across states and regions: Hunger, poor nutrition, and inequity persist in every state; farmers of all types are on the front lines of adapting to climate change; and agriculture officials are wrestling with how to scale up local food and farming. Consumer interest and understanding about how food is produced is increasing in pockets, but needs to be broadly expanded to ensure diverse participation in decision making about how we feed ourselves.
At the same time, large-scale conventional agriculture needs to be made more sustainable. Just last month, a toxic bloom of Cyanobacteria in Lake Erie contaminated the water supply of Toledo, Ohio and parts of southern Michigan, grabbing national headlines as it left these communities without safe drinking water for two days. The toxic bloom formed because agricultural runoff, including fertilizer from farm fields and manure from CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations), spurred rapid growth of naturally occurring bacteria in the water, upsetting the lake's delicate balance.
In response to the crisis, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) quickly pledged $2 million to help farmers in the region plant cover crops, which protect soil between main crop production seasons. Cover crops reduce pollution by capturing nutrients in the soil, while also preventing erosion and helping farmers withstand drought. The elegance of this practice is that agriculture and the environment work together--what's beneficial for one is beneficial for both.
Such symbiotic solutions are investigated and tested within the emerging scientific field known as "agroecology." An agroecological approach designs and manages farms with whole ecosystems--soils, plants, animals, the atmosphere, and human beings--in mind. By understanding the connections between each component, farmers can be productive while building essential natural resources.
There are a growing number of examples from public universities that show how agroecological practices can produce multiple benefits. Research at the University of New Hampshire is demonstrating how an organic dairy farm can generate energy and reduce environmental impacts, while a long-term study at Iowa State University has shown that more diversified farming systems can reduce chemical use and increase farmers' profitability.
Despite their potential, a lack of funding is holding back further development of such systems. Most research investments support practices that depend on agribusiness products--like seeds designed to work with specific chemicals--rather than agroecological innovations that increase farmer choices and resilience and reduce costly pollution. NASDA leadership could make a real difference by working with the USDA to direct more funding to research and incentives that help farmers implement sustainable practices on a large scale, and not just when crisis strikes.
If they do this, the scientific community is behind them. Since July, more than 270 scientists and experts have signed a statement calling for an increased public investment in agroecology that would spur wider adoption of sustainable practices. Farmers would benefit through greater resilience to droughts, floods and other climate extremes. And we would all reap the benefits of reduced pollution--cleaner waterways, safer drinking water, and more productive fisheries.
After drinking water was restored in Toledo last month, the city's mayor described the incident as a wakeup call. But it must not be limited to Ohio, and we can't afford to hit the snooze button. Here in the Northeast, A New England Food Vision--a collaborative research effort--envisions tripling the amount of farmland in production by 2060. As agriculture expands across the country, agricultural leaders must ensure this is done sustainably, while embracing the potential of agroecology. Our future depends on it.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Hill
Ricardo Salvador
Ricardo Salvador is an agronomist and director of the Food and Environment program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Tom Kelly
Tom Kelly is the founding director of the Sustainability Institute at the University of New Hampshire that serves as the convener of Food Solutions New England.
This week, state agriculture officials from across the country have gathered on the shores of Lake Champlain for the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) annual meeting in Burlington, Vermont. These leaders have a unique opportunity to increase collaboration aimed at ensuring an abundant, nutritious food supply that promotes environmental stewardship and community health.
With numerous small dairies and diversified and organic farms, New England may appear to have little in common with farming regions in the Midwest and Pacific coast. But they all share a number of challenges and opportunities that call for collaborative action across states and regions: Hunger, poor nutrition, and inequity persist in every state; farmers of all types are on the front lines of adapting to climate change; and agriculture officials are wrestling with how to scale up local food and farming. Consumer interest and understanding about how food is produced is increasing in pockets, but needs to be broadly expanded to ensure diverse participation in decision making about how we feed ourselves.
At the same time, large-scale conventional agriculture needs to be made more sustainable. Just last month, a toxic bloom of Cyanobacteria in Lake Erie contaminated the water supply of Toledo, Ohio and parts of southern Michigan, grabbing national headlines as it left these communities without safe drinking water for two days. The toxic bloom formed because agricultural runoff, including fertilizer from farm fields and manure from CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations), spurred rapid growth of naturally occurring bacteria in the water, upsetting the lake's delicate balance.
In response to the crisis, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) quickly pledged $2 million to help farmers in the region plant cover crops, which protect soil between main crop production seasons. Cover crops reduce pollution by capturing nutrients in the soil, while also preventing erosion and helping farmers withstand drought. The elegance of this practice is that agriculture and the environment work together--what's beneficial for one is beneficial for both.
Such symbiotic solutions are investigated and tested within the emerging scientific field known as "agroecology." An agroecological approach designs and manages farms with whole ecosystems--soils, plants, animals, the atmosphere, and human beings--in mind. By understanding the connections between each component, farmers can be productive while building essential natural resources.
There are a growing number of examples from public universities that show how agroecological practices can produce multiple benefits. Research at the University of New Hampshire is demonstrating how an organic dairy farm can generate energy and reduce environmental impacts, while a long-term study at Iowa State University has shown that more diversified farming systems can reduce chemical use and increase farmers' profitability.
Despite their potential, a lack of funding is holding back further development of such systems. Most research investments support practices that depend on agribusiness products--like seeds designed to work with specific chemicals--rather than agroecological innovations that increase farmer choices and resilience and reduce costly pollution. NASDA leadership could make a real difference by working with the USDA to direct more funding to research and incentives that help farmers implement sustainable practices on a large scale, and not just when crisis strikes.
If they do this, the scientific community is behind them. Since July, more than 270 scientists and experts have signed a statement calling for an increased public investment in agroecology that would spur wider adoption of sustainable practices. Farmers would benefit through greater resilience to droughts, floods and other climate extremes. And we would all reap the benefits of reduced pollution--cleaner waterways, safer drinking water, and more productive fisheries.
After drinking water was restored in Toledo last month, the city's mayor described the incident as a wakeup call. But it must not be limited to Ohio, and we can't afford to hit the snooze button. Here in the Northeast, A New England Food Vision--a collaborative research effort--envisions tripling the amount of farmland in production by 2060. As agriculture expands across the country, agricultural leaders must ensure this is done sustainably, while embracing the potential of agroecology. Our future depends on it.
Ricardo Salvador
Ricardo Salvador is an agronomist and director of the Food and Environment program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Tom Kelly
Tom Kelly is the founding director of the Sustainability Institute at the University of New Hampshire that serves as the convener of Food Solutions New England.
This week, state agriculture officials from across the country have gathered on the shores of Lake Champlain for the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) annual meeting in Burlington, Vermont. These leaders have a unique opportunity to increase collaboration aimed at ensuring an abundant, nutritious food supply that promotes environmental stewardship and community health.
With numerous small dairies and diversified and organic farms, New England may appear to have little in common with farming regions in the Midwest and Pacific coast. But they all share a number of challenges and opportunities that call for collaborative action across states and regions: Hunger, poor nutrition, and inequity persist in every state; farmers of all types are on the front lines of adapting to climate change; and agriculture officials are wrestling with how to scale up local food and farming. Consumer interest and understanding about how food is produced is increasing in pockets, but needs to be broadly expanded to ensure diverse participation in decision making about how we feed ourselves.
At the same time, large-scale conventional agriculture needs to be made more sustainable. Just last month, a toxic bloom of Cyanobacteria in Lake Erie contaminated the water supply of Toledo, Ohio and parts of southern Michigan, grabbing national headlines as it left these communities without safe drinking water for two days. The toxic bloom formed because agricultural runoff, including fertilizer from farm fields and manure from CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations), spurred rapid growth of naturally occurring bacteria in the water, upsetting the lake's delicate balance.
In response to the crisis, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) quickly pledged $2 million to help farmers in the region plant cover crops, which protect soil between main crop production seasons. Cover crops reduce pollution by capturing nutrients in the soil, while also preventing erosion and helping farmers withstand drought. The elegance of this practice is that agriculture and the environment work together--what's beneficial for one is beneficial for both.
Such symbiotic solutions are investigated and tested within the emerging scientific field known as "agroecology." An agroecological approach designs and manages farms with whole ecosystems--soils, plants, animals, the atmosphere, and human beings--in mind. By understanding the connections between each component, farmers can be productive while building essential natural resources.
There are a growing number of examples from public universities that show how agroecological practices can produce multiple benefits. Research at the University of New Hampshire is demonstrating how an organic dairy farm can generate energy and reduce environmental impacts, while a long-term study at Iowa State University has shown that more diversified farming systems can reduce chemical use and increase farmers' profitability.
Despite their potential, a lack of funding is holding back further development of such systems. Most research investments support practices that depend on agribusiness products--like seeds designed to work with specific chemicals--rather than agroecological innovations that increase farmer choices and resilience and reduce costly pollution. NASDA leadership could make a real difference by working with the USDA to direct more funding to research and incentives that help farmers implement sustainable practices on a large scale, and not just when crisis strikes.
If they do this, the scientific community is behind them. Since July, more than 270 scientists and experts have signed a statement calling for an increased public investment in agroecology that would spur wider adoption of sustainable practices. Farmers would benefit through greater resilience to droughts, floods and other climate extremes. And we would all reap the benefits of reduced pollution--cleaner waterways, safer drinking water, and more productive fisheries.
After drinking water was restored in Toledo last month, the city's mayor described the incident as a wakeup call. But it must not be limited to Ohio, and we can't afford to hit the snooze button. Here in the Northeast, A New England Food Vision--a collaborative research effort--envisions tripling the amount of farmland in production by 2060. As agriculture expands across the country, agricultural leaders must ensure this is done sustainably, while embracing the potential of agroecology. Our future depends on it.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.