Grasping at "Turning Points" in Afghanistan
A front page story in today's New York Times threw a bucket of cold
water on the Obama administration's latest attempt to declare yet
another "turning point" for US policy in Afghanistan.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a font of enthusiasm about
prospects in Afghanistan yesterday. As a conference of foreign leaders
supporting the US military-led Afghanistan strategy wrapped up in Kabul,
Secretary Clinton declared, "Today was a real turning point!"
A front page story in today's New York Times threw a bucket of cold
water on the Obama administration's latest attempt to declare yet
another "turning point" for US policy in Afghanistan.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a font of enthusiasm about
prospects in Afghanistan yesterday. As a conference of foreign leaders
supporting the US military-led Afghanistan strategy wrapped up in Kabul,
Secretary Clinton declared, "Today was a real turning point!"
Today the New York Times' David Sanger writes that support for the
strategy among even the President's Afghanistan allies is withering.
Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and a once reliable supporter of the policy, pointed out the
obvious that both the military and civilian missions were "proceeding
without a clear definition of success". A majority of Democrats in the
House agree. Earlier this month 153 of them voted for the McGovern
amendment to the Afghanistan supplemental appropriation, demanding that
the open ended military commitment to the Karzai government be closed.
Speaker Pelosi was among them. The President needed the votes of a solid
majority of Republican House members to defeat the amendment.
Which is why Senator Lugar's eroding support cannot be good news at
the White House. Up to this point, Republicans have been the
administration's bedrock of Congressional support for its Afghanistan
policy. It has been the only issue that has been off limits in the daily
barrage of Republican attacks against the administration (Chairman
Steel's recent moment of candor
on Afghanistan notwithstanding). Now, one of their most respected
foreign policy Congressional leaders is abandoning the sinking
Afghanistan policy ship. Lugar is not your typical Republican flame
thrower. Respected on both sides of the political aisle, Sanger
describes Lugar as "one of Mr. Obama's mentors on foreign policy issues
in the Senate."
Still, the administration continues on with its victory-is-at-hand
message. Those who have been following the longest war in US history,
probably experienced a bit of Deja vu with Secretary Clinton's "turning
point" declaration in Kabul.
Last December, long before his Rolling Stone moment, General Stanley
McChrystal breathlessly described what he called "an inflection point"
in Afghanistan: "A tremendous amount of things are going to happen, and
they are good things that are going to happen" he enthused.
In January, Navy Admiral James Stavridis joined the turning point
parade, describing what he considered a "signal change", a "big shift"
and "real progress" with security forces in Afghanistan: "2010 is the
year. This is the time!"
Meanwhile, back in reality, 2010 is turning out to be the deadliest
year of the almost nine year war. Suicide bombings have tripled since
the Obama escalation began. Assassinations of civilians are up 45%. The
number of improvised explosive device (IED) attacks rose by 94% in the
first four months of 2010. There have been 251 U.S. soldiers killed this
year compared to 131 at this time last year. Every month of 2010 turns
out to be the deadliest month for U.S. soldiers since the war began.
July will be no exception with already 49 deaths, surpassing last year's
count of 45.
The Afghanistan war "turning point" parade turns out to be a long
one. General Peter Pace, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when
George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief, described, "a huge turning
point" in Afghanistan: "I've seen a remarkable change in Afghanistan in
the last year!" The year was 2004.
The Obama administration's credibility erodes every time it dusts off
and redeploys the tired "turning point" mantra to describe a war and a
strategy that continues to go from bad to worse. The reality is that a
political turning point is taking shape in the House, where a strong
majority of Democrats voted to represent the view of a majority of
Americans--that the war in Afghanistan is not worth it. And, it is
unfolding in the Senate where a respected Republican joined the chorus
of criticism against the war. The genuine turning point in Afghanistan
will occur when the Obama administration turns its failing military led
strategy around. For the hundred thousand US troops on the ground, that
turnaround cannot come too soon.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A front page story in today's New York Times threw a bucket of cold
water on the Obama administration's latest attempt to declare yet
another "turning point" for US policy in Afghanistan.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a font of enthusiasm about
prospects in Afghanistan yesterday. As a conference of foreign leaders
supporting the US military-led Afghanistan strategy wrapped up in Kabul,
Secretary Clinton declared, "Today was a real turning point!"
Today the New York Times' David Sanger writes that support for the
strategy among even the President's Afghanistan allies is withering.
Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and a once reliable supporter of the policy, pointed out the
obvious that both the military and civilian missions were "proceeding
without a clear definition of success". A majority of Democrats in the
House agree. Earlier this month 153 of them voted for the McGovern
amendment to the Afghanistan supplemental appropriation, demanding that
the open ended military commitment to the Karzai government be closed.
Speaker Pelosi was among them. The President needed the votes of a solid
majority of Republican House members to defeat the amendment.
Which is why Senator Lugar's eroding support cannot be good news at
the White House. Up to this point, Republicans have been the
administration's bedrock of Congressional support for its Afghanistan
policy. It has been the only issue that has been off limits in the daily
barrage of Republican attacks against the administration (Chairman
Steel's recent moment of candor
on Afghanistan notwithstanding). Now, one of their most respected
foreign policy Congressional leaders is abandoning the sinking
Afghanistan policy ship. Lugar is not your typical Republican flame
thrower. Respected on both sides of the political aisle, Sanger
describes Lugar as "one of Mr. Obama's mentors on foreign policy issues
in the Senate."
Still, the administration continues on with its victory-is-at-hand
message. Those who have been following the longest war in US history,
probably experienced a bit of Deja vu with Secretary Clinton's "turning
point" declaration in Kabul.
Last December, long before his Rolling Stone moment, General Stanley
McChrystal breathlessly described what he called "an inflection point"
in Afghanistan: "A tremendous amount of things are going to happen, and
they are good things that are going to happen" he enthused.
In January, Navy Admiral James Stavridis joined the turning point
parade, describing what he considered a "signal change", a "big shift"
and "real progress" with security forces in Afghanistan: "2010 is the
year. This is the time!"
Meanwhile, back in reality, 2010 is turning out to be the deadliest
year of the almost nine year war. Suicide bombings have tripled since
the Obama escalation began. Assassinations of civilians are up 45%. The
number of improvised explosive device (IED) attacks rose by 94% in the
first four months of 2010. There have been 251 U.S. soldiers killed this
year compared to 131 at this time last year. Every month of 2010 turns
out to be the deadliest month for U.S. soldiers since the war began.
July will be no exception with already 49 deaths, surpassing last year's
count of 45.
The Afghanistan war "turning point" parade turns out to be a long
one. General Peter Pace, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when
George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief, described, "a huge turning
point" in Afghanistan: "I've seen a remarkable change in Afghanistan in
the last year!" The year was 2004.
The Obama administration's credibility erodes every time it dusts off
and redeploys the tired "turning point" mantra to describe a war and a
strategy that continues to go from bad to worse. The reality is that a
political turning point is taking shape in the House, where a strong
majority of Democrats voted to represent the view of a majority of
Americans--that the war in Afghanistan is not worth it. And, it is
unfolding in the Senate where a respected Republican joined the chorus
of criticism against the war. The genuine turning point in Afghanistan
will occur when the Obama administration turns its failing military led
strategy around. For the hundred thousand US troops on the ground, that
turnaround cannot come too soon.
A front page story in today's New York Times threw a bucket of cold
water on the Obama administration's latest attempt to declare yet
another "turning point" for US policy in Afghanistan.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a font of enthusiasm about
prospects in Afghanistan yesterday. As a conference of foreign leaders
supporting the US military-led Afghanistan strategy wrapped up in Kabul,
Secretary Clinton declared, "Today was a real turning point!"
Today the New York Times' David Sanger writes that support for the
strategy among even the President's Afghanistan allies is withering.
Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and a once reliable supporter of the policy, pointed out the
obvious that both the military and civilian missions were "proceeding
without a clear definition of success". A majority of Democrats in the
House agree. Earlier this month 153 of them voted for the McGovern
amendment to the Afghanistan supplemental appropriation, demanding that
the open ended military commitment to the Karzai government be closed.
Speaker Pelosi was among them. The President needed the votes of a solid
majority of Republican House members to defeat the amendment.
Which is why Senator Lugar's eroding support cannot be good news at
the White House. Up to this point, Republicans have been the
administration's bedrock of Congressional support for its Afghanistan
policy. It has been the only issue that has been off limits in the daily
barrage of Republican attacks against the administration (Chairman
Steel's recent moment of candor
on Afghanistan notwithstanding). Now, one of their most respected
foreign policy Congressional leaders is abandoning the sinking
Afghanistan policy ship. Lugar is not your typical Republican flame
thrower. Respected on both sides of the political aisle, Sanger
describes Lugar as "one of Mr. Obama's mentors on foreign policy issues
in the Senate."
Still, the administration continues on with its victory-is-at-hand
message. Those who have been following the longest war in US history,
probably experienced a bit of Deja vu with Secretary Clinton's "turning
point" declaration in Kabul.
Last December, long before his Rolling Stone moment, General Stanley
McChrystal breathlessly described what he called "an inflection point"
in Afghanistan: "A tremendous amount of things are going to happen, and
they are good things that are going to happen" he enthused.
In January, Navy Admiral James Stavridis joined the turning point
parade, describing what he considered a "signal change", a "big shift"
and "real progress" with security forces in Afghanistan: "2010 is the
year. This is the time!"
Meanwhile, back in reality, 2010 is turning out to be the deadliest
year of the almost nine year war. Suicide bombings have tripled since
the Obama escalation began. Assassinations of civilians are up 45%. The
number of improvised explosive device (IED) attacks rose by 94% in the
first four months of 2010. There have been 251 U.S. soldiers killed this
year compared to 131 at this time last year. Every month of 2010 turns
out to be the deadliest month for U.S. soldiers since the war began.
July will be no exception with already 49 deaths, surpassing last year's
count of 45.
The Afghanistan war "turning point" parade turns out to be a long
one. General Peter Pace, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when
George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief, described, "a huge turning
point" in Afghanistan: "I've seen a remarkable change in Afghanistan in
the last year!" The year was 2004.
The Obama administration's credibility erodes every time it dusts off
and redeploys the tired "turning point" mantra to describe a war and a
strategy that continues to go from bad to worse. The reality is that a
political turning point is taking shape in the House, where a strong
majority of Democrats voted to represent the view of a majority of
Americans--that the war in Afghanistan is not worth it. And, it is
unfolding in the Senate where a respected Republican joined the chorus
of criticism against the war. The genuine turning point in Afghanistan
will occur when the Obama administration turns its failing military led
strategy around. For the hundred thousand US troops on the ground, that
turnaround cannot come too soon.