SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Though Obviously Hypocritical, GOP Has Chance to Outflank Dems on Health Care Populism
Late last week,
Firedoglake highlighted this stunning exchange between activist Mike
Stark and retiring GOP Rep. John Shadegg over health care:
SHADEGG: Both the House and Senate bills contain
mandates that compel, or would compel you and I as individual Americans
to buy insurance from Americas private insurance industry. I think
America's private insurance industry is the problem...STARK: So are you for a public option?
Jan 19, 2010
Late last week,
Firedoglake highlighted this stunning exchange between activist Mike
Stark and retiring GOP Rep. John Shadegg over health care:
SHADEGG: Both the House and Senate bills contain
mandates that compel, or would compel you and I as individual Americans
to buy insurance from Americas private insurance industry. I think
America's private insurance industry is the problem...STARK: So are you for a public option?
SHADDEG: Well, you could better defend a public option than you
could defend compelling me to buy a product from the people that have
created the problem. America's health insurance industry has wanted
this bill and the individual mandate from the get go. That's their
idea. Their idea is "look, our product is so lousy, that lots of people
don't buy it. So we need the government to force people to buy our
product. And stunningly, that's what the Congress appears to be going
along with. Why would they do that?...The notion of forcing Americans
to buy a product they don't want to buy from companies that aren't
doing it right right now is goofy...Making the IRS the bill collector
for Aetna and the rest of America's insurance companies...Blue
Cross/Blue Shield and United...isn't the way to do it.
Let's first get the issue of Shadegg's integrity out of the way here
- he's obviously a hypocrite. This is a lawmaker who could have voted
for the public option that he suggests has value, and could have voted
for much stronger overall health care reform bills in the past.
However, hypocrisy by a politician is hardly interesting in an
age when President Obama has broken so many explicit promises it's hard
to even count them anymore. What is far more notable is the substantive
argument Shadegg is voicing - it's both accurate and politically
telling.
Shadegg is absolutely correct that "America's private insurance
industry is the problem." He is also correct that this legislation is
exactly what that industry wants - not, as the Orwellian White House
spokesholes insist, some great victory over that industry. And Shadegg
is right that compelling people to buy an expensive (and faulty)
product from a private corporation without giving people at least the
choice of a public product is unprecedented and grotesque.
If the health care bill is not improved, this is exactly the
kind of argument the Republicans will make in the 2010 and 2012
election. And I say that not just because one lone GOP congressman is
making the argument, but because you are starting to hear a similar
case being made by top Republican Party officials.
Case in point is the interview I did last week on my AM760
radio show with Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dick Wadhams. You
can listen to it here - and specifically, listen to him rail on the insurance industry.
Again, it's obviously disingenuous coming from Republicans as
the GOP has been shilling for the insurance industry for years.
However, that doesn't mean it won't be powerful. It will be - and it
will be precisely because the Democrats - in weakening the health
legislation - have allowed Republicans to potentially outflank them (at
least image-wise) as the populist party of the little guy.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
Late last week,
Firedoglake highlighted this stunning exchange between activist Mike
Stark and retiring GOP Rep. John Shadegg over health care:
SHADEGG: Both the House and Senate bills contain
mandates that compel, or would compel you and I as individual Americans
to buy insurance from Americas private insurance industry. I think
America's private insurance industry is the problem...STARK: So are you for a public option?
SHADDEG: Well, you could better defend a public option than you
could defend compelling me to buy a product from the people that have
created the problem. America's health insurance industry has wanted
this bill and the individual mandate from the get go. That's their
idea. Their idea is "look, our product is so lousy, that lots of people
don't buy it. So we need the government to force people to buy our
product. And stunningly, that's what the Congress appears to be going
along with. Why would they do that?...The notion of forcing Americans
to buy a product they don't want to buy from companies that aren't
doing it right right now is goofy...Making the IRS the bill collector
for Aetna and the rest of America's insurance companies...Blue
Cross/Blue Shield and United...isn't the way to do it.
Let's first get the issue of Shadegg's integrity out of the way here
- he's obviously a hypocrite. This is a lawmaker who could have voted
for the public option that he suggests has value, and could have voted
for much stronger overall health care reform bills in the past.
However, hypocrisy by a politician is hardly interesting in an
age when President Obama has broken so many explicit promises it's hard
to even count them anymore. What is far more notable is the substantive
argument Shadegg is voicing - it's both accurate and politically
telling.
Shadegg is absolutely correct that "America's private insurance
industry is the problem." He is also correct that this legislation is
exactly what that industry wants - not, as the Orwellian White House
spokesholes insist, some great victory over that industry. And Shadegg
is right that compelling people to buy an expensive (and faulty)
product from a private corporation without giving people at least the
choice of a public product is unprecedented and grotesque.
If the health care bill is not improved, this is exactly the
kind of argument the Republicans will make in the 2010 and 2012
election. And I say that not just because one lone GOP congressman is
making the argument, but because you are starting to hear a similar
case being made by top Republican Party officials.
Case in point is the interview I did last week on my AM760
radio show with Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dick Wadhams. You
can listen to it here - and specifically, listen to him rail on the insurance industry.
Again, it's obviously disingenuous coming from Republicans as
the GOP has been shilling for the insurance industry for years.
However, that doesn't mean it won't be powerful. It will be - and it
will be precisely because the Democrats - in weakening the health
legislation - have allowed Republicans to potentially outflank them (at
least image-wise) as the populist party of the little guy.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
Late last week,
Firedoglake highlighted this stunning exchange between activist Mike
Stark and retiring GOP Rep. John Shadegg over health care:
SHADEGG: Both the House and Senate bills contain
mandates that compel, or would compel you and I as individual Americans
to buy insurance from Americas private insurance industry. I think
America's private insurance industry is the problem...STARK: So are you for a public option?
SHADDEG: Well, you could better defend a public option than you
could defend compelling me to buy a product from the people that have
created the problem. America's health insurance industry has wanted
this bill and the individual mandate from the get go. That's their
idea. Their idea is "look, our product is so lousy, that lots of people
don't buy it. So we need the government to force people to buy our
product. And stunningly, that's what the Congress appears to be going
along with. Why would they do that?...The notion of forcing Americans
to buy a product they don't want to buy from companies that aren't
doing it right right now is goofy...Making the IRS the bill collector
for Aetna and the rest of America's insurance companies...Blue
Cross/Blue Shield and United...isn't the way to do it.
Let's first get the issue of Shadegg's integrity out of the way here
- he's obviously a hypocrite. This is a lawmaker who could have voted
for the public option that he suggests has value, and could have voted
for much stronger overall health care reform bills in the past.
However, hypocrisy by a politician is hardly interesting in an
age when President Obama has broken so many explicit promises it's hard
to even count them anymore. What is far more notable is the substantive
argument Shadegg is voicing - it's both accurate and politically
telling.
Shadegg is absolutely correct that "America's private insurance
industry is the problem." He is also correct that this legislation is
exactly what that industry wants - not, as the Orwellian White House
spokesholes insist, some great victory over that industry. And Shadegg
is right that compelling people to buy an expensive (and faulty)
product from a private corporation without giving people at least the
choice of a public product is unprecedented and grotesque.
If the health care bill is not improved, this is exactly the
kind of argument the Republicans will make in the 2010 and 2012
election. And I say that not just because one lone GOP congressman is
making the argument, but because you are starting to hear a similar
case being made by top Republican Party officials.
Case in point is the interview I did last week on my AM760
radio show with Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dick Wadhams. You
can listen to it here - and specifically, listen to him rail on the insurance industry.
Again, it's obviously disingenuous coming from Republicans as
the GOP has been shilling for the insurance industry for years.
However, that doesn't mean it won't be powerful. It will be - and it
will be precisely because the Democrats - in weakening the health
legislation - have allowed Republicans to potentially outflank them (at
least image-wise) as the populist party of the little guy.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.