Can America Prevail on Afghanistan/Pakistan Front? No!
It's Obama's war now, and a Vietnam-like quagmire is dead ahead.
I had a flashback recently when I read a Washington Post news story
about how the U.S. commander in Afghanistan thinks he may need many
thousands more troops to win the war.
Shades of Vietnam. Do we ever learn?
It brought back memories of the late Gen. William C. Westmoreland,
the U.S. commander in Southeast Asia, who kept escalating the troop
numbers after the 1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam. His strategy produced
a debacle for us.
Fast forward to Afghanistan, 2009.
Now seven years into the war there, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the new
U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is in the middle of a 60-day assessment
of the war, due next month. But a Washington Post article says he has
been giving Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates weekly updates about the
need to bolster the size of the Afghan army and police force and the
likely deployment of thousands more U.S. trainers and advisers.
The present Pentagon plan calls for about 68,000 U.S. troops to be in Afghanistan by late this year.
Afghanistan, which once harbored Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaida training
camps, has been on Obama's agenda since his presidential campaign. Now
it's his war -- big time -- even as it takes on the appearance of
another quagmire for U.S. forces in their effort to quell the Taliban
and Al-Qaida fighters.
Gates is expected to go along with whatever McChrystal concludes is
necessary. So is Obama, a neophyte who has taken on the mission defined
by the Bush administration, apparently without hesitation.
Maybe the president should have asked the Russians on his recent
journey to Moscow how it was that a superpower like the Soviet Union
could have been forced to retreat from Afghanistan in the 1980s,
despite its modern military might.
Granted the United States was supporting the Afghans with arms and
training but the war proved to be too much for the Soviet forces.
The late Defense Secretary Robert McNamara in the Kennedy and
Johnson eras delivered public mea culpas in the aftermath of the
Vietnam War. I don't expect the same kind of acknowledgement from the
neoconservatives who got us into Iraq. That would be the day.
Nor will former President George W. Bush or Vice President Dick
Cheney or their hawkish team of architects show any remorse for their
terrible mistake in attacking Iraq.
The buck now stops with Obama, who is making a big deal about how he doesn't want to look back at past mistakes.
He could end up repeating those mistakes.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I had a flashback recently when I read a Washington Post news story
about how the U.S. commander in Afghanistan thinks he may need many
thousands more troops to win the war.
Shades of Vietnam. Do we ever learn?
It brought back memories of the late Gen. William C. Westmoreland,
the U.S. commander in Southeast Asia, who kept escalating the troop
numbers after the 1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam. His strategy produced
a debacle for us.
Fast forward to Afghanistan, 2009.
Now seven years into the war there, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the new
U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is in the middle of a 60-day assessment
of the war, due next month. But a Washington Post article says he has
been giving Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates weekly updates about the
need to bolster the size of the Afghan army and police force and the
likely deployment of thousands more U.S. trainers and advisers.
The present Pentagon plan calls for about 68,000 U.S. troops to be in Afghanistan by late this year.
Afghanistan, which once harbored Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaida training
camps, has been on Obama's agenda since his presidential campaign. Now
it's his war -- big time -- even as it takes on the appearance of
another quagmire for U.S. forces in their effort to quell the Taliban
and Al-Qaida fighters.
Gates is expected to go along with whatever McChrystal concludes is
necessary. So is Obama, a neophyte who has taken on the mission defined
by the Bush administration, apparently without hesitation.
Maybe the president should have asked the Russians on his recent
journey to Moscow how it was that a superpower like the Soviet Union
could have been forced to retreat from Afghanistan in the 1980s,
despite its modern military might.
Granted the United States was supporting the Afghans with arms and
training but the war proved to be too much for the Soviet forces.
The late Defense Secretary Robert McNamara in the Kennedy and
Johnson eras delivered public mea culpas in the aftermath of the
Vietnam War. I don't expect the same kind of acknowledgement from the
neoconservatives who got us into Iraq. That would be the day.
Nor will former President George W. Bush or Vice President Dick
Cheney or their hawkish team of architects show any remorse for their
terrible mistake in attacking Iraq.
The buck now stops with Obama, who is making a big deal about how he doesn't want to look back at past mistakes.
He could end up repeating those mistakes.
I had a flashback recently when I read a Washington Post news story
about how the U.S. commander in Afghanistan thinks he may need many
thousands more troops to win the war.
Shades of Vietnam. Do we ever learn?
It brought back memories of the late Gen. William C. Westmoreland,
the U.S. commander in Southeast Asia, who kept escalating the troop
numbers after the 1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam. His strategy produced
a debacle for us.
Fast forward to Afghanistan, 2009.
Now seven years into the war there, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the new
U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is in the middle of a 60-day assessment
of the war, due next month. But a Washington Post article says he has
been giving Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates weekly updates about the
need to bolster the size of the Afghan army and police force and the
likely deployment of thousands more U.S. trainers and advisers.
The present Pentagon plan calls for about 68,000 U.S. troops to be in Afghanistan by late this year.
Afghanistan, which once harbored Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaida training
camps, has been on Obama's agenda since his presidential campaign. Now
it's his war -- big time -- even as it takes on the appearance of
another quagmire for U.S. forces in their effort to quell the Taliban
and Al-Qaida fighters.
Gates is expected to go along with whatever McChrystal concludes is
necessary. So is Obama, a neophyte who has taken on the mission defined
by the Bush administration, apparently without hesitation.
Maybe the president should have asked the Russians on his recent
journey to Moscow how it was that a superpower like the Soviet Union
could have been forced to retreat from Afghanistan in the 1980s,
despite its modern military might.
Granted the United States was supporting the Afghans with arms and
training but the war proved to be too much for the Soviet forces.
The late Defense Secretary Robert McNamara in the Kennedy and
Johnson eras delivered public mea culpas in the aftermath of the
Vietnam War. I don't expect the same kind of acknowledgement from the
neoconservatives who got us into Iraq. That would be the day.
Nor will former President George W. Bush or Vice President Dick
Cheney or their hawkish team of architects show any remorse for their
terrible mistake in attacking Iraq.
The buck now stops with Obama, who is making a big deal about how he doesn't want to look back at past mistakes.
He could end up repeating those mistakes.