May 07, 2009
Sam Rayburn, a longtime speaker of the U.S. House, once said, "Every
now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it's
right."
Last week, 45 U.S. senators dodged an excellent chance to do just
what Mr. Sam advised. At issue was a straightforward, common-sense
amendment proposed by Dick Durbin, D-Ill. It would have allowed
bankruptcy judges to help hundreds of thousands of financially strapped
homeowners who now find themselves trapped by exploding, exorbitant
interest rates that bankers had attached to their loans.
Here was a conspicuous opportunity for even the most ethically blind
of our congress-critters to take a principled stand, for Durbin's bill
practically had a flashing red-and-yellow neon arrow attached to it,
declaring, "Vote Here for the People Against Greedy Bankers."
Actually, even GBs would've benefited, for the bankruptcy provision
would have allowed families to stay in their homes and keep making
monthly payments to banks (albeit in reduced amounts). Also, banks
could still make a profit (though not a killing), and there would be
far fewer vacant homes going on the market, thus giving a badly needed
break to America's depressed housing market.
What a sensible idea! So, naturally, the Senate stomped it to death.
The members were prodded to do so by Bank of America, Goldman Sachs,
JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and other upstanding members of the
hyper-aggressive GB lobby. These are, of course, the same banksters who
for years speculated rapaciously on people's homes, created a housing
bubble that has since burst and shattered our economy, reduced their
own financial fiefdoms to insolvency, then rushed to Washington to
unscrew the Capitol dome and help themselves to a taxpayer bailout that
is nearing $3 trillion.
Yet, the very idea of allowing bankrupt families to get a small
break in bankruptcy courts has caused Wall Street elites to squawk like
a banty rooster choking on a peach pit. They dispatched hundreds of
well-connected lobbyists to Congress, to the White House and to key
government agencies to nix Durbin's amendment (which, ironically,
would've been attached to a bill that awards even more billions of
taxpayer dollars to the banks).
Among the influence peddlers hired by bailout recipients were more
than 100 former lawmakers, top congressional staffers, White House
aides and agency officials.
Goldman Sachs alone has more than 30 ex-government officials in its
lobbying army, including former House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt and
the former top staffer to house banking chairman Barney Frank.
The first and chief target of this furious lobbying blitz was a guy
who had long backed the homeowners protection plan, promising again and
again last year that he would lead the fight to pass it: Barack Obama.
The banker lobbyists were aided in this effort to back off Obama by two
White House insiders who have shown themselves to be shameless Wall
Street softies - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and top economic
advisor Larry Summers. Timid Timothy reportedly argued that even a
small, tightly targeted bankruptcy provision for common folks would
create "uncertainty" for big investors in Wall Street banks.
Never mind that millions of homeowners are facing crushing
uncertainty over their mortgages, Obama and team promptly disappeared
from the legislative fight, abandoning Durbin.
This let Wall Street's hired guns go after pusillanimous,
bank-financed Democrats. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, for example, was a
swing vote, counted on by Durbin. But with no pressure from Obama, Bayh
was free to sidestep principle and vote his own political pocketbook.
Up for re-election next year, Bayh's top campaign donor is Goldman
Sachs.
Needing 60 votes for passage, Durbin got 45. In all, a dozen
Democrats gave Wall Street a big wet kiss by voting against Durbin's
amendment, which also was a vote against America's hard-pressed
homeowners - and against Mr. Sam's sage admonition.
"The banks are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill,"
sighed Sen. Durbin afterward. He added this sobering note: "They
frankly own the place."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the books "Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow" (2008) and "There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road But Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos: A Work of Political Subversion" (1998). Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.
Sam Rayburn, a longtime speaker of the U.S. House, once said, "Every
now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it's
right."
Last week, 45 U.S. senators dodged an excellent chance to do just
what Mr. Sam advised. At issue was a straightforward, common-sense
amendment proposed by Dick Durbin, D-Ill. It would have allowed
bankruptcy judges to help hundreds of thousands of financially strapped
homeowners who now find themselves trapped by exploding, exorbitant
interest rates that bankers had attached to their loans.
Here was a conspicuous opportunity for even the most ethically blind
of our congress-critters to take a principled stand, for Durbin's bill
practically had a flashing red-and-yellow neon arrow attached to it,
declaring, "Vote Here for the People Against Greedy Bankers."
Actually, even GBs would've benefited, for the bankruptcy provision
would have allowed families to stay in their homes and keep making
monthly payments to banks (albeit in reduced amounts). Also, banks
could still make a profit (though not a killing), and there would be
far fewer vacant homes going on the market, thus giving a badly needed
break to America's depressed housing market.
What a sensible idea! So, naturally, the Senate stomped it to death.
The members were prodded to do so by Bank of America, Goldman Sachs,
JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and other upstanding members of the
hyper-aggressive GB lobby. These are, of course, the same banksters who
for years speculated rapaciously on people's homes, created a housing
bubble that has since burst and shattered our economy, reduced their
own financial fiefdoms to insolvency, then rushed to Washington to
unscrew the Capitol dome and help themselves to a taxpayer bailout that
is nearing $3 trillion.
Yet, the very idea of allowing bankrupt families to get a small
break in bankruptcy courts has caused Wall Street elites to squawk like
a banty rooster choking on a peach pit. They dispatched hundreds of
well-connected lobbyists to Congress, to the White House and to key
government agencies to nix Durbin's amendment (which, ironically,
would've been attached to a bill that awards even more billions of
taxpayer dollars to the banks).
Among the influence peddlers hired by bailout recipients were more
than 100 former lawmakers, top congressional staffers, White House
aides and agency officials.
Goldman Sachs alone has more than 30 ex-government officials in its
lobbying army, including former House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt and
the former top staffer to house banking chairman Barney Frank.
The first and chief target of this furious lobbying blitz was a guy
who had long backed the homeowners protection plan, promising again and
again last year that he would lead the fight to pass it: Barack Obama.
The banker lobbyists were aided in this effort to back off Obama by two
White House insiders who have shown themselves to be shameless Wall
Street softies - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and top economic
advisor Larry Summers. Timid Timothy reportedly argued that even a
small, tightly targeted bankruptcy provision for common folks would
create "uncertainty" for big investors in Wall Street banks.
Never mind that millions of homeowners are facing crushing
uncertainty over their mortgages, Obama and team promptly disappeared
from the legislative fight, abandoning Durbin.
This let Wall Street's hired guns go after pusillanimous,
bank-financed Democrats. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, for example, was a
swing vote, counted on by Durbin. But with no pressure from Obama, Bayh
was free to sidestep principle and vote his own political pocketbook.
Up for re-election next year, Bayh's top campaign donor is Goldman
Sachs.
Needing 60 votes for passage, Durbin got 45. In all, a dozen
Democrats gave Wall Street a big wet kiss by voting against Durbin's
amendment, which also was a vote against America's hard-pressed
homeowners - and against Mr. Sam's sage admonition.
"The banks are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill,"
sighed Sen. Durbin afterward. He added this sobering note: "They
frankly own the place."
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the books "Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow" (2008) and "There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road But Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos: A Work of Political Subversion" (1998). Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.
Sam Rayburn, a longtime speaker of the U.S. House, once said, "Every
now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it's
right."
Last week, 45 U.S. senators dodged an excellent chance to do just
what Mr. Sam advised. At issue was a straightforward, common-sense
amendment proposed by Dick Durbin, D-Ill. It would have allowed
bankruptcy judges to help hundreds of thousands of financially strapped
homeowners who now find themselves trapped by exploding, exorbitant
interest rates that bankers had attached to their loans.
Here was a conspicuous opportunity for even the most ethically blind
of our congress-critters to take a principled stand, for Durbin's bill
practically had a flashing red-and-yellow neon arrow attached to it,
declaring, "Vote Here for the People Against Greedy Bankers."
Actually, even GBs would've benefited, for the bankruptcy provision
would have allowed families to stay in their homes and keep making
monthly payments to banks (albeit in reduced amounts). Also, banks
could still make a profit (though not a killing), and there would be
far fewer vacant homes going on the market, thus giving a badly needed
break to America's depressed housing market.
What a sensible idea! So, naturally, the Senate stomped it to death.
The members were prodded to do so by Bank of America, Goldman Sachs,
JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and other upstanding members of the
hyper-aggressive GB lobby. These are, of course, the same banksters who
for years speculated rapaciously on people's homes, created a housing
bubble that has since burst and shattered our economy, reduced their
own financial fiefdoms to insolvency, then rushed to Washington to
unscrew the Capitol dome and help themselves to a taxpayer bailout that
is nearing $3 trillion.
Yet, the very idea of allowing bankrupt families to get a small
break in bankruptcy courts has caused Wall Street elites to squawk like
a banty rooster choking on a peach pit. They dispatched hundreds of
well-connected lobbyists to Congress, to the White House and to key
government agencies to nix Durbin's amendment (which, ironically,
would've been attached to a bill that awards even more billions of
taxpayer dollars to the banks).
Among the influence peddlers hired by bailout recipients were more
than 100 former lawmakers, top congressional staffers, White House
aides and agency officials.
Goldman Sachs alone has more than 30 ex-government officials in its
lobbying army, including former House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt and
the former top staffer to house banking chairman Barney Frank.
The first and chief target of this furious lobbying blitz was a guy
who had long backed the homeowners protection plan, promising again and
again last year that he would lead the fight to pass it: Barack Obama.
The banker lobbyists were aided in this effort to back off Obama by two
White House insiders who have shown themselves to be shameless Wall
Street softies - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and top economic
advisor Larry Summers. Timid Timothy reportedly argued that even a
small, tightly targeted bankruptcy provision for common folks would
create "uncertainty" for big investors in Wall Street banks.
Never mind that millions of homeowners are facing crushing
uncertainty over their mortgages, Obama and team promptly disappeared
from the legislative fight, abandoning Durbin.
This let Wall Street's hired guns go after pusillanimous,
bank-financed Democrats. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, for example, was a
swing vote, counted on by Durbin. But with no pressure from Obama, Bayh
was free to sidestep principle and vote his own political pocketbook.
Up for re-election next year, Bayh's top campaign donor is Goldman
Sachs.
Needing 60 votes for passage, Durbin got 45. In all, a dozen
Democrats gave Wall Street a big wet kiss by voting against Durbin's
amendment, which also was a vote against America's hard-pressed
homeowners - and against Mr. Sam's sage admonition.
"The banks are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill,"
sighed Sen. Durbin afterward. He added this sobering note: "They
frankly own the place."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.