My Canada Includes War, Environmental Degradation and Lost Causes
In 1999, when I packed for a month in the Middle East, I made a point of bringing my Huron-made, deerskin fringed jacket.
Nothing, I thought, screamed "I am not one of you" like that jacket, which was mostly too hot and too heavy for a month-long trip clambering over the desert rocks and ruins. Although I am not much into jewellery, I also wore a red maple leaf stick pin.
I was a proud Canadian, smug and self-confident that my country was all mountains, moose, maple syrup and peacemaker in the valley.
Boy, was that ever wrong.
In 1999, when I packed for a month in the Middle East, I made a point of bringing my Huron-made, deerskin fringed jacket.
Nothing, I thought, screamed "I am not one of you" like that jacket, which was mostly too hot and too heavy for a month-long trip clambering over the desert rocks and ruins. Although I am not much into jewellery, I also wore a red maple leaf stick pin.
I was a proud Canadian, smug and self-confident that my country was all mountains, moose, maple syrup and peacemaker in the valley.
Boy, was that ever wrong.
And it's even more wrong now.
It took a distinguished diplomat such as Robert Fowler, who made news last year after his kidnapping by Al Qaeda in Niger, to slap not only the Liberal Party last weekend at its Canada 150 conference, but also the Conservative government and those Canadians who, still, cling to that Trudeau-era belief that we are the Dudley Do-Right of nations.
He attacked Canada for all but abandoning Africa, where war, starvation, disease, overpopulation, Islamofascism and other plagues are mixing together to make a toxic soup of terrorism that will spill across the continent, while we waste blood and treasure on the lost cause of Afghanistan.
Pointing to those who support the war, Fowler said: "Look, they say, at the number of little girls we have put in school -- at a cost of 146 Canadian lives, thousands of Afghan lives, and, according to the Government website, an incremental cost, since 2001, of $11.3 billion, including $1.7 billion in development assistance from CIDA's budget.
"My ..... think of the number of girls we could put in school throughout the Third World -- particularly in Africa -- with that kind of money! And we could do so without having to kill and be killed to get that worthy job done."
It's not just Afghanistan.
Over the past few years, Canada has been shifting its foreign aid priorities away from Africa to Latin America, where new free trade deals will protect Canada's business interests in, among other sectors, the mining industry.
Canada's hands are not clean there are either, as human rights activists insist. They're documenting how workers and the environment are being exploited and devastated.
It gets worse.
Canada is also heavily into the weapons trade, an industry we hardly ever see covered in the business pages.
According to the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, between 2003 and 2006, Canadian military exports totalled at least $7.4 billion, mostly to the U.S.O, where it went into the weapons used everywhere from Iraq to Gaza.
Fowler, who kicked open a can of foreign policy worms that, I hope, will crawl into Canadian's consciousness and consciences, made it very clear that this country has lost its way. To simplify his message, there's too much politicking, not enough policy.
But there's no business like the war business, as the U.S. has demonstrated time after bloody time.
According to the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, in 2008, world "defence spending" hit $1.55 trillion (U.S.) -- and that doesn't count countries where the bombs are homemade.
Imagine how much misery that kind of money could eliminate.
Imagine how many terrorists would not be created as a result.
Fowler's can of worms must not be put back under the rock where too many people in Canada would prefer to hide it.
But, if some initial reactions on Twitter and elsewhere are any indication, it's only a matter of time before he gets slimed.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In 1999, when I packed for a month in the Middle East, I made a point of bringing my Huron-made, deerskin fringed jacket.
Nothing, I thought, screamed "I am not one of you" like that jacket, which was mostly too hot and too heavy for a month-long trip clambering over the desert rocks and ruins. Although I am not much into jewellery, I also wore a red maple leaf stick pin.
I was a proud Canadian, smug and self-confident that my country was all mountains, moose, maple syrup and peacemaker in the valley.
Boy, was that ever wrong.
And it's even more wrong now.
It took a distinguished diplomat such as Robert Fowler, who made news last year after his kidnapping by Al Qaeda in Niger, to slap not only the Liberal Party last weekend at its Canada 150 conference, but also the Conservative government and those Canadians who, still, cling to that Trudeau-era belief that we are the Dudley Do-Right of nations.
He attacked Canada for all but abandoning Africa, where war, starvation, disease, overpopulation, Islamofascism and other plagues are mixing together to make a toxic soup of terrorism that will spill across the continent, while we waste blood and treasure on the lost cause of Afghanistan.
Pointing to those who support the war, Fowler said: "Look, they say, at the number of little girls we have put in school -- at a cost of 146 Canadian lives, thousands of Afghan lives, and, according to the Government website, an incremental cost, since 2001, of $11.3 billion, including $1.7 billion in development assistance from CIDA's budget.
"My ..... think of the number of girls we could put in school throughout the Third World -- particularly in Africa -- with that kind of money! And we could do so without having to kill and be killed to get that worthy job done."
It's not just Afghanistan.
Over the past few years, Canada has been shifting its foreign aid priorities away from Africa to Latin America, where new free trade deals will protect Canada's business interests in, among other sectors, the mining industry.
Canada's hands are not clean there are either, as human rights activists insist. They're documenting how workers and the environment are being exploited and devastated.
It gets worse.
Canada is also heavily into the weapons trade, an industry we hardly ever see covered in the business pages.
According to the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, between 2003 and 2006, Canadian military exports totalled at least $7.4 billion, mostly to the U.S.O, where it went into the weapons used everywhere from Iraq to Gaza.
Fowler, who kicked open a can of foreign policy worms that, I hope, will crawl into Canadian's consciousness and consciences, made it very clear that this country has lost its way. To simplify his message, there's too much politicking, not enough policy.
But there's no business like the war business, as the U.S. has demonstrated time after bloody time.
According to the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, in 2008, world "defence spending" hit $1.55 trillion (U.S.) -- and that doesn't count countries where the bombs are homemade.
Imagine how much misery that kind of money could eliminate.
Imagine how many terrorists would not be created as a result.
Fowler's can of worms must not be put back under the rock where too many people in Canada would prefer to hide it.
But, if some initial reactions on Twitter and elsewhere are any indication, it's only a matter of time before he gets slimed.
In 1999, when I packed for a month in the Middle East, I made a point of bringing my Huron-made, deerskin fringed jacket.
Nothing, I thought, screamed "I am not one of you" like that jacket, which was mostly too hot and too heavy for a month-long trip clambering over the desert rocks and ruins. Although I am not much into jewellery, I also wore a red maple leaf stick pin.
I was a proud Canadian, smug and self-confident that my country was all mountains, moose, maple syrup and peacemaker in the valley.
Boy, was that ever wrong.
And it's even more wrong now.
It took a distinguished diplomat such as Robert Fowler, who made news last year after his kidnapping by Al Qaeda in Niger, to slap not only the Liberal Party last weekend at its Canada 150 conference, but also the Conservative government and those Canadians who, still, cling to that Trudeau-era belief that we are the Dudley Do-Right of nations.
He attacked Canada for all but abandoning Africa, where war, starvation, disease, overpopulation, Islamofascism and other plagues are mixing together to make a toxic soup of terrorism that will spill across the continent, while we waste blood and treasure on the lost cause of Afghanistan.
Pointing to those who support the war, Fowler said: "Look, they say, at the number of little girls we have put in school -- at a cost of 146 Canadian lives, thousands of Afghan lives, and, according to the Government website, an incremental cost, since 2001, of $11.3 billion, including $1.7 billion in development assistance from CIDA's budget.
"My ..... think of the number of girls we could put in school throughout the Third World -- particularly in Africa -- with that kind of money! And we could do so without having to kill and be killed to get that worthy job done."
It's not just Afghanistan.
Over the past few years, Canada has been shifting its foreign aid priorities away from Africa to Latin America, where new free trade deals will protect Canada's business interests in, among other sectors, the mining industry.
Canada's hands are not clean there are either, as human rights activists insist. They're documenting how workers and the environment are being exploited and devastated.
It gets worse.
Canada is also heavily into the weapons trade, an industry we hardly ever see covered in the business pages.
According to the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, between 2003 and 2006, Canadian military exports totalled at least $7.4 billion, mostly to the U.S.O, where it went into the weapons used everywhere from Iraq to Gaza.
Fowler, who kicked open a can of foreign policy worms that, I hope, will crawl into Canadian's consciousness and consciences, made it very clear that this country has lost its way. To simplify his message, there's too much politicking, not enough policy.
But there's no business like the war business, as the U.S. has demonstrated time after bloody time.
According to the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, in 2008, world "defence spending" hit $1.55 trillion (U.S.) -- and that doesn't count countries where the bombs are homemade.
Imagine how much misery that kind of money could eliminate.
Imagine how many terrorists would not be created as a result.
Fowler's can of worms must not be put back under the rock where too many people in Canada would prefer to hide it.
But, if some initial reactions on Twitter and elsewhere are any indication, it's only a matter of time before he gets slimed.